Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Web Frameworks

Django vs Buffalo

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Django #2 in Web Frameworks 9.1/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Django
Buffalo #13 in Web Frameworks 7.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Buffalo

Django leads on 0 checks, Buffalo on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreDjango · 9.1/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresDjango · 2 of 2

Django scores higher on our rubric for web frameworks: 9.1 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #13.

On framework type, Buffalo gives you Full-stack where Django offers Backend.

Django is the better fit for python teams needing a full-featured backend. Buffalo is the better fit for go teams wanting an integrated full-stack toolkit.

  • Django fits best

    Python teams needing a full-featured backend

  • Buffalo fits best

    Go teams wanting an integrated full-stack toolkit

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Django 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Buffalo 7.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 7.6
Ranking #2 in Web Frameworks #13 in Web Frameworks
Best for Python teams needing a full-featured backend Go teams wanting an integrated full-stack toolkit
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted, Cloud
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Django 2/2 · Buffalo 1/2
Included ORM ✓ ✓
Built-in authentication ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Framework type Backend Full-stack
Primary languages Python Go
Rendering modes Hybrid Hybrid
Deployment targets Self-hosted Self-hosted
License model Open-source Open-source
Our review
Pros
  • Built-in ORM, authentication, authorization, and content administration
  • Security protections address common web vulnerabilities
  • Supports both WSGI and ASGI deployment targets
  • Combines routing, middleware, sessions, cookies, and error handling
  • Includes Plush templates, Webpack asset handling, and hot code reloading
  • Provides Pop database tooling, background workers, and application generators
Cons
  • Deployment is self-hosted rather than managed
  • Python-focused backend scope may not suit other language teams
  • Support channels center on documentation and community
  • Focused on building applications in Go
  • Uses a Webpack-based frontend asset pipeline
  • Not a hosted SaaS product for teams seeking managed application hosting
Our verdict

Django is a free, open-source web framework for building Python web applications. It suits solo developers and teams across small, mid-market, and enterprise organizations that want a backend framework with common application components…

Read the review →

Buffalo is an open-source web development ecosystem for building web applications in Go. Its CLI helps create, build, run, and test applications, while the framework supports both server-rendered projects and API-only services. It is aimed…

Read the review →
  1. DjangoWeb Frameworks 9.1Free plan
  2. BuffaloWeb Frameworks 7.6Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Django — where it wins

    • Built-in ORM, authentication, authorization, and content administration
    • Security protections address common web vulnerabilities
    • Supports both WSGI and ASGI deployment targets

    Where it doesn't

    • Deployment is self-hosted rather than managed
    • Python-focused backend scope may not suit other language teams
    • Support channels center on documentation and community

  • Buffalo — where it wins

    • Combines routing, middleware, sessions, cookies, and error handling
    • Includes Plush templates, Webpack asset handling, and hot code reloading
    • Provides Pop database tooling, background workers, and application generators

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on building applications in Go
    • Uses a Webpack-based frontend asset pipeline
    • Not a hosted SaaS product for teams seeking managed application hosting
  • Django9.1/10 · Free plan

    A free Python backend framework combining ORM, authentication, administration, and deployment flexibility.

    Visit DjangoFull verdict →
  • Buffalo7.6/10 · Free plan

    An open-source Go framework that brings application tooling and web features together.

    Visit BuffaloFull verdict →

More comparisons

All web frameworks comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update