Head-to-head · Convenience Store Software
CStoreiQ vs FTx POS
CStoreiQ leads on 0 checks, FTx POS on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreCStoreiQ · 9.2/10
CStoreiQ scores higher on our rubric for convenience store software: 9.2 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #5.
CStoreiQ is the better fit for multi-store operators needing deep controls. FTx POS is the better fit for chains wanting straightforward core POS.
- CStoreiQ fits best
Multi-store operators needing deep controls
- FTx POS fits best
Chains wanting straightforward core POS
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | CStoreiQ 9.2/10 Visit ↗ | FTx POS 8.5/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Ranking | #2 in Convenience Store Software | #5 in Convenience Store Software |
| Best for | Multi-store operators needing deep controls | Chains wanting straightforward core POS |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $999/site/yr | Pricing on request |
| Free plan | — | Not checked yet |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features CStoreiQ 6/6 · FTx POS 6/6 | ||
| Fuel management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Age-restricted sales | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lottery management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Loyalty program | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-store support | ✓ | ✓ |
| POS hardware support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | CStoreiQ combines back-office operations and point-of-sale tools for convenience stores and gas stations. It is aimed at operators who need to coordinate price books, inventory, fuel, lottery, scan data and reporting, including across… Read the review → |
FTx POS is a point-of-sale system for convenience retailers handling store merchandise, fuel forecourts and related sales. Its core scope combines checkout with fuel-pump transactions, age-restricted item controls, lottery handling,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
CStoreiQ — where it wins
- Unifies fuel, lottery, inventory, loyalty and price-book workflows.
- Loss-prevention tools link transactions with video and flag voids.
- Supports offline transactions, age-check prompts and several POS systems.
Where it doesn't
- The listed Full Access price is $999 per store per year, billed annually.
- Its extensive feature set may exceed the needs of single-store operators.
- POS compatibility is specified for Verifone, Gilbarco and TravStar.
FTx POS — where it wins
- Supports checkout for convenience-store merchandise and forecourt transactions
- Includes age-restricted sales controls and lottery workflows
- Combines loyalty, promotions and multi-location management
Where it doesn't
- Plan prices are available only by contacting FTx
- Requires compatible POS checkout hardware
- Focuses on convenience retail operations rather than a broad software suite
- CStoreiQ9.2/10 · Paid
A broad back-office and POS platform for stores managing fuel, lottery, loyalty and inventory.
Visit CStoreiQFull verdict → - FTx POS8.5/10 · Pricing on request
Core convenience-store POS covering forecourt sales, restricted items, lottery and loyalty.
Visit FTxFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Gilbarco Passport vs CStoreiQ
- Gilbarco Passport vs FTx POS
- CStoreiQ vs CStoreSync
- CStoreiQ vs FuelDesk Pro
- CStoreiQ vs SSCS
- CStoreiQ vs C-Store POS
- CStoreiQ vs KORONA POS
- CStoreSync vs FTx POS
All convenience store software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update



