Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more

Check Point Integrity NGX stood out in a 2007 review for combining endpoint security with network access control policy enforcement. Its client could assess a device and enforce policy locally, or work with network equipment to block a non-compliant endpoint. The same review also found gaps in posture checks, management integration and guest access. Those findings describe a historical product—not Check Point’s current NAC offering.

What Check Point Integrity NGX did

Network World’s Mandy Andress reviewed Integrity NGX on July 30, 2007. The product combined endpoint-security technology Check Point acquired with ZoneLabs and capabilities tied to Check Point’s firewall line. The review examined its role in controlling whether endpoints met an organization’s security policy before or while accessing the network. Read the 2007 Network World review.

Two enforcement approaches

Integrity could enforce policy through its client software on the endpoint. Alternatively, in what the review called “cooperative enforcement,” the client worked with an enterprise firewall, remote-access VPN concentrator or 802.1X-capable switch. If the endpoint failed compliance, the network device could block its access. Andress regarded this approach as preferable to relying entirely on controls running on a potentially compromised endpoint.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Standard and flex agents

“Integrity uses two types of agents,” Andress wrote. Standard agents applied policies set by IT, with controls that administrators could hide from users. Flex agents provided a user interface for creating personal security policies alongside corporate policy. The client gathered endpoint details including MAC address, operating system, user, IP address, compliance state and recent reasons for non-compliance.

#1 Best Overall
FortiGate-40F Firewall Appliance - 5 Gigabit Ethernet RJ45 Ports, Ideal for Small Businesses (Appliance Only, No Subscription) (FG-40F)
  • Compact and Efficient Design: The FortiGate 40F is designed for small to mid-sized businesses and enterprise branch offices, featuring a compact, fanless desktop form factor that ensures quiet operation and minimizes space usage.
  • Robust Connectivity Options: Equipped with 5 GE RJ45 ports, including 1 WAN port and 4 internal ports, this model provides essential connectivity and flexibility for various network configurations in a small-scale environment.
  • High-Performance Security: Offers up to 1 Gbps IPS throughput and 600 Mbps threat protection throughput, using Fortinet’s purpose-built security processor technology to deliver industry-leading performance and protection for SSL encrypted traffic.
  • Advanced Threat Protection: Integrated with Fortinet’s AI-powered FortiGuard Labs, the FortiGate 40F offers comprehensive cybersecurity, identifying and mitigating both known and unknown threats to maintain robust security across your network.
  • Simplified Management and Deployment: Features a user-friendly management console that provides comprehensive network automation and visibility, coupled with Zero Touch Integration with Fortinet’s Security Fabric for easy deployment.

How policy assignment and posture checks worked

Integrity relied on enterprise-directory user and group information, which the review says synchronized nightly. That schedule created an operational edge case: if a new user authenticated before the next synchronization, the system applied a configured default policy. An organization evaluating such a setup would need to understand what that fallback policy allowed and how it affected newly provisioned accounts.

The review characterized the product’s out-of-box posture assessment as limited. It supported five major antivirus products, but did not by default assess patch status, desktop firewall status or general endpoint vulnerabilities. That distinction matters: a policy system can enforce a rule only against signals it can collect and evaluate, so antivirus presence alone did not establish broader device health.

Rank #2
FortiGate-60F Network Security Appliance Plus 1 Year FortiGuard Unified Threat Protection (UTP) and FortiCare Premium (FG-60F-BDL-950-12)
  • HARDWARE PLUS SECURITY SERVICES: FortiGate-60F Firewall Appliance bundled with 1 year of FortiCare Premium and FortiGuard Unified Threat Protection.
  • UNIFIED THREAT PROTECTION (UTP): Secures against advanced online threats with comprehensive web filtering and anti-botnet technologies.
  • OPTIMIZED FOR MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESSES: Tailored for businesses needing robust security without the infrastructure of larger enterprises.
  • RELIABLE CUSTOMER SUPPORT: FortiCare Premium ensures high-quality support and service continuity.
  • EFFECTIVE PROTECTION: Employs advanced filtering technologies to safeguard against sophisticated threats.

What the reviewer found in deployment

For the test, Andress installed Integrity on Windows Server 2003, integrated it with a Check Point NG firewall for LAN access and tested integration with Cisco IPSec VPN remote access. The interface was described as relatively clean, but the reviewer judged that the promised integrated management was not fully realized. Andress also said Juniper’s NAC offering worked more completely and offered greater policy granularity; this was the reviewer’s 2007 assessment, not a current product comparison.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Guest access was not seamless

The review noted that Integrity did not provide a captive portal for guest access. The suggested alternatives—restrictive firewall rules or a custom message page—were less seamless than a dedicated guest onboarding flow. This limitation is relevant to the tested 2007 product and should not be generalized to Check Point’s current offerings.

