Acumatica Cannabis Edition vs BioTrack

Acumatica Cannabis Edition8.2Visit BioTrack7.3Visit

Higher score Acumatica Cannabis Edition #2 in Cannabis Industry Software 8.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Acumatica

vs

BioTrack #5 in Cannabis Industry Software 7.3/10 Paid ✓ 2 of 2 features Visit BioTrack

• Acumatica Cannabis Edition fits best

  Growing operators needing ERP controls

• BioTrack fits best

  Regulated operators with multi-workflow needs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Acumatica Cannabis Edition 8.2/10 Visit ↗	BioTrack 7.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.2	7.3
Ranking	#2 in Cannabis Industry Software	#5 in Cannabis Industry Software
Best for	Growing operators needing ERP controls	Regulated operators with multi-workflow needs
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	Not published	Not published
Free plan	Not published	Not published
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud, Self-hosted	Cloud
Platforms	Web	Web
Support	Email, Live chat, Phone, Community, Docs · 24/7	Phone
Integrations	162+ integrations	2 integrations
Built for	Small business, Mid-market	Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Acumatica Cannabis Edition 2/2 · BioTrack 2/2
Seed-to-sale tracking	✓	✓
Dispensary POS	✓	✓
Specs
Business workflows	Multi-workflow	Multi-workflow
Regulatory tracking	Multi-jurisdiction	Multi-jurisdiction
Listed integrations	162	Not published
Mobile access	Web	Web
Our review
Pros	Connects seed-to-sale traceability with cultivation, production and lot tracking Combines manufacturing, warehouse, quality and financial workflows Supports METRC, BioTrack, Leaf Data and Health Canada integrations	Tracks inventory from cultivation through sale Combines cultivation, manufacturing, POS and transport workflows Supports government reporting, QA tracking and manifests
Cons	Cannabis POS depends on integrated applications and partners Custom, consumption-based pricing makes upfront plan comparisons difficult Its broad ERP scope may exceed the needs of single-workflow operators	Web-only access may not suit teams needing mobile apps Documented integrations are Cannalytics and Alleaves Commercial pricing varies by jurisdiction and contract
Our verdict	Acumatica Cannabis Edition brings seed-to-sale tracking and broader ERP workflows together for cannabis, hemp and CBD cultivators, processors, manufacturers, distributors and dispensaries. Its scope extends from cultivation and production… Read the review →	BioTrack is seed-to-sale software for cultivators, processors, manufacturers, dispensaries and government regulators. It brings cultivation, production, inventory, transportation, testing, dispensing, regulatory reporting and dispensary… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Acumatica Cannabis Edition — where it wins

  • Connects seed-to-sale traceability with cultivation, production and lot tracking
  • Combines manufacturing, warehouse, quality and financial workflows
  • Supports METRC, BioTrack, Leaf Data and Health Canada integrations

  Where it doesn't

  • Cannabis POS depends on integrated applications and partners
  • Custom, consumption-based pricing makes upfront plan comparisons difficult
  • Its broad ERP scope may exceed the needs of single-workflow operators

• BioTrack — where it wins

  • Tracks inventory from cultivation through sale
  • Combines cultivation, manufacturing, POS and transport workflows
  • Supports government reporting, QA tracking and manifests

  Where it doesn't

  • Web-only access may not suit teams needing mobile apps
  • Documented integrations are Cannalytics and Alleaves
  • Commercial pricing varies by jurisdiction and contract

• Acumatica Cannabis Edition8.2/10 · Pricing on request

  Broad operational and financial controls, with POS supplied through connected applications.

  Visit AcumaticaFull verdict →
• BioTrack7.3/10 · Paid

  A web-based system covering cannabis operations, traceability, POS and compliance reporting.

  Visit BioTrackFull verdict →