Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Bare Metal as a Service (BMaaS) Software

Canonical MAAS vs MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Canonical MAAS #1 in Bare Metal as a Service (BMaaS) Software 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Canonical

Canonical MAAS leads on 0 checks, MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCanonical MAAS · 9.4/10
  • Free planonly Canonical MAAS

Canonical MAAS scores higher on our rubric for bare metal as a service (bmaas) software: 9.4 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #5.

Canonical MAAS is the better fit for teams automating bare-metal fleets at scale. MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator is the better fit for multi-site lifecycle orchestration with self-service.

  • Canonical MAAS fits best

    Teams automating bare-metal fleets at scale

  • MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator fits best

    Multi-site lifecycle orchestration with self-service

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Canonical MAAS 9.4/10 Visit ↗ MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 7.8
Ranking #1 in Bare Metal as a Service (BMaaS) Software #5 in Bare Metal as a Service (BMaaS) Software
Best for Teams automating bare-metal fleets at scale Multi-site lifecycle orchestration with self-service
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $30/device/yr Pricing on request
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Linux Web
Support Phone, Tickets, Docs · 24/7 Email, Tickets, Docs · 24/7
Compliance SSO/SAML SSO/SAML
Integrations 5 integrations 11 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Canonical MAAS 0/3 · MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator 0/3
Lifecycle automation Not checked yet Not checked yet
OS imaging Not checked yet Not checked yet
Network configuration Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Provisioning method Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment model Not checked yet Not checked yet
Hypervisor support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Automates discovery, commissioning, deployment, allocation, and release
  • Combines BMC power control with DHCP, DNS, IPAM, VLAN, and subnet management
  • Supports varied storage layouts, OS images, and HA region and rack controllers
  • Automates server discovery, enrollment, inventory, and OS deployment.
  • Manages firmware baselines and lifecycle workflows across sites.
  • Offers self-service access, an OpenAPI REST API, and AI-assisted diagnosis.
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment places infrastructure operations with your team
  • Paid support costs scale per managed machine each year
  • Standalone support eligibility requires Ubuntu Pro for controllers
  • Pricing requires contacting sales.
  • Deployment is self-hosted, not a hosted service.
  • Its broad infrastructure scope may exceed simpler server-provisioning needs.
Our verdict

Canonical MAAS is open-source infrastructure software for discovering, commissioning, deploying, and managing physical servers. It is aimed at infrastructure teams, data-center operators, DevOps engineers, and organizations running server…

Read the review →

MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator provisions, re-provisions, and manages general-purpose and specialized physical servers across vendors. It is aimed at mid-market and enterprise teams operating on-premises, edge, hybrid, AI, or HPC…

Read the review →
  1. Canonical MAASBare Metal as a Service (BMaaS) Software 9.4Free plan
  2. MetalSoft Bare Metal OrchestratorBare Metal as a Service (BMaaS) Software 7.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Canonical MAAS — where it wins

    • Automates discovery, commissioning, deployment, allocation, and release
    • Combines BMC power control with DHCP, DNS, IPAM, VLAN, and subnet management
    • Supports varied storage layouts, OS images, and HA region and rack controllers

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment places infrastructure operations with your team
    • Paid support costs scale per managed machine each year
    • Standalone support eligibility requires Ubuntu Pro for controllers
  • MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator — where it wins

    • Automates server discovery, enrollment, inventory, and OS deployment.
    • Manages firmware baselines and lifecycle workflows across sites.
    • Offers self-service access, an OpenAPI REST API, and AI-assisted diagnosis.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales.
    • Deployment is self-hosted, not a hosted service.
    • Its broad infrastructure scope may exceed simpler server-provisioning needs.
  • Canonical MAAS9.4/10 · Free plan

    A broad toolkit for automating physical-server lifecycles, with optional per-machine support.

    Visit CanonicalFull verdict →
  • MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator7.8/10 · Pricing on request

    Multi-site bare-metal lifecycle orchestration with self-service and automation.

    Visit MetalSoftFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update