Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Electronic Medical Records Software

CareCloud Charts vs Sevocity EHR

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score CareCloud Charts #4 in Electronic Medical Records Software 8.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 5 features Visit CareCloud
Sevocity EHR #5 in Electronic Medical Records Software 7.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 5 features Visit Sevocity

CareCloud Charts leads on 0 checks, Sevocity EHR on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCareCloud Charts · 8.0/10
  • Most featuresSevocity EHR · 3 of 5

CareCloud Charts scores higher on our rubric for electronic medical records software: 8.0 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

CareCloud Charts is the better fit for cardiology practices using diagnostic-device data. Sevocity EHR is the better fit for small practices needing broad specialty support.

  • CareCloud Charts fits best

    Cardiology practices using diagnostic-device data

  • Sevocity EHR fits best

    Small practices needing broad specialty support

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature CareCloud Charts 8.0/10 Visit ↗ Sevocity EHR 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.0 7.9
Ranking #4 in Electronic Medical Records Software #5 in Electronic Medical Records Software
Best for Cardiology practices using diagnostic-device data Small practices needing broad specialty support
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web, Windows, macOS
Support Phone, Live chat, Docs Phone, Live chat · 24/7
Integrations 3 integrations 9 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features CareCloud Charts 1/5 · Sevocity EHR 3/5
E-prescribing Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Patient portal Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Telehealth visits Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Appointment scheduling Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specialty templates ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Our review
Pros
  • Cardiology templates support structured documentation and flexible charting.
  • ECG, echocardiography, and stress-test data can appear in patient charts.
  • Includes cardiology coding, billing, analytics, and remote monitoring workflows.
  • Clinical content and templates span more than 40 specialties.
  • Includes e-prescribing, telehealth, portal, interfaces and quality reporting.
  • 24/7 phone and chat support with optional billing and revenue-cycle tools.
Cons
  • Pricing is customized, so practices must contact sales for a quote.
  • Device integrations are specified for ECG, echocardiography, and stress tests.
  • Its specialty-focused workflows may not suit practices seeking a general-purpose EHR.
  • Pricing requires a demo or sales discussion.
  • Its broad configuration may require planning during onboarding.
  • Optional practice-management features add scope beyond core EHR needs.
Our verdict

CareCloud Charts is a cloud-based electronic health record for medical practices, with a cardiology offering built around specialty templates and structured charting. It is aimed at cardiology practices that want ECG, echocardiography, and…

Read the review →

Sevocity EHR is a cloud-based electronic medical record for independent outpatient practices and specialty clinics. It supports solo providers, small groups and mid-market practices with customizable provider templates, flowsheets and…

Read the review →
  1. CareCloud ChartsElectronic Medical Records Software 8.0Pricing on request
  2. Sevocity EHRElectronic Medical Records Software 7.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • CareCloud Charts — where it wins

    • Cardiology templates support structured documentation and flexible charting.
    • ECG, echocardiography, and stress-test data can appear in patient charts.
    • Includes cardiology coding, billing, analytics, and remote monitoring workflows.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is customized, so practices must contact sales for a quote.
    • Device integrations are specified for ECG, echocardiography, and stress tests.
    • Its specialty-focused workflows may not suit practices seeking a general-purpose EHR.
  • Sevocity EHR — where it wins

    • Clinical content and templates span more than 40 specialties.
    • Includes e-prescribing, telehealth, portal, interfaces and quality reporting.
    • 24/7 phone and chat support with optional billing and revenue-cycle tools.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a demo or sales discussion.
    • Its broad configuration may require planning during onboarding.
    • Optional practice-management features add scope beyond core EHR needs.
  • CareCloud Charts8.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A cardiology-focused EHR for practices that need device-linked charting and coding workflows.

    Visit CareCloudFull verdict →
  • Sevocity EHR7.9/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad specialty coverage and configurable workflows for independent practices.

    Visit SevocityFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update