Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Boston Dynamics’ Atlas robot did not perform a full “Karate Kid” crane kick, and the 2014 demonstration did not take place at or win the DARPA Robotics Challenge Finals. In November 2014, Atlas balanced on one leg and moved its arms in a crane-kick-inspired pose programmed by the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC). The Finals followed in June 2015. MIT’s Atlas team reported finishing sixth overall; that result does not establish IHMC’s placement.
What Atlas did in the “Karate Kid” demonstration
In a demonstration reported on November 12, 2014, Atlas raised one leg and moved its arms while balancing. The pose evoked the crane kick from The Karate Kid, but it was not the full jump kick. HotHardware’s contemporary report specifically noted that Atlas could not perform that jump kick at the time. CBS News described the pose, and HotHardware clarified its limits.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Sparking Planet Robot (Colours May Vary) - Tin Collectable | $35.88 | Buy on Amazon |
Boston Dynamics built the robot; IHMC programmed the pose. The distinction matters: Atlas was a robotics platform, and participating teams contributed software and control work. The pose showed a balance capability, not that Atlas was an autonomous martial artist or had mastered a complete kick.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Was the pose part of the DRC Finals?
No. The pose was shown in November 2014, months before the DARPA Robotics Challenge Finals in June 2015. The similar timing in some headlines can blur two separate moments: a demonstration of Atlas balancing and a later disaster-response robotics competition. DARPA dates the Finals to June 2015 and says Atlas was upgraded for that event. DARPA’s Atlas history records the platform’s development and upgrade timeline.
#1 Best Overall
- Schylling Collector Series - Planet Robot with wind up mechanism (Assorted colours)
- As he walks sparks fly inside his face mask On/Off switch
- Warning, this is not a toy - for collectors only, age 14+
- Dimensions approx 22 cm tall
- Product and package are made from recycled materials
What is known about the Finals result
The MIT DARPA Robotics Challenge Team says its Atlas team finished sixth overall. That is MIT’s result, not IHMC’s. The available team account does not establish IHMC’s final placement, so it would be inaccurate to infer it from MIT’s record or from the 2014 pose. MIT’s competition account describes its own two runs and outcome.
What Atlas was built for
DARPA introduced Atlas in 2013 as a platform for the Robotics Challenge. The agency’s original machine was 6 feet 2 inches tall and weighed 330 pounds; it had 28 hydraulically actuated joints, an onboard real-time control computer, and a sensor head with LIDAR and stereo sensors. Those specifications describe the original platform, not necessarily every later Atlas generation. DARPA’s 2013 announcement gives the original specifications.
The challenge addressed disaster-response situations in which hazards could make it too dangerous or difficult for people to respond directly. DARPA’s goal was human-supervised ground robots capable of working in complex, dangerous, degraded, human-engineered environments—using tools and equipment designed for people, including hand tools and vehicles. The competition pushed teams to advance mobility, dexterity, strength, endurance, and supervised autonomy. DARPA’s DRC program description explains that purpose.
What the demonstration shows—and what it does not
A choreographed balance pose is not the same test as completing a disaster-response task. The pose demonstrated balance while Atlas moved its arms; the DRC focused on whether human-supervised robots could carry out useful work in hazardous, human-built environments. The sources do not provide a formal DRC-style evaluation of the crane-kick pose, so it should not be treated as proof of broader disaster-response performance.
Nor was the early Atlas simply acting on its own. DARPA described the original platform as connected by a tether to off-board power and a computer used by a human operator, with software and operator actions guiding its sensors and actuators. The broader challenge sought supervised operation, including in conditions where communications could be degraded. DARPA’s account of Atlas and its DRC overview distinguish the robot hardware from the systems and human oversight needed to use it.
Why use a humanoid robot?
IHMC’s rationale, reproduced by HotHardware in its 2014 report, was that robots working in spaces built for people may benefit from a human-like form: “Because the robots will be working in environments built for humans, a human-like robot is best-suited to the challenges involved.” That is the institute’s stated design rationale, not proof that a humanoid will outperform other robot designs in every task.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
