Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Calibration Management Software

Beamex CMX vs Fluke MET/TEAM

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Beamex CMX #3 in Calibration Management Software 9.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Beamex
Fluke MET/TEAM #6 in Calibration Management Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request · 60-day trial Free trial✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Fluke

Beamex CMX leads on 0 checks, Fluke MET/TEAM on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBeamex CMX · 9.1/10
  • Free trialonly Fluke MET/TEAM
  • Most featuresFluke MET/TEAM · 5 of 5

Beamex CMX scores higher on our rubric for calibration management software: 9.1 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.

Beamex CMX is the better fit for mature industrial calibration programs. Fluke MET/TEAM is the better fit for established organizations needing barcode workflows.

  • Beamex CMX fits best

    Mature industrial calibration programs

  • Fluke MET/TEAM fits best

    Established organizations needing barcode workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Beamex CMX 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Fluke MET/TEAM 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 8.8
Ranking #3 in Calibration Management Software #6 in Calibration Management Software
Best for Mature industrial calibration programs Established organizations needing barcode workflows
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request · 60-day trial
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — 60 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop, Mobile Cloud, Self-hosted, Mobile
Support Tickets, Docs Email, Phone, Tickets, Docs
Compliance SSO/SAML SSO/SAML
Integrations 5 integrations 3 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Beamex CMX 4/5 · Fluke MET/TEAM 5/5
Calibration scheduling ✓ ✓
Certificate management ✓ ✓
Audit trail ✓ ✓
Standards traceability ✓ ✓
Barcode or QR scanning Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Asset limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mobile support Native Native
Our review
Pros
  • Covers assets, scheduling, procedures, certificates, uncertainty, and audit trails
  • Supports electronic signatures and 21 CFR Part 11 requirements
  • Offline mobile calibration with bMobile plus SAP, Maximo, and Infor integrations
  • Barcode asset identification supports equipment tracking workflows.
  • Work orders, scheduling, certificates, and recalls are managed in one system.
  • Self-hosted deployment and integrations add platform flexibility.
Cons
  • Pricing is quote-based rather than published as fixed plans
  • Its broad compliance and asset features may exceed simpler program needs
  • Professional and Enterprise editions require evaluation to choose the right fit
  • Pricing requires contacting sales rather than selecting a public plan.
  • Mobile functionality is available as an optional module.
  • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of simple scheduling teams.
Our verdict

Beamex CMX is calibration management software for organizations managing instrumentation assets and recurring calibration work. It brings asset records, calibration planning, work-order automation, reference equipment intervals, guided…

Read the review →

Fluke MET/TEAM is browser-based calibration management software for calibration laboratories, quality departments, service organizations, and industrial teams. It manages instrumentation assets, contacts, facilities, work orders,…

Read the review →
  1. Beamex CMXCalibration Management Software 9.1Pricing on request
  2. Fluke MET/TEAMCalibration Management Software 8.8Pricing on request · 60-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Beamex CMX — where it wins

    • Covers assets, scheduling, procedures, certificates, uncertainty, and audit trails
    • Supports electronic signatures and 21 CFR Part 11 requirements
    • Offline mobile calibration with bMobile plus SAP, Maximo, and Infor integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is quote-based rather than published as fixed plans
    • Its broad compliance and asset features may exceed simpler program needs
    • Professional and Enterprise editions require evaluation to choose the right fit
  • Fluke MET/TEAM — where it wins

    • Barcode asset identification supports equipment tracking workflows.
    • Work orders, scheduling, certificates, and recalls are managed in one system.
    • Self-hosted deployment and integrations add platform flexibility.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales rather than selecting a public plan.
    • Mobile functionality is available as an optional module.
    • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of simple scheduling teams.
  • Beamex CMX9.1/10 · Pricing on request

    A mature CMMS-integrated system for complex, compliance-focused calibration programs.

    Visit BeamexFull verdict →
  • Fluke MET/TEAM8.8/10 · Pricing on request · 60-day trial

    A broad calibration system for organizations that need barcode-driven workflows and audit-ready records.

    Visit FlukeFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update