Head-to-head · Wi-Fi Security Scanner Apps
Domotz vs Airward
Domotz leads on 0 checks, Airward on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreDomotz · 8.4/10
- Free planboth
- Free trialonly Domotz
- Most featuresAirward · 3 of 3
Domotz scores higher on our rubric for wi-fi security scanner apps: 8.4 against 7.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.
Domotz is the better fit for teams monitoring broader network infrastructure. Airward is the better fit for mac users seeking Wi-Fi security change alerts.
- Domotz fits best
Teams monitoring broader network infrastructure
- Airward fits best
Mac users seeking Wi-Fi security change alerts
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Domotz 8.4/10 Visit ↗ | Airward 7.7/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.4 | 7.7 |
| Ranking | #3 in Wi-Fi Security Scanner Apps | #8 in Wi-Fi Security Scanner Apps |
| Best for | Teams monitoring broader network infrastructure | Mac users seeking Wi-Fi security change alerts |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | $15/device/mo | €39.99 one-time |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | 14 days | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop, Mobile | Desktop |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | macOS |
| Support | Email, Docs | |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business |
| Features Domotz 0/3 · Airward 3/3 | ||
| Device discovery | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Security checks | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Monitoring alerts | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Specs | ||
| Supported platforms | Not checked yet | macos |
| Scan method | Not checked yet | Both |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Domotz is a network monitoring and management platform for managed service providers, internal IT teams, and integrators. It discovers connected devices, shows their status, and maps network topology, making it a fit for teams responsible… Read the review → |
Airward is a macOS app for people who want to inventory devices on a local network and watch for suspicious Wi-Fi changes. It identifies devices by vendor, IP address, type and open ports, and lets users name, label and mark devices as… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Domotz — where it wins
- Discovers and classifies devices, then maps network topology
- Monitors device status, SNMP sensors, TCP services, and traffic
- Offers email, webhook, integration, and mobile push alerts
Where it doesn't
- Covers broader network management, not just Wi-Fi security scanning
- Managed-device monitoring starts at $15 monthly for a 10-device bundle
- Monitored sites require locally deployed collectors
Airward — where it wins
- Free plan includes live device inventory and on-demand rescans
- Pro detects rogue access points and encryption downgrades
- Local analysis keeps inventory and event history on the Mac
Where it doesn't
- Available only for macOS 14 or later
- Change alerts and full event history require Pro
- Focused on local Wi-Fi monitoring rather than broader security
- Domotz8.4/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial
Broad network monitoring with a free discovery tier and paid per-collector or per-device plans.
Visit DomotzFull verdict → - Airward7.7/10 · Free plan
A macOS Wi-Fi scanner with free inventory and paid change alerts.
Visit AirwardFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Fing Security vs Domotz
- Fing Security vs Airward
- SoftPerfect WiFi Guard vs Domotz
- SoftPerfect WiFi Guard vs Airward
- Domotz vs Angry IP Scanner
- Domotz vs WiFiman
- Domotz vs SoftPerfect Network Scanner
- Domotz vs Trend Micro Maximum Security
All Wi-Fi security scanner apps comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





