Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteiTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Not on their own in this case. The Allahabad High Court reportedly dismissed a husband’s challenge to a maintenance order after he relied on printouts of alleged Instagram chats. Reports say the court found the messages insufficient to establish that his wife was continuously living in adultery without corroborating evidence of physical intimacy or cohabitation.
What the Allahabad High Court reportedly decided
According to Hindustan Times, a single-judge bench of Justice Jai Krishna Upadhyay dismissed a husband’s revision petition challenging a Family Court maintenance order from Sambhal at Chandausi. The Family Court order was dated October 1, 2025; the High Court judgment was dated September 29, 2026.
The husband argued that his wife should be denied maintenance because she was living in adultery. He relied on printouts of alleged