Head-to-head · AI Photo Culling Software
Facet vs Optyx
Facet leads on 0 checks, Optyx on 0, and 8 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 8 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreFacet · 8.2/10
- Free planboth
Facet scores higher on our rubric for ai photo culling software: 8.2 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.
Facet is the better fit for users wanting free, broad, self-hosted culling. Optyx is the better fit for budget-conscious Lightroom users.
- Facet fits best
Users wanting free, broad, self-hosted culling
- Optyx fits best
Budget-conscious Lightroom users
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Facet 8.2/10 Visit ↗ | Optyx 7.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Ranking | #2 in AI Photo Culling Software | #3 in AI Photo Culling Software |
| Best for | Users wanting free, broad, self-hosted culling | Budget-conscious Lightroom users |
| Pricing model | Free | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | $6.99/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS |
| Support | Community, Docs | Email, Docs |
| Integrations | 6 integrations | 1 integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market | Solo, Small business, Mid-market |
| Features Facet 7/7 · Optyx 7/7 | ||
| AI quality scoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Subject detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Duplicate detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| RAW photo support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Blur detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Closed-eye detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lightroom export | ✓ | ✓ |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Facet is a free, open-source photo-analysis and culling engine for photographers who want processing on their own hardware. It runs across web, Windows, macOS, Linux, and self-hosted deployments, and supports RAW, JPEG, and HEIF/HEIC… Read the review → |
Optyx is desktop photo-culling software for photographers who need to narrow large shoots into stronger selections. It is aimed especially at portrait, wedding, and event professionals, with tools for grouping similar photographs,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Facet — where it wins
- Scores quality across sharpness, faces, exposure, color, and composition
- Detects bursts, duplicates, similar images, closed eyes, and expressions
- Supports RAW, Lightroom export, galleries, search, and self-hosting
Where it doesn't
- Local deployment puts hardware and maintenance responsibility on the user
- Its broad gallery and organization features may exceed simple culling needs
- Workflow setup varies across Docker, native, desktop, and web deployments
Optyx — where it wins
- AI grouping, culling, face, focus, blink, and expression analysis
- RAW import, previews, ratings, color labels, and XMP transfer
- Free plan plus Pro from $6.99/month billed annually
Where it doesn't
- Adobe Lightroom is the listed integration
- AI culling features are available on Pro plans
- Runs on Windows and macOS desktop systems
- Facet8.2/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source culling engine with broad AI analysis and local deployment.
Visit FacetFull verdict → - Optyx7.9/10 · Free plan · paid from $6.99/mo (annual)
A budget-friendly Lightroom companion for AI-assisted photo selection.
Visit OptyxFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Aftershoot vs Facet
- Aftershoot vs Optyx
- Facet vs FilterPixel
- Facet vs AccioPix Photo Culling
- Facet vs Narrative Select
- Facet vs Futura Photo
- Facet vs imagic
- Optyx vs FilterPixel
All AI photo culling software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





