Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Content Management Systems

Drupal vs Sulu

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score Drupal #1 in Content Management Systems 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 6 of 6 features Visit Drupal
Sulu #22 in Content Management Systems 6.7/10 Open source ✓ 6 of 6 features Visit Sulu

Drupal leads on 0 checks, Sulu on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreDrupal · 9.4/10
  • Free planonly Drupal

Drupal scores higher on our rubric for content management systems: 9.4 against 6.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #22.

On platform type, Drupal gives you Hybrid where Sulu offers Self_hosted.

Drupal is the better fit for complex structured and editorial content. Sulu is the better fit for multisite and multilingual organizations.

  • Drupal fits best

    Complex structured and editorial content

  • Sulu fits best

    Multisite and multilingual organizations

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Drupal 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Sulu 6.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 6.7
Ranking #1 in Content Management Systems #22 in Content Management Systems
Best for Complex structured and editorial content Multisite and multilingual organizations
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Community, Docs Email, Community, Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Drupal 6/6 · Sulu 6/6
Editorial workflows ✓ ✓
Custom user roles ✓ ✓
Multilingual content ✓ ✓
SEO tools ✓ ✓
Media library ✓ ✓
Custom content types ✓ ✓
Specs
Platform type Hybrid Self_hosted
Our review
Pros
  • Configurable content types and fields support deep structured content.
  • Editorial workflows, custom permissions, and multilingual support are built in.
  • API-first options, visual building, media, SEO, and enterprise integrations.️
  • Multisite and multilingual content management with localization controls
  • Editorial workflows cover revision, approval, publishing, and archiving
  • Fine-grained permissions, reusable blocks, SEO, media, and headless delivery
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployments add hosting and maintenance responsibilities.
  • Advanced implementations can require developer or agency involvement.
  • Its broad feature set may exceed the needs of simpler websites.
  • Self-hosted operation requires deployment and infrastructure ownership
  • Its feature depth may exceed the needs of a simple single-site CMS
  • PHP and Symfony expertise is relevant for implementation and customization
Our verdict

Drupal is a free, open-source content management platform for websites and digital experiences. It is designed for developers, agencies, and organizations that need configurable content models, custom architecture, integrations, and…

Read the review →

Sulu is an open-source content management system for PHP and Symfony developers building complex websites, web applications, and content-driven platforms. It supports multisite webspace management, multilingual content, structured page…

Read the review →
  1. DrupalContent Management Systems 9.4Free plan
  2. SuluContent Management Systems 6.7Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Drupal — where it wins

    • Configurable content types and fields support deep structured content.
    • Editorial workflows, custom permissions, and multilingual support are built in.
    • API-first options, visual building, media, SEO, and enterprise integrations.️

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployments add hosting and maintenance responsibilities.
    • Advanced implementations can require developer or agency involvement.
    • Its broad feature set may exceed the needs of simpler websites.

  • Sulu — where it wins

    • Multisite and multilingual content management with localization controls
    • Editorial workflows cover revision, approval, publishing, and archiving
    • Fine-grained permissions, reusable blocks, SEO, media, and headless delivery

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted operation requires deployment and infrastructure ownership
    • Its feature depth may exceed the needs of a simple single-site CMS
    • PHP and Symfony expertise is relevant for implementation and customization
  • Drupal9.4/10 · Free plan

    A mature CMS for complex content, editorial control, and custom digital architectures.

    Visit DrupalFull verdict →
  • Sulu6.7/10 · Open source

    A flexible open-source CMS for organizations managing multilingual, multisite content.

    Visit SuluFull verdict →

More comparisons

All content management systems comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update