Rank #3
GL.iNet GL-MT5000 Brume 3 Wired VPN Security Gateway NO Wi-Fi
  • 【Up to 1100 Mbps VPN Speed 】 Hardware-accelerated WireGuard and OpenVPN-DCO deliver up to 1100 Mbps VPN throughput, over 3× faster than Brume 2 for smooth remote access and file transfers.
  • 【Three 2.5G Ports & Multi-WAN】Tri-port 2.5GbE design with flexible WAN LAN configuration supports multi-gigabit wired setups, dual-ISP Multi-WAN and failover to keep home and SOHO networks online.
  • 【Stealth VPN Obfuscation】VPN obfuscation disguises VPN traffic as regular HTTPS, helping you evade blocking, bypass restrictive networks and maintain stable, private connections.
  • 【DPI protection】Deep Packet Inspection with visual dashboards blocks adult/gambling/malicious sites, while SQM and QoS prioritize gaming, calls, and video when bandwidth is tight
  • 【OpenWrt & USB 3.0 Expansion】OpenWrt with 1GB DDR4 and 8GB eMMC lets you install plugins and build VPN, ad-blocking or NAS, while USB 3.0 Type‑C connects high-speed storage or 4G/5G dongles

Is Integrity NGX the same as Check Point’s current NAC?

No. Check Point’s current NAC overview describes present-day capabilities and adjacent offerings, including device visibility and profiling, posture checks, restricted access, and centralized policy management. It distinguishes pre-admission checks, performed before network access, from post-admission checks when users or devices move between segmented zones; the approaches can be combined. The page associates current solutions with IoT discovery and segmentation, mobile-device-management integrations, Endpoint Security posture checks and Private Access ZTNA. These are current vendor descriptions, not features established for Integrity NGX. Check Point’s current NAC overview.

Likewise, Check Point’s current Network Security Management page describes a newer management offering for policy, threat prevention, logging, monitoring and gateway lifecycle management. It lists concurrent administration, policy layers, multi-domain management and AI-associated tools such as AI Assist, AI Auditor and AI Insights, with Smart-1 Cloud, Smart-1 appliances and virtual appliances as deployment options. That current product positioning is not a retrospective specification for Integrity NGX. Check Point Network Security Management.

Rank #4
Ubiquiti Cloud Gateway Ultra (UCG-Ultra)
  • Runs UniFi Network for full-stack network management
  • Manages 30+ UniFi Network devices and 300+ clients
  • 1 Gbps routing with IDS/IPS
  • Multi-WAN load balancing
  • 0.96" LCM status display
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

Later policy-management documentation is a separate generation

A Check Point Network Policy Management Software Blade datasheet dated December 3, 2013 documented centralized SmartDashboard management, shared objects, Active Directory/LDAP-backed identity, user-based rules, administrator permission profiles, audit logs and policy revision control. It also listed automated error checks, policy verification, rule hit counts and rule expiry. These are features documented for that 2013 software blade; the datasheet does not establish Integrity NGX capabilities or the current lifecycle or support status of the blade. Network Policy Management Software Blade datasheet (December 3, 2013).

What’s actually slowing this PC down?

Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

What to evaluate when comparing NAC systems today

The 2007 review is useful as a historical example of policy enforcement, not as evidence of current product parity. For a present-day evaluation, focus on how a system behaves across the whole access decision:

  • Admission timing: Does it check compliance before access, after admission as devices move between segments, or both?
  • Posture signals: Which conditions can it assess—such as endpoint protection or patch status—and how fresh is the data?
  • Enforcement point: Does the endpoint, a firewall, a VPN concentrator, a switch or another control point restrict a non-compliant device?
  • Identity and fallback: How does directory information reach the policy system, how often is it refreshed, and what policy applies before a new identity is synchronized?
  • Guest and contractor onboarding: Is there a managed onboarding flow, or must access be handled through restrictive rules or custom pages?
  • Policy administration: Are roles, audit trails, revision history and change verification available in the specific product and edition being evaluated?

These questions separate policy design from enforcement mechanics and expose gaps that can otherwise remain hidden in a feature list.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.