Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · WordPress Themes

Avada vs Porto

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score Avada #4 in WordPress Themes 9.0/10 Paid ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Avada
Porto #7 in WordPress Themes 8.7/10 Paid ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Porto

Avada leads on 1 check, Porto on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAvada · 9.0/10

Avada scores higher on our rubric for wordpress themes: 9.0 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.

On theme type, Porto gives you Hybrid where Avada offers Classic. Avada leads on starter sites: 113 sites versus 105 sites.

Avada is the better fit for visual all-in-one site building. Porto is the better fit for feature-rich business and store sites.

  • Avada fits best

    Visual all-in-one site building

  • Porto fits best

    Feature-rich business and store sites

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Avada 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Porto 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.7
Ranking #4 in WordPress Themes #7 in WordPress Themes
Best for Visual all-in-one site building Feature-rich business and store sites
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — —
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Live chat, Tickets, Community, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 10 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Avada 5/5 · Porto 5/5
WooCommerce support ✓ ✓
Block editor support ✓ ✓
Child theme support ✓ ✓
RTL support ✓ ✓
Accessibility ready ✓ ✓
Specs
Theme type Classic Hybrid
Starter sites 113 sites (best) 105 sites
Our review
Pros
  • Visual builders cover layouts, headers, footers, shops, forms, and menus
  • Includes 113 prebuilt websites and 639 reusable content items
  • Lifetime updates with six months of support
  • Supports WooCommerce, Gutenberg, Elementor, and WPBakery
  • Includes 105 starter sites and demo-import tools
  • Builds headers, footers, archives, and product layouts
Cons
  • No free plan for evaluating the product
  • The broad toolset may exceed the needs of simple sites
  • Uses a paid one-time license rather than a free entry tier
  • No free plan is available
  • The broad feature set may be more than simple sites need
  • Licensing is organized by website count and term
Our verdict

Avada is a paid WordPress theme and website builder for beginners, marketers, freelancers, agencies, and professionals. Its visual drag-and-drop builder supports custom layouts, headers, footers, forms, WooCommerce stores, off-canvas…

Read the review →

Porto is a premium, self-hosted WordPress theme for businesses, agencies, freelancers, and online stores. Its hybrid approach combines full-site editing, Gutenberg and block API support, Elementor and WPBakery compatibility, WooCommerce…

Read the review →
  1. AvadaWordPress Themes 9.0Paid
  2. PortoWordPress Themes 8.7Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Avada — where it wins

    • Visual builders cover layouts, headers, footers, shops, forms, and menus
    • Includes 113 prebuilt websites and 639 reusable content items
    • Lifetime updates with six months of support

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan for evaluating the product
    • The broad toolset may exceed the needs of simple sites
    • Uses a paid one-time license rather than a free entry tier
  • Porto — where it wins

    • Supports WooCommerce, Gutenberg, Elementor, and WPBakery
    • Includes 105 starter sites and demo-import tools
    • Builds headers, footers, archives, and product layouts

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is available
    • The broad feature set may be more than simple sites need
    • Licensing is organized by website count and term

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update