Head-to-head · Bare Metal as a Service (BMaaS) Software
Canonical MAAS vs MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator
Canonical MAAS leads on 0 checks, MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreCanonical MAAS · 9.4/10
- Free planonly Canonical MAAS
Canonical MAAS scores higher on our rubric for bare metal as a service (bmaas) software: 9.4 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #5.
Canonical MAAS is the better fit for teams automating bare-metal fleets at scale. MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator is the better fit for multi-site lifecycle orchestration with self-service.
- Canonical MAAS fits best
Teams automating bare-metal fleets at scale
- MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator fits best
Multi-site lifecycle orchestration with self-service
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Canonical MAAS 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator 7.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 7.8 |
| Ranking | #1 in Bare Metal as a Service (BMaaS) Software | #5 in Bare Metal as a Service (BMaaS) Software |
| Best for | Teams automating bare-metal fleets at scale | Multi-site lifecycle orchestration with self-service |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $30/device/yr | Pricing on request |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Web |
| Support | Phone, Tickets, Docs · 24/7 | Email, Tickets, Docs · 24/7 |
| Compliance | SSO/SAML | SSO/SAML |
| Integrations | 5 integrations | 11 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Canonical MAAS 0/3 · MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator 0/3 | ||
| Lifecycle automation | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| OS imaging | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Network configuration | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Provisioning method | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Deployment model | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Hypervisor support | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Canonical MAAS is open-source infrastructure software for discovering, commissioning, deploying, and managing physical servers. It is aimed at infrastructure teams, data-center operators, DevOps engineers, and organizations running server… Read the review → |
MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator provisions, re-provisions, and manages general-purpose and specialized physical servers across vendors. It is aimed at mid-market and enterprise teams operating on-premises, edge, hybrid, AI, or HPC… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Canonical MAAS — where it wins
- Automates discovery, commissioning, deployment, allocation, and release
- Combines BMC power control with DHCP, DNS, IPAM, VLAN, and subnet management
- Supports varied storage layouts, OS images, and HA region and rack controllers
Where it doesn't
- Self-hosted deployment places infrastructure operations with your team
- Paid support costs scale per managed machine each year
- Standalone support eligibility requires Ubuntu Pro for controllers
MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator — where it wins
- Automates server discovery, enrollment, inventory, and OS deployment.
- Manages firmware baselines and lifecycle workflows across sites.
- Offers self-service access, an OpenAPI REST API, and AI-assisted diagnosis.
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires contacting sales.
- Deployment is self-hosted, not a hosted service.
- Its broad infrastructure scope may exceed simpler server-provisioning needs.
- Canonical MAAS9.4/10 · Free plan
A broad toolkit for automating physical-server lifecycles, with optional per-machine support.
Visit CanonicalFull verdict → - MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator7.8/10 · Pricing on request
Multi-site bare-metal lifecycle orchestration with self-service and automation.
Visit MetalSoftFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Canonical MAAS vs NVIDIA Infra Controller
- Canonical MAAS vs Digital Rebar Provision
- Canonical MAAS vs Metal³
- Canonical MAAS vs xCAT
- Canonical MAAS vs Tinkerbell
- OpenStack Ironic vs MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator
- Digital Rebar Provision vs MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator
- MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator vs Metal³
All bare metal as a service (BMaaS) software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






