Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Qualitative Data Analysis Software

ATLAS.ti vs Quirkos

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score ATLAS.ti #2 in Qualitative Data Analysis Software 9.1/10 20-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 5 features Visit ATLAS.ti
Quirkos #6 in Qualitative Data Analysis Software 8.2/10 14-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Quirkos

ATLAS.ti leads on 0 checks, Quirkos on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreATLAS.ti · 9.1/10
  • Free trialboth

ATLAS.ti scores higher on our rubric for qualitative data analysis software: 9.1 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

ATLAS.ti is the better fit for teams analyzing varied media with AI assistance. Quirkos is the better fit for budget-conscious researchers needing flexible access.

  • ATLAS.ti fits best

    Teams analyzing varied media with AI assistance

  • Quirkos fits best

    Budget-conscious researchers needing flexible access

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ATLAS.ti 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Quirkos 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 8.2
Ranking #2 in Qualitative Data Analysis Software #6 in Qualitative Data Analysis Software
Best for Teams analyzing varied media with AI assistance Budget-conscious researchers needing flexible access
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price 20-day trial $5/mo
Free plan — —
Free trial 20 days 14 days
Free trial length 20 days · no card needed 14 days · card required
Deployment Cloud, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop, Mobile
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
Support Email, Docs Email, Phone, Docs
Compliance GDPR ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features ATLAS.ti 0/5 · Quirkos 0/5
Coding tools Not checked yet Not checked yet
Audio/video analysis Not checked yet Not checked yet
Team collaboration Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mixed-methods analysis Not checked yet Not checked yet
Transcription included Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Supported platforms Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Analyzes text, PDFs, images, audio, video, surveys, and geographic data
  • AI tools cover coding, transcription, document queries, sentiment, and entities
  • Web collaboration alongside native Windows and macOS apps
  • Hierarchical coding, comparisons, annotations and visualisations in one workspace
  • Cloud collaboration plus offline desktop storage across major operating systems
  • Imports and exports support Word, PDF, Excel, CSV, HTML and common QDA tools
Cons
  • No free plan; evaluation is limited to five active-use days in a 20-day period
  • AI-assisted analysis may not suit teams that prefer fully manual workflows
  • Email and documentation are the listed support channels
  • No free plan, and the 14-day cloud trial requires credit-card details
  • Automated transcription is limited to 100 free minutes on selected cloud plans
  • No built-in AI features such as sentiment analysis or topic modeling
Our verdict

Researchers working across interviews, surveys, documents, and media can use ATLAS.ti to organize material, code passages, compare data, and create visualizations. It serves students, universities, marketers, UX professionals, and data…

Read the review →

Quirkos is qualitative data analysis software for researchers, educators and research teams working with documents, conversations, surveys, audio or video transcripts. It supports grouped and hierarchical themes, source annotations,…

Read the review →
  1. ATLAS.tiQualitative Data Analysis Software 9.120-day trial
  2. QuirkosQualitative Data Analysis Software 8.214-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ATLAS.ti — where it wins

    • Analyzes text, PDFs, images, audio, video, surveys, and geographic data
    • AI tools cover coding, transcription, document queries, sentiment, and entities
    • Web collaboration alongside native Windows and macOS apps

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; evaluation is limited to five active-use days in a 20-day period
    • AI-assisted analysis may not suit teams that prefer fully manual workflows
    • Email and documentation are the listed support channels
  • Quirkos — where it wins

    • Hierarchical coding, comparisons, annotations and visualisations in one workspace
    • Cloud collaboration plus offline desktop storage across major operating systems
    • Imports and exports support Word, PDF, Excel, CSV, HTML and common QDA tools

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan, and the 14-day cloud trial requires credit-card details
    • Automated transcription is limited to 100 free minutes on selected cloud plans
    • No built-in AI features such as sentiment analysis or topic modeling
  • ATLAS.ti9.1/10 · 20-day trial

    A broad qualitative analysis toolkit with AI assistance and Web collaboration.

    Visit ATLAS.tiFull verdict →
  • Quirkos8.2/10 · 14-day trial

    Flexible qualitative analysis across cloud, desktop and mobile, with affordable student pricing.

    Visit QuirkosFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update