iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
BladeRoom announced its U.S. entry in 2013 through a partnership with Modular Power Solutions (MPS), a Rosendin Holdings unit, with plans for manufacturing in Michigan and a Chicago technology center. Those plans are historical; BladeRoom now identifies Kais-AIR, a Kaiser Enterprise division, as its exclusive licensee for designing, fabricating, and installing BladeRoom data centers in North America.
What BladeRoom announced in 2013
In an October 7, 2013 report, Data Center Knowledge described a new U.S. venture called BladeRoom USA, formed by U.K.-based BladeRoom and MPS. The announcement called for prefabricated components to be manufactured at a Michigan factory and for a Chicago technology center to open in January. The report records the plan as announced; it does not establish that each facility opened as described or that the original partnership continues.
The report framed the U.S. launch as an effort to bring BladeRoom’s modular data-center method to a market where customer and regional requirements vary. Barnaby Smith, then Head of Communications for BladeRoom USA, explained: “We break the overall data center down into a series of pre-engineered building blocks. You can combine these to create a facility of any size and density.” He also cautioned, “The US is a different animal from the rest of the world.” Both statements are from the 2013 report, not current product specifications.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →What “building blocks” meant
The modular concept was to combine pre-engineered facility components into a data center tailored to a customer’s needs. BladeRoom said its design was IT-vendor-neutral and could support standard racks or freestanding equipment. The 2013 report described data-hall capacities from 70 kW to 1.5 MW, with typical cabinet loads of 1–20 kW and spot delivery up to 50 kW. These are historical figures reported in 2013, not a specification range for all current BladeRoom facilities.
#1 Best Overall
- Save valuable floor space: 6U wall mount server cabinet Dimensions: 13.78" H x21.65" W x17.72" D.Maximum mounting depth is 14.2"
- Keep critical network equipment secure: glass door and side panels are lockable to prevent unauthorized access. Front door can be installed on either side of the front of the cabinet to satisfy your door swing orientation preference
- Easy equipment configuration: Fully adjustable mounting rails and numbered U positions, with square holes for easy equipment mounting with top and bottom punch-out panels for easy cable access
- Durability: Made of high quality cold rolled steel holds up to 110lb (50kg) (Easy Assembly Required)
- PCI & HIPPA and EIA/ECA-310-E compliant
For cooling, the 2013 description combined filtered outside air and evaporative cooling with backup direct-expansion (DX) refrigerant cooling. Controls were described as adjusting airflow to IT demand. The design was presented as not requiring a raised floor or ductwork. BladeRoom said this approach could reduce energy and water use; the report does not provide independent measurements that verify those savings.
What the 2013 performance claims do—and do not—show
The 2013 article reported that BladeRoom had built more than 30 data centers in Europe, Asia, and Africa, and said projects could be delivered in as little as 20 weeks. It cited Merlin and a Capgemini UK facility as examples. It also reported a BladeRoom-claimed PUE range of 1.09–1.17 for major U.S. markets. These figures are claims and descriptions recorded in a 2013 article, not independently validated benchmarks or current guarantees. The same report said MPS had delivered more than 60 MW of modular power rooms.
The article traced BladeRoom’s origins to modular commercial kitchens and hospital operating rooms, and said the company rebranded as BladeRoom in 2008 before focusing on data centers. That background helps explain the prefabrication approach, but it does not by itself establish present-day performance or delivery outcomes.
Recommended Free Tools
Rank #2
- Save valuable floor space: 12U wall mount server cabinet Dimensions: 24.25" H x21.65" W x17.72" D. MAXIMUM MOUNTING DEPTH is 14.2".
- Keep critical network equipment secure: glass door and side panels are lockable to prevent unauthorized access; Front door can be installed on either side of the front of the cabinet to satisfy your door swing orientation preference
- Easy equipment configuration: Fully adjustable mounting rails and numbered U positions, with square holes for easy equipment mounting with top and bottom punchout panels for easy cable access
- Durability: Made of high quality cold rolled steel holds up to 110lb (50kg) (Easy Assembly Required)
- PCI & HIPPA and EIA/ECA-310-E compliant
Who represents BladeRoom in North America now?
