Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · AI SOC Agents

CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR vs Exabeam Nova

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR #1 in AI SOC Agents 9.3/10 Pricing on request · 15-day trial Free trial✓ 1 of 4 features Contact CrowdStrike
Exabeam Nova #3 in AI SOC Agents 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Exabeam Nova

CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR leads on 0 checks, Exabeam Nova on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR · 9.3/10
  • Free trialonly CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR
  • Most featuresExabeam Nova · 4 of 4

CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR scores higher on our rubric for ai soc agents: 9.3 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR is the better fit for enterprise security teams orchestrating SOAR workflows. Exabeam Nova is the better fit for mid-market and enterprise Exabeam users.

  • CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR fits best

    Enterprise security teams orchestrating SOAR workflows

  • Exabeam Nova fits best

    Mid-market and enterprise Exabeam users

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR 9.3/10 Visit ↗ Exabeam Nova 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.9
Ranking #1 in AI SOC Agents #3 in AI SOC Agents
Best for Enterprise security teams orchestrating SOAR workflows Mid-market and enterprise Exabeam users
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial 15 days —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Integrations 6 integrations 650+ integrations
Built for Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR 1/4 · Exabeam Nova 4/4
Alert triage Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Response actions Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Human approval controls Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Incident case management ✓ ✓
Specs
Investigation autonomy Not checked yet Automated
Deployment Not checked yet Cloud
Our review
Pros
  • Combines no-code agents, deterministic workflows and multi-agent orchestration
  • Supports human approval or autonomous execution with audit logging
  • Connects bidirectionally through MCP and integrates across security and IT tools
  • Specialized agents cover scoring, investigation, search, visualization and rule creation
  • Automated evidence collection, attack timelines and response playbooks
  • 650 integrations plus SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA and PCI DSS coverage
Cons
  • Pricing is credit-based and requires contacting CrowdStrike
  • Essentials has limited workflow and case-management capabilities
  • Full SOAR workflow engine and detection triage agent require the main plan
  • Contact-sales pricing limits upfront budget comparison
  • Cloud-only deployment excludes teams requiring on-premises options
  • Embedded New-Scale positioning may not suit standalone-agent buyers
Our verdict

CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR coordinates AI agents, deterministic workflows and custom applications across security and IT operations. It is aimed at enterprise security teams, particularly those working with the CrowdStrike Falcon…

Read the review →

Exabeam Nova is a coordinated set of AI agents embedded in Exabeam’s New-Scale Security Operations Platform. It is designed for mid-market and enterprise security operations teams, particularly organizations already working with Exabeam.…

Read the review →
  1. CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOARAI SOC Agents 9.3Pricing on request · 15-day trial
  2. Exabeam NovaAI SOC Agents 8.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR — where it wins

    • Combines no-code agents, deterministic workflows and multi-agent orchestration
    • Supports human approval or autonomous execution with audit logging
    • Connects bidirectionally through MCP and integrates across security and IT tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is credit-based and requires contacting CrowdStrike
    • Essentials has limited workflow and case-management capabilities
    • Full SOAR workflow engine and detection triage agent require the main plan
  • Exabeam Nova — where it wins

    • Specialized agents cover scoring, investigation, search, visualization and rule creation
    • Automated evidence collection, attack timelines and response playbooks
    • 650 integrations plus SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA and PCI DSS coverage

    Where it doesn't

    • Contact-sales pricing limits upfront budget comparison
    • Cloud-only deployment excludes teams requiring on-premises options
    • Embedded New-Scale positioning may not suit standalone-agent buyers
  • CrowdStrike Charlotte Agentic SOAR9.3/10 · Pricing on request · 15-day trial

    An enterprise SOAR platform for coordinating AI agents, workflows and security cases.

    Contact CrowdStrikeFull verdict →
  • Exabeam Nova8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    A coordinated AI-agent layer for Exabeam teams handling detection through response.

    Visit Exabeam NovaFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update