Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Earthwork Estimating Software

Carlson Takeoff vs Kubla Cubed

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Carlson Takeoff #2 in Earthwork Estimating Software 7.9/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Carlson
Kubla Cubed #3 in Earthwork Estimating Software 7.9/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Kubla Cubed

Carlson Takeoff leads on 0 checks, Kubla Cubed on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planonly Kubla Cubed
  • Free trialboth

Carlson Takeoff and Kubla Cubed score identically on our rubric (7.9 out of 10) for earthwork estimating software; Carlson Takeoff sits at #2 and Kubla Cubed at #3 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

Kubla Cubed offers free plan; Carlson Takeoff doesn't.

Carlson Takeoff is the better fit for estimators handling roads, trenches, and cut/fill. Kubla Cubed is the better fit for small teams seeking free terrain and volume modeling.

  • Carlson Takeoff fits best

    Estimators handling roads, trenches, and cut/fill

  • Kubla Cubed fits best

    Small teams seeking free terrain and volume modeling

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Carlson Takeoff 7.9/10 Visit ↗ Kubla Cubed 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.9
Ranking #2 in Earthwork Estimating Software #3 in Earthwork Estimating Software
Best for Estimators handling roads, trenches, and cut/fill Small teams seeking free terrain and volume modeling
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Pricing on request · 30-day trial —
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial 30 days 14 days
Free trial length 30 days 14 days
Deployment Desktop Desktop
Platforms Windows Windows
Support Email, Phone Community, Email
Integrations 5 integrations 1 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Carlson Takeoff 1/3 · Kubla Cubed 1/3
Cut-fill analysis ✓ ✓
Material cost database Not checked yet —
Bid templates Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Takeoff method Both Both
Plan input formats Mixed Mixed
Included projects Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Calculates cut/fill, strata, topsoil, subgrade, and over-excavate volumes
  • Supports road profiles, cross-sections, end-area volumes, and mass haul
  • Exports machine-control surfaces for Topcon, Trimble, and Leica
  • Free plan never expires and supports basic terrain and cut-and-fill work
  • TIN-based phased modeling handles swell, compaction and formation adjustments
  • Imports PDF, DWG/DXF, LandXML and survey data; exports reports and CAD
Cons
  • Windows desktop deployment may not suit teams needing other platforms
  • Pricing requires contacting Carlson Software
  • The CAD engine choice may add setup considerations for some buyers
  • Windows-only desktop deployment limits cross-platform access
  • Free edition has limited features and works as a project reader
  • No material cost database for cost-based estimating
Our verdict

Carlson Takeoff is desktop CAD software for estimating earthwork quantities and preparing data for field stakeout and machine control. It is aimed at estimators working with roads, trenches, cut and fill, and mixed paper and digital plans.…

Read the review →

Kubla Cubed is Windows desktop software for earthwork contractors, estimators, quantity surveyors and civil engineers. It imports site information from PDF and CAD drawings, LandXML, survey points and other data, then creates existing and…

Read the review →
  1. Carlson TakeoffEarthwork Estimating Software 7.9Pricing on request · 30-day trial
  2. Kubla CubedEarthwork Estimating Software 7.9Free plan · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Carlson Takeoff — where it wins

    • Calculates cut/fill, strata, topsoil, subgrade, and over-excavate volumes
    • Supports road profiles, cross-sections, end-area volumes, and mass haul
    • Exports machine-control surfaces for Topcon, Trimble, and Leica

    Where it doesn't

    • Windows desktop deployment may not suit teams needing other platforms
    • Pricing requires contacting Carlson Software
    • The CAD engine choice may add setup considerations for some buyers
  • Kubla Cubed — where it wins

    • Free plan never expires and supports basic terrain and cut-and-fill work
    • TIN-based phased modeling handles swell, compaction and formation adjustments
    • Imports PDF, DWG/DXF, LandXML and survey data; exports reports and CAD

    Where it doesn't

    • Windows-only desktop deployment limits cross-platform access
    • Free edition has limited features and works as a project reader
    • No material cost database for cost-based estimating
  • Carlson Takeoff7.9/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A desktop CAD tool for detailed earthwork quantities, road and trench workflows, and machine-control exports.

    Visit CarlsonFull verdict →
  • Kubla Cubed7.9/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    Free, terrain-focused earthwork estimating with phased cut-and-fill modeling.

    Visit Kubla CubedFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update