Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · AI Agent Memory Tools

Cognee vs Engrama

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Cognee #5 in AI Agent Memory Tools 7.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Cognee
Engrama #7 in AI Agent Memory Tools 7.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Engrama

Cognee leads on 0 checks, Engrama on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCognee · 7.7/10
  • Free planboth

Cognee scores higher on our rubric for ai agent memory tools: 7.7 against 7.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

Cognee is the better fit for teams building knowledge-graph agent memory. Engrama is the better fit for developers wanting graph memory with profiles.

  • Cognee fits best

    Teams building knowledge-graph agent memory

  • Engrama fits best

    Developers wanting graph memory with profiles

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Cognee 7.7/10 Visit ↗ Engrama 7.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.7 7.5
Ranking #5 in AI Agent Memory Tools #7 in AI Agent Memory Tools
Best for Teams building knowledge-graph agent memory Developers wanting graph memory with profiles
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $1/unit usage-based $19/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Community, Docs Community
Integrations 7 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Cognee 3/4 · Engrama 3/4
Semantic memory ✓ ✓
Episodic memory Not checked yet Not checked yet
User/profile memory ✓ ✓
Graph-based memory ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment options Both Both
SDK languages Not checked yet 2
Retention policy Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Transforms varied data into searchable entities-and-relationships graphs
  • Supports natural-language, temporal, completion, and chunk searches
  • Offers open-source self-hosting plus managed Cognee Cloud
  • Automatic fact and intent extraction from conversations
  • Typed, versioned graphs with hybrid graph and vector retrieval
  • Hosted or self-hosted deployment with TypeScript and Python SDKs
Cons
  • Usage-based billing can make monthly costs harder to forecast
  • BYOC and dedicated support are available only on Enterprise
  • Graph-centered workflows may exceed the needs of simple memory stores
  • Analytics and webhooks are available only on paid tiers
  • SSO/SAML and uptime SLAs start with the Scale plan
  • Unlimited tokens and search are reserved for Enterprise
Our verdict

Cognee is an open-source memory engine and knowledge-graph platform for developers building AI agents and other AI applications. It ingests text, documents, and structured data, then processes them into graphs with entities, relationships,…

Read the review →

Engrama provides long-term memory infrastructure for AI agents, copilots, chatbots and personal assistants. It extracts facts and intents from conversations and connected data, links them in typed, versioned graphs, and returns ranked…

Read the review →
  1. CogneeAI Agent Memory Tools 7.7Free plan
  2. EngramaAI Agent Memory Tools 7.5Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Cognee — where it wins

    • Transforms varied data into searchable entities-and-relationships graphs
    • Supports natural-language, temporal, completion, and chunk searches
    • Offers open-source self-hosting plus managed Cognee Cloud

    Where it doesn't

    • Usage-based billing can make monthly costs harder to forecast
    • BYOC and dedicated support are available only on Enterprise
    • Graph-centered workflows may exceed the needs of simple memory stores
  • Engrama — where it wins

    • Automatic fact and intent extraction from conversations
    • Typed, versioned graphs with hybrid graph and vector retrieval
    • Hosted or self-hosted deployment with TypeScript and Python SDKs

    Where it doesn't

    • Analytics and webhooks are available only on paid tiers
    • SSO/SAML and uptime SLAs start with the Scale plan
    • Unlimited tokens and search are reserved for Enterprise

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update