Head-to-head · Multi-Factor Authentication Software
Akamai MFA vs FortiAuthenticator
Akamai MFA leads on 0 checks, FortiAuthenticator on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreAkamai MFA · 8.6/10
- Free trialonly Akamai MFA
- Most featuresFortiAuthenticator · 3 of 3
Akamai MFA scores higher on our rubric for multi-factor authentication software: 8.6 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #8.
On deployment, FortiAuthenticator gives you Hybrid where Akamai MFA offers Cloud.
Akamai MFA is the better fit for mature adaptive MFA with strong device controls. FortiAuthenticator is the better fit for self-hosted MFA for network-heavy environments.
- Akamai MFA fits best
Mature adaptive MFA with strong device controls
- FortiAuthenticator fits best
Self-hosted MFA for network-heavy environments
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Akamai MFA 8.6/10 Visit ↗ | FortiAuthenticator 8.5/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Ranking | #7 in Multi-Factor Authentication Software | #8 in Multi-Factor Authentication Software |
| Best for | Mature adaptive MFA with strong device controls | Self-hosted MFA for network-heavy environments |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Pricing on request · 30-day trial | Pricing on request |
| Free plan | — | Not checked yet |
| Free trial | 30 days | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Mobile, Browser extension | Self-hosted, Cloud |
| Support | Docs, Community | Docs |
| Integrations | 9 integrations | 8 integrations |
| Built for | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Akamai MFA 2/3 · FortiAuthenticator 3/3 | ||
| Adaptive access policies | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passwordless authentication | ✓ | ✓ |
| Device trust controls | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment | Cloud | Hybrid |
| Supported factors | Phone security key (FIDO2), security key, platform authenticator, passkey, push notification, TOTP, email or SMS OTP, hardware-token TOTP/HOTP, phone-call OTP, magic link, bypass code, third-party authenticator OTP | Password; FortiToken hardware; FortiToken Mobile; SMS; email; FIDO2 security keys/passkeys |
| App integration methods | SAML 2.0; PacketFence Gateway using RADIUS, LDAP, or Active Directory; Unix PAM; Windows Logon; APIs | RADIUS; TACACS+; LDAP; SAML; REST API; Fortinet Security Fabric |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Akamai MFA is a cloud workforce multi-factor authentication service for organizations protecting cloud, on-premises, web, SaaS, and IaaS applications. It adds secondary authentication to existing identity-provider workflows and supports… Read the review → |
FortiAuthenticator is Fortinet’s identity and access management solution for enterprises that need centralized authentication across networks, VPNs, applications, and cloud services. It combines multi-factor authentication, single sign-on,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Akamai MFA — where it wins
- Supports passkeys, FIDO2 phone keys, push, OTPs, and hardware tokens.
- Applies policies across devices, locations, browsers, networks, and operating systems.
- Integrates with major identity providers, Windows, Unix PAM, RADIUS, LDAP, and APIs.
Where it doesn't
- Paid pricing requires a contract or sales contact.
- The breadth of controls may exceed the needs of smaller deployments.
- No free plan is offered; the advertised trial lasts 30 days.
FortiAuthenticator — where it wins
- Supports mobile push, hardware tokens, OTP, certificates, and FIDO2
- Connects with RADIUS, TACACS+, SAML, OIDC, LDAP, APIs, and 802.1X
- Adds adaptive access, trusted endpoints, certificates, and high availability
Where it doesn't
- Its broad enterprise scope may exceed smaller teams' requirements
- Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure and administrative ownership
- Certificate, directory, and protocol configuration can add implementation complexity
- Akamai MFA8.6/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial
A broad MFA service for organizations needing adaptive access and device controls.
Visit Akamai MFAFull verdict → - FortiAuthenticator8.5/10 · Pricing on request
A broad self-hosted MFA platform for complex networks, directories, certificates, and SSO.
Visit FortinetFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Cisco Duo Passwordless vs Akamai MFA
- Cisco Duo Passwordless vs FortiAuthenticator
- miniOrange Multi-Factor Authentication vs Akamai MFA
- miniOrange Multi-Factor Authentication vs FortiAuthenticator
- LoginTC vs Akamai MFA
- LoginTC vs FortiAuthenticator
- Rublon MFA vs Akamai MFA
- Rublon MFA vs FortiAuthenticator
All Multi-Factor authentication software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




