Fandom vs Telepedia

FFandom9.3Visit Telepedia8.5Visit

Higher score F Fandom #2 in Game Wiki Software 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Fandom

vs

Telepedia #6 in Game Wiki Software 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Telepedia

• Fandom fits best

  Large, established collaborative game communities

• Telepedia fits best

  Free MediaWiki-style game wiki hosting

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	FFandom 9.3/10 Visit ↗	Telepedia 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.3	8.5
Ranking	#2 in Game Wiki Software	#6 in Game Wiki Software
Best for	Large, established collaborative game communities	Free MediaWiki-style game wiki hosting
Pricing model	Free	Free
Starting price	Free plan	Free plan
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud, Mobile	Cloud
Platforms	Web, macOS, iOS, Android	Web
Support	Docs	Tickets, Community, Docs
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business
Features Fandom 4/5 · Telepedia 4/5
Custom domain	—	Not checked yet
Role permissions	✓	✓
Revision history	✓	✓
Media uploads	✓	✓
API access	✓	✓
Specs
Storage limit	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Free public wikis with collaborative editing and revision history Strong customization with templates, infoboxes, CSS, and JavaScript API access, exports, uploads, permissions, and mobile apps	Free wiki creation through a self-service wizard MediaWiki editing with VisualEditor and portable infoboxes Permissions, uploads, revision history, and API access
Cons	Wikis are hosted on fandom.com subdomains Custom domains are not supported Public wikis may not suit private documentation needs	Web-only platform Built for public community wikis rather than private workspaces Custom-domain support and storage quotas are not part of the published details
Our verdict	Fandom is a hosted wiki platform for fan communities, game developers, publishers, studios, and production companies. It supports public game wikis with collaborative article editing, revision histories, media and file uploads, categories,… Read the review →	Telepedia is a hosted wiki platform for communities creating public knowledge bases about games and other fan subjects. Its MediaWiki foundation supports familiar wiki editing and administration, while a self-service creation wizard helps… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Fandom — where it wins

  • Free public wikis with collaborative editing and revision history
  • Strong customization with templates, infoboxes, CSS, and JavaScript
  • API access, exports, uploads, permissions, and mobile apps

  Where it doesn't

  • Wikis are hosted on fandom.com subdomains
  • Custom domains are not supported
  • Public wikis may not suit private documentation needs

• Telepedia — where it wins

  • Free wiki creation through a self-service wizard
  • MediaWiki editing with VisualEditor and portable infoboxes
  • Permissions, uploads, revision history, and API access

  Where it doesn't

  • Web-only platform
  • Built for public community wikis rather than private workspaces
  • Custom-domain support and storage quotas are not part of the published details

• FFandom9.3/10 · Free plan

  A free, feature-rich home for public game communities that do not need custom domains.

  Visit FandomFull verdict →
• Telepedia8.5/10 · Free plan

  A free, MediaWiki-based home for public game knowledge bases.

  Visit TelepediaFull verdict →