Head-to-head · Fitness Class Scheduling Software
Arketa vs DANZ
Arketa leads on 0 checks, DANZ on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreArketa · 9.1/10
Arketa scores higher on our rubric for fitness class scheduling software: 9.1 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.
Arketa is the better fit for studios wanting strong features at a clear entry price. DANZ is the better fit for dance studios needing deep scheduling and payroll tools.
- Arketa fits best
Studios wanting strong features at a clear entry price
- DANZ fits best
Dance studios needing deep scheduling and payroll tools
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Arketa 9.1/10 Visit ↗ | DANZ 8.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Ranking | #3 in Fitness Class Scheduling Software | #6 in Fitness Class Scheduling Software |
| Best for | Studios wanting strong features at a clear entry price | Dance studios needing deep scheduling and payroll tools |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $49/mo | €49/mo |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Mobile | Cloud, Desktop, Mobile |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android |
| Integrations | 6 integrations | 5 integrations |
| Features Arketa 4/4 · DANZ 4/4 | ||
| Instructor scheduling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Capacity management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Class waitlists | ✓ | ✓ |
| Recurring classes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Locations included | 1 | Not checked yet |
| Booking channels | Web_and_mobile | Web_and_mobile |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Arketa is business management software for fitness and wellness studios that need scheduling, client management, memberships, payments, attendance, and growth tools in one system. It supports group classes, private appointments, events,… Read the review → |
DANZ is a paid SaaS platform for dance schools managing recurring classes, bookings, attendance, payments, events and teacher administration. It suits studios that need more than a basic timetable, especially those coordinating teachers,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Arketa — where it wins
- Scheduling, waitlists, memberships, payments, and attendance in one platform
- Individual starts at $49 per month with annual billing
- Web, iOS, Android, and integrations including Stripe, Zoom, and Zapier
Where it doesn't
- The Individual plan includes only 1 team member login
- Studio Core, Growth, and Suite use custom pricing
- Branded mobile apps are available only with Studio Suite
DANZ — where it wins
- Recurring schedules with capacity controls and automatic waitlist promotion
- QR attendance deducts credits and supports class cards and subscriptions
- Teacher payroll, payslips, dashboards and role-specific interfaces
Where it doesn't
- No free plan or time-limited trial
- Focused on dance-school operations rather than broad fitness use
- Concierge support is tied to a quarterly €149/month plan
- Arketa9.1/10 · Paid
A broad studio platform with a clear $49 annual-billing entry plan and custom-priced upgrades.
Visit ArketaFull verdict → - DANZ8.8/10 · Paid
DANZ brings scheduling, attendance, payments and payroll into one dance-school platform.
Visit DANZFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Eversports Manager vs Arketa
- Eversports Manager vs DANZ
- bsport vs Arketa
- bsport vs DANZ
- Arketa vs Glofox
- Arketa vs Gymcatch
- Arketa vs Fitli
- Arketa vs LegitFit
All fitness class scheduling software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







