Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Vendor Management

Certa Third-Party Risk Management vs GEP SMART Supplier Management

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Certa Third-Party Risk Management #5 in Vendor Management 8.5/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Certa
GEP SMART Supplier Management #7 in Vendor Management 8.3/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 5 features Visit GEP

Certa Third-Party Risk Management leads on 0 checks, GEP SMART Supplier Management on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCerta Third-Party Risk Management · 8.5/10
  • Most featuresGEP SMART Supplier Management · 1 of 5

Certa Third-Party Risk Management scores higher on our rubric for vendor management: 8.5 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

Certa Third-Party Risk Management is the better fit for enterprises wanting configurable risk workflows. GEP SMART Supplier Management is the better fit for enterprise supplier master-data programs.

  • Certa Third-Party Risk Management fits best

    Enterprises wanting configurable risk workflows

  • GEP SMART Supplier Management fits best

    Enterprise supplier master-data programs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Certa Third-Party Risk Management 8.5/10 Visit ↗ GEP SMART Supplier Management 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 8.3
Ranking #5 in Vendor Management #7 in Vendor Management
Best for Enterprises wanting configurable risk workflows Enterprise supplier master-data programs
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Tickets Email
Integrations 130+ integrations 1 integrations
Built for Enterprise Enterprise
Features Certa Third-Party Risk Management 0/5 · GEP SMART Supplier Management 1/5
Vendor portal Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supplier onboarding Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Risk assessments Not checked yet Not checked yet
Compliance tracking Not checked yet Not checked yet
Performance reviews Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Vendor record limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Continuous assessment combines documents, data feeds, and internal systems.
  • AI-assisted questionnaire pre-filling and configurable risk scoring speed reviews.
  • No-code workflows, audit trails, and 130+ native integrations support scale.
  • Centralizes supplier records, registration, qualification, and segmentation
  • Combines onboarding approvals with a supplier portal
  • Tracks performance, risk, compliance, and KPI scorecards
Cons
  • Enterprise-focused workflows may be more than smaller teams need.
  • Pricing is handled through sales rather than a self-serve checkout.
  • Cloud deployment may not suit organizations requiring on-premises hosting.
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Designed for enterprise rather than smaller teams
  • Web-based deployment may not suit teams seeking other platforms
Our verdict

Certa Third-Party Risk Management is a cloud platform for enterprises managing vendors from onboarding through offboarding. It covers vendor onboarding, due diligence, periodic reassessment, continuous risk assessment, evidence collection,…

Read the review →

GEP SMART Supplier Management brings supplier records and lifecycle workflows into a cloud procurement suite for enterprises managing direct and indirect spend. It is aimed at procurement teams that need to organize supplier master data…

Read the review →
  1. Certa Third-Party Risk ManagementVendor Management 8.5Pricing on request
  2. GEP SMART Supplier ManagementVendor Management 8.3Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Certa Third-Party Risk Management — where it wins

    • Continuous assessment combines documents, data feeds, and internal systems.
    • AI-assisted questionnaire pre-filling and configurable risk scoring speed reviews.
    • No-code workflows, audit trails, and 130+ native integrations support scale.

    Where it doesn't

    • Enterprise-focused workflows may be more than smaller teams need.
    • Pricing is handled through sales rather than a self-serve checkout.
    • Cloud deployment may not suit organizations requiring on-premises hosting.
  • GEP SMART Supplier Management — where it wins

    • Centralizes supplier records, registration, qualification, and segmentation
    • Combines onboarding approvals with a supplier portal
    • Tracks performance, risk, compliance, and KPI scorecards

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Designed for enterprise rather than smaller teams
    • Web-based deployment may not suit teams seeking other platforms
  • Certa Third-Party Risk Management8.5/10 · Pricing on request

    Configurable enterprise workflows combine continuous assessment, AI questionnaires, and 130+ integrations.

    Visit CertaFull verdict →
  • GEP SMART Supplier Management8.3/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad supplier master-data and collaboration suite for enterprise procurement.

    Visit GEPFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update