Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Call Accounting

CDR-Stats vs Call SWEET!

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score CDR-Stats #4 in Call Accounting 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan Visit CDR-Stats
Call SWEET! #6 in Call Accounting 8.0/10 Pricing on request Contact DATEL

CDR-Stats leads on 0 checks, Call SWEET! on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCDR-Stats · 8.7/10
  • Free planonly CDR-Stats

CDR-Stats scores higher on our rubric for call accounting: 8.7 against 8.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

On cost allocation, CDR-Stats gives you Account code where Call SWEET! offers Extension.

CDR-Stats is the better fit for technical teams wanting open CDR analytics. Call SWEET! is the better fit for organizations needing detailed billing and misuse reports.

  • CDR-Stats fits best

    Technical teams wanting open CDR analytics

  • Call SWEET! fits best

    Organizations needing detailed billing and misuse reports

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature CDR-Stats 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Call SWEET! 8.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.0
Ranking #4 in Call Accounting #6 in Call Accounting
Best for Technical teams wanting open CDR analytics Organizations needing detailed billing and misuse reports
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price €59/mo Pricing on request
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted, Cloud
Platforms Web, Linux Web
Support Email, Community, Docs Phone
Integrations 8 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Specs
Call record retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Cost allocation Account code Extension
Report export formats CSV, JSON, HTML, ODS, Excel, YAML PDF, Excel
PBX connection On-premises On-premises
Call data intake CSV, JSON, Excel, YAML, Asterisk, FreeSWITCH, Kamailio, SipWise, Veraz connectors Vendor LAN transfer protocols; direct serial connection; remote hardware buffers; FTP transfers; modem pollable transfers; vendor log-file sharing
Supported currencies Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Mediates and rates calls across multiple tenants and switches.
  • Exports searchable CDRs in CSV, JSON, HTML, ODS, Excel, and YAML.
  • Offers realtime monitoring, cost reports, and configurable fraud alerts.
  • Drill-down reports pair broad metrics with detailed call information.
  • Scheduled PDF or Excel reports can be sent daily, weekly or monthly.
  • Account-code tracking supports billable calls and multiple billing workflows.
Cons
  • Its focus on telecom CDRs may not suit general-purpose call accounting.
  • Managed installation requires a customer-provided Debian server with SSH access.
  • Hosted server specifications vary by plan, and dedicated-server pricing is not stated.
  • Pricing requires contacting DATEL rather than choosing a public plan.
  • Call data collection depends on supported transfer methods and equipment.
  • Its focus is call accounting, not a general-purpose business reporting suite.
Our verdict

CDR-Stats is an open-source web application for mediating, rating, analyzing, and reporting telecom call-detail records. It is aimed at telecom companies and larger organizations that need to account for calls across multiple tenants or…

Read the review →

Call SWEET! gives organizations a browser-based way to account for incoming, outgoing and internal calls. It is suited to sites that need call-level reporting alongside cost allocation, including businesses billing by extension, teams…

Read the review →
  1. CDR-StatsCall Accounting 8.7Free plan
  2. Call SWEET!Call Accounting 8.0Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • CDR-Stats — where it wins

    • Mediates and rates calls across multiple tenants and switches.
    • Exports searchable CDRs in CSV, JSON, HTML, ODS, Excel, and YAML.
    • Offers realtime monitoring, cost reports, and configurable fraud alerts.

    Where it doesn't

    • Its focus on telecom CDRs may not suit general-purpose call accounting.
    • Managed installation requires a customer-provided Debian server with SSH access.
    • Hosted server specifications vary by plan, and dedicated-server pricing is not stated.
  • Call SWEET! — where it wins

    • Drill-down reports pair broad metrics with detailed call information.
    • Scheduled PDF or Excel reports can be sent daily, weekly or monthly.
    • Account-code tracking supports billable calls and multiple billing workflows.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting DATEL rather than choosing a public plan.
    • Call data collection depends on supported transfer methods and equipment.
    • Its focus is call accounting, not a general-purpose business reporting suite.
  • CDR-Stats8.7/10 · Free plan

    CDR-Stats pairs multi-switch CDR analysis with call rating, cost reports, and fraud alerts.

    Visit CDR-StatsFull verdict →
  • Call SWEET!8.0/10 · Pricing on request

    Detailed call reports, billing workflows and misuse monitoring, with sales-led pricing.

    Contact DATELFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update