Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Urban Planning and Design Software

CUBE vs PTV Vissim

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score CUBE #2 in Urban Planning and Design Software 8.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 5 features Visit CUBE
PTV Vissim #6 in Urban Planning and Design Software 6.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 5 features Visit PTV Vissim

CUBE leads on 0 checks, PTV Vissim on 2, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCUBE · 8.2/10
  • Most featuresPTV Vissim · 3 of 5

CUBE scores higher on our rubric for urban planning and design software: 8.2 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

PTV Vissim offers spatial analysis; CUBE doesn't publish it. PTV Vissim offers 3d visualization; CUBE doesn't publish it.

CUBE is the better fit for teams focused on travel-demand and transport planning. PTV Vissim is the better fit for teams simulating multimodal traffic operations.

  • CUBE fits best

    Teams focused on travel-demand and transport planning

  • PTV Vissim fits best

    Teams simulating multimodal traffic operations

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature CUBE 8.2/10 Visit ↗ PTV Vissim 6.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.2 6.9
Ranking #2 in Urban Planning and Design Software #6 in Urban Planning and Design Software
Best for Teams focused on travel-demand and transport planning Teams simulating multimodal traffic operations
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan Not published Not published
Free trial — —
Features CUBE 1/5 · PTV Vissim 3/5
Scenario planning ✓ ✓
Zoning and land use Not published Not published
Spatial analysis Not published ✓ (best)
3D visualization Not published ✓ (best)
Public engagement tools Not published Not published
Specs
Deployment Not published Desktop
Our review
Pros
  • Dedicated travel-demand modeling for transportation analysis
  • Supports transportation planning and network planning workflows
  • Scenario planning capability for comparing transport options
  • Microscopic modeling covers vehicles, transit, bicycles and pedestrians
  • Tests signal control, traffic operations and alternative scenarios
  • 3D views pair with network performance analysis and reporting
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting Bentley Systems sales
  • Focused on transportation analysis rather than general urban design
  • Public deployment and integration details are limited
  • Windows desktop deployment limits platform flexibility
  • Contact-sales pricing requires a quote before budgeting
  • Focused on traffic simulation rather than broad urban planning
Our verdict

CUBE is Bentley Systems software for transportation planning and travel demand modeling. It is aimed at planners and transportation professionals who need to forecast travel, analyze networks, and compare transportation scenarios. The…

Read the review →

PTV Vissim is microscopic, multimodal traffic simulation software for transportation planners, traffic engineers, consultants and public agencies. It models vehicle, transit, bicycle and pedestrian movement on detailed road networks,…

Read the review →
  1. CUBEUrban Planning and Design Software 8.2Pricing on request
  2. PTV VissimUrban Planning and Design Software 6.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • CUBE — where it wins

    • Dedicated travel-demand modeling for transportation analysis
    • Supports transportation planning and network planning workflows
    • Scenario planning capability for comparing transport options

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting Bentley Systems sales
    • Focused on transportation analysis rather than general urban design
    • Public deployment and integration details are limited
  • PTV Vissim — where it wins

    • Microscopic modeling covers vehicles, transit, bicycles and pedestrians
    • Tests signal control, traffic operations and alternative scenarios
    • 3D views pair with network performance analysis and reporting

    Where it doesn't

    • Windows desktop deployment limits platform flexibility
    • Contact-sales pricing requires a quote before budgeting
    • Focused on traffic simulation rather than broad urban planning
  • CUBE8.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused choice for teams modeling travel demand and transportation networks.

    Visit CUBEFull verdict →
  • PTV Vissim6.9/10 · Pricing on request

    Detailed multimodal traffic simulation with scenario testing, 3D views and performance reporting.

    Visit PTV VissimFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update