Head-to-head · One-Page Website Builders
Carrd vs Solo.to
Carrd leads on 1 check, Solo.to on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreCarrd · 9.9/10
- Free planboth
- Free trialonly Carrd
- Most featuresCarrd · 3 of 3
Carrd scores higher on our rubric for one-page website builders: 9.9 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #5.
Carrd leads on site limit: 3 sites versus 1 sites. On analytics level, Solo.to gives you Advanced where Carrd offers None.
Carrd is the better fit for fast, polished one-page sites. Solo.to is the better fit for simple creator pages with many embeds.
- Carrd fits best
Fast, polished one-page sites
- Solo.to fits best
Simple creator pages with many embeds
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Carrd 9.9/10 Visit ↗ | Solo.to 8.4/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Ranking | #1 in One-Page Website Builders | #5 in One-Page Website Builders |
| Best for | Fast, polished one-page sites | Simple creator pages with many embeds |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | $9/yr | $1/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | 7 days | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Mobile |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Integrations | 11 integrations | 35+ integrations |
| Features Carrd 3/3 · Solo.to 2/3 | ||
| Custom domain | ✓ | ✓ |
| Contact forms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom code | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Site limit | 3 sites (best) | 1 sites |
| Section limit | Not checked yet | 25 sections |
| Analytics level | None | Advanced |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Carrd is a web-based builder for creating simple, responsive one-page websites. It suits personal profiles, landing pages, email-capture pages, portfolios, and other compact web experiences. Users can start from templates or a blank page,… Read the review → |
solo.to is a web-based one-page website builder for creators, musicians, artists, businesses, and other users who want a compact online presence. It combines link-in-bio pages with profile content, social links, contact buttons, text… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Carrd — where it wins
- Free plan supports up to three one-page sites
- Custom domains, SSL, forms, and embeds on paid plans
- Integrates with Mailchimp, Stripe, analytics tools, and more
Where it doesn't
- Designed for one-page sites rather than larger site structures
- Pro Lite excludes custom domains, forms, code, and analytics
- Available through the web, with no desktop software option
Solo.to — where it wins
- Supports links, sections, media embeds, forms, and contact buttons
- Offers integrations for music, video, podcasts, forms, and social platforms
- Includes a free-forever Beginner plan with responsive page design
Where it doesn't
- Custom domains are limited to the Professional plan
- The free Beginner plan limits pages to 25 links or sections
- There is no native mobile app; access is through the web
- Carrd9.9/10 · Free plan
A focused, low-cost builder for polished one-page sites and landing pages.
Visit CarrdFull verdict → - Solo.to8.4/10 · Free plan
A creator-focused one-page builder with broad embeds and useful free-plan basics.
Visit solo.toFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Carrd vs Strikingly
- Carrd vs OnePage
- Carrd vs Launchrock
- Carrd vs Parpage
- Carrd vs EventCreate
- Strikingly vs Solo.to
- OnePage vs Solo.to
- Launchrock vs Solo.to
All One-Page website builders comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






