What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
A 2025 study reports a laboratory process that extracts water from simulated lunar soil and uses it in photothermal carbon-dioxide conversion. The researchers identify oxygen, hydrogen and carbon monoxide among the products. This is a potential route for using local lunar resources—not evidence that a working plant has made rocket propellant on the Moon.
What did the researchers demonstrate?
The paper, “Inherent lunar water enabled photothermal CO₂ catalysis,” was published in Joule on July 16, 2025. Its approach integrates water extraction from simulated Chang’e lunar soil with photothermal catalysis of carbon dioxide. The journal summary names oxygen, hydrogen and carbon monoxide as products. Read the study in Joule.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Metal Earth Apollo Lunar Module 3D Metal Model Kit Fascinations | $11.95 | Buy on Amazon |
In practical terms, the work explores whether lunar soil could supply water and whether that water could be incorporated into a process that turns carbon dioxide into useful chemical products. It does not show that the team produced finished rocket propellant, operated the process on the Moon, or built a flight-ready fuel system. “Rocket fuel” is therefore a prospective implication of making useful inputs and products in space, not a description of a demonstrated lunar fuel plant.
What do oxygen, hydrogen and carbon monoxide mean for lunar resource use?
Oxygen and hydrogen are relevant to space exploration because they can serve as useful resources, while carbon monoxide is a chemical product of the reported conversion process. The study points toward a possible in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) pathway: using materials available at a destination rather than transporting every resource from Earth. Whether this particular process can support a practical mission depends on its performance and on the engineering needed to operate it in lunar conditions.
#1 Best Overall
- HOBBY MODEL KIT – Unassembled model packed in an envelope with easy to follow instructions. Ideal for ages 14 and up
- NO GLUE OR SOLDER NEEDED – Parts can be easily clipped from the metal sheets. Tweezers are the recommended tool for bending and twisting the connection tabs
- APOLLO LUNAR MODULE – 2 Sheet Model with a moderate difficulty level. Once assembled, dimensions are 2.34 x 2.34 x 2.15 inches.
- FROM STEEL SHEETS TO 3D – Pop out the pieces and connect using tabs and holes. Includes illustrated instructions
- HIGHLY DETAILED ETCHED MODEL – Display your 3D model once completed - collect and build them all
The available description does not establish a verified production rate, efficiency or mass yield for the Joule study, so those figures should not be inferred from other lunar-resource experiments. The reported products alone do not show how much could be made, how much energy the process needs, or whether its outputs meet the requirements of a propulsion system.
What has—and has not—been tested?
The integrated process was evaluated using simulated lunar soil. The cited material does not establish an integrated test on the lunar surface, a test with actual returned lunar samples, or operation as an autonomous lunar plant. Laboratory feasibility is an important early step, but it is not the same as demonstrating reliable production in lunar vacuum, temperature extremes, dust and operational constraints.
The authors’ broader caution is that technical hurdles and the costs of development, deployment and operation must be overcome before sustainable lunar water use becomes practical. Cell Press’s release via EurekAlert discusses the study and its limitations.
How does this compare with other lunar-soil experiments?
Several studies investigate using lunar soil or its simulants, but they use different processes and report different products. Their results should not be combined as if they came from one system.
| Work | Process and material | Reported products or result | Test context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joule, July 2025 | Photothermal water extraction and CO₂ catalysis using simulated Chang’e lunar soil | Oxygen, hydrogen and carbon monoxide; no verified output rate or efficiency stated in the available study description | Laboratory study; no lunar deployment established. Study |
| NASA Carbothermal Reduction Demonstration, reported 2023 | Carbothermal reduction, heating lunar-soil simulant with a high-powered laser in a reactor | NASA reported extracting oxygen and detecting carbon monoxide | Simulant tested in a vacuum chamber. This is a separate demonstration, not the Joule photothermal system. NASA report |
| National Science Review, February 2023 | Electrocatalytic CO₂ conversion using copper-loaded lunar-soil materials | Methane and oxygen. The paper reports 72.05% methane Faradaic efficiency, methane production of 0.8 mL/min at 600 mA/cm², and simultaneous oxygen production of 2.3 mL/min. | A separate electrocatalytic study; these measurements are not results from the Joule paper. Study |
| ACS Materials Letters, 2025 | Joule heating to process lunar-soil minerals for water electrolysis; commercial simulants were used in experimental preparation | Water-electrolysis research; the cited material does not establish that it is the integrated photothermal CO₂ process | A separate study, published online January 10, 2025, and in the February 3 issue. Study |
The comparison shows why a result from one experiment cannot fill a missing performance figure for another. NASA’s vacuum-chamber test used a carbothermal process; the 2023 paper studied electrocatalysis; and the 2025 Joule paper integrated water extraction with photothermal catalysis.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What would be needed before this could make fuel on the Moon?
A useful lunar resource system would need to do more than produce promising chemicals in a lab. It would have to work with available feedstocks and lunar conditions, deliver adequate output with manageable energy and equipment requirements, and operate reliably enough to support a mission. The available account of the Joule study does not establish those operational capabilities or a finished propellant product.
The finding is best understood as a laboratory demonstration of an integrated chemical pathway using lunar-soil simulant. It is a step toward exploring local resource use, not proof that lunar dust can already supply a mission’s water, oxygen or rocket fuel at operational scale.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