BladeRoom’s North American Operations page, accessed September 30, 2026, names Kais-AIR, a Kaiser Enterprise division, as the exclusive licensee for designing, fabricating, and installing BladeRoom data centers in North America. This is the current arrangement BladeRoom describes on that page; it differs from the MPS/Rosendin partnership announced in 2013.
On the same page, BladeRoom reports 1,000,000 square feet of U.S. manufacturing space and 20 U.S. BladeRooms delivered, with sites ranging from 375 kW to 19 MW. It also reports 189 data halls globally and more than 214 MW of capacity. These are company-published figures accessed September 30, 2026, rather than independently audited totals.
What BladeRoom’s All-In-One offers
BladeRoom’s All-In-One Modular Data Centre page, accessed September 30, 2026, describes a prefabricated facility designed for up to 100 kW and 13 racks. The page states a PUE of 1.11, full operation within 20 weeks of final design approval, and installation and connections within 72 hours. It describes an example deployment for an unnamed U.S. automotive manufacturer and attributes the 1.11 PUE to that facility. These are vendor-published product and example claims, not independently validated results or a universal performance guarantee.
Rank #3
- Sturdy:4u server rack is construct from cold rolled steel, with a weight capacity of 110lbs(50kg); Electrostatic powder coat prevents rust and corrosion,quality finish
- Direct use:Open and use, not having to assemble it.Network rack can be placed flat or mounted on the wall,also can be installed vertically under the table
- Design Features:maximum mounting depth of 14 in,cables can be fixed on the side panel;Open frame server rack achieves effortless inspection, replacement and assemble
- Installation:wall mount network rack is easy to install,with instructions or videos for reference;Equipped with multiple accessories, suitable for different needs
- Application:EIA/ECA-310-E Compliant;wall mounted 4u rack fits all 19" racks and cabinets to hold various IT, network, and AV equipment;wall mount rack available in 4U, 6U, and 8U to choose
How to compare modular, containerized, and site-built data centers
“Modular” can describe a facility assembled from prefabricated elements; “containerized” often refers to IT or facility systems packaged in container-like enclosures; conventional construction is built primarily on site. Those labels alone do not determine cost, resilience, or suitability. BladeRoom’s positioning of its All-In-One against containerized facilities and its 2013 framing of conventional permanent data centers as competition are company perspectives, not independent comparative testing.
| Decision factor | Questions to ask |
|---|---|
| Customization and expansion | Can the design fit the site’s footprint, local codes, growth plan, and preferred equipment? How much can be changed after design approval? |
| IT capacity and density | What supported total load and rack or cabinet density are documented for the proposed configuration? Do not substitute historical product figures for a current design specification. |
| Cooling and climate fit | Which cooling modes are included, under what outdoor conditions, and with what water and energy requirements? Request site-specific design assumptions. |
| Redundancy and resilience | What redundancy is provided for power, cooling, controls, and maintenance? Ask for the topology, failure scenarios, and service assumptions rather than relying on a general “resilient” label. |
| Utility and site requirements | What electrical service, water availability, foundations, access, permits, and local construction work are required? |
| Schedule and on-site work | Which activities are included in the stated timeline, and when does the clock start? Separate factory fabrication, delivery, installation, utility connection, commissioning, and acceptance. |
| Efficiency and lifecycle cost | Request independently verifiable operating data and a comparable total-cost model covering capital, energy, water, maintenance, replacement, and expansion over the same operating period. |
For a procurement comparison, require each bidder to price the same capacity, availability target, climate assumptions, redundancy level, commissioning scope, and lifecycle period. A short installation window or a favorable PUE claim is useful only when its boundary conditions and measurement method are clear.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
