Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Simulation & CAE Software

Autodesk Moldflow vs MSC Actran

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Autodesk Moldflow #4 in Simulation & CAE Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial Visit Autodesk
MSC Actran #8 in Simulation & CAE Software 8.3/10 Pricing on request Visit Hexagon

Autodesk Moldflow leads on 0 checks, MSC Actran on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAutodesk Moldflow · 8.7/10
  • Free trialonly Autodesk Moldflow

Autodesk Moldflow scores higher on our rubric for simulation & cae software: 8.7 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

Autodesk Moldflow is the better fit for plastic-part and mold design teams. MSC Actran is the better fit for acoustic and vibro-acoustic analysis teams.

  • Autodesk Moldflow fits best

    Plastic-part and mold design teams

  • MSC Actran fits best

    Acoustic and vibro-acoustic analysis teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Autodesk Moldflow 8.7/10 Visit ↗ MSC Actran 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.3
Ranking #4 in Simulation & CAE Software #8 in Simulation & CAE Software
Best for Plastic-part and mold design teams Acoustic and vibro-acoustic analysis teams
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request · 30-day trial Pricing on request
Free plan — —
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Desktop, Cloud Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, Linux Windows, Linux
Support Docs · 24/7 Tickets, Community, Docs
Integrations 3 integrations 1 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Specs
Simulation types Not checked yet Acoustic, vibro-acoustic, aero-acoustic
Solver types Not checked yet Radiosity
Cloud access Not checked yet Desktop
Supported platforms Not checked yet Windows, Linux
CAD file formats Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment options Not checked yet On-premises
Our review
Pros
  • Analyzes filling, packing, cooling, and deflection for injection and compression molding.
  • Flags potential sink marks, weld lines, and warpage; includes automated meshing.
  • Insight adds local, remote, or cloud solving and optimization tools.
  • Models turbulent-flow noise and its interaction with vibrating structures
  • Supports duct propagation with shear and swirl flow effects
  • Works with Nastran structural models and modal bases
Cons
  • Focused on molding analysis rather than general-purpose CAE.
  • Subscription pricing requires contacting Autodesk sales.
  • Moldflow Adviser is Windows-only; Linux support is for Insight and Synergy.
  • Specialized scope may not suit broader simulation needs
  • Requires an on-premises installation on Windows or Linux
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
Our verdict

Autodesk Moldflow is a simulation product family for engineers, analysts, and mold designers evaluating plastic-part manufacturability and molded-part quality. Its scope centers on injection and compression molding, with analysis spanning…

Read the review →

MSC Actran is Hexagon’s licensed software suite for acoustic, vibro-acoustic and aero-acoustic modeling. It is aimed at engineering teams analyzing sound, vibration-related acoustics and noise prediction, with applications described for…

Read the review →
  1. Autodesk MoldflowSimulation & CAE Software 8.7Pricing on request · 30-day trial
  2. MSC ActranSimulation & CAE Software 8.3Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Autodesk Moldflow — where it wins

    • Analyzes filling, packing, cooling, and deflection for injection and compression molding.
    • Flags potential sink marks, weld lines, and warpage; includes automated meshing.
    • Insight adds local, remote, or cloud solving and optimization tools.

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on molding analysis rather than general-purpose CAE.
    • Subscription pricing requires contacting Autodesk sales.
    • Moldflow Adviser is Windows-only; Linux support is for Insight and Synergy.

  • MSC Actran — where it wins

    • Models turbulent-flow noise and its interaction with vibrating structures
    • Supports duct propagation with shear and swirl flow effects
    • Works with Nastran structural models and modal bases

    Where it doesn't

    • Specialized scope may not suit broader simulation needs
    • Requires an on-premises installation on Windows or Linux
    • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Autodesk Moldflow8.7/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    Focused molding analysis for teams assessing plastic-part manufacturability and quality.

    Visit AutodeskFull verdict →
  • MSC Actran8.3/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused desktop suite for acoustic, vibro-acoustic and aero-acoustic engineering.

    Visit HexagonFull verdict →

More comparisons

All simulation & CAE software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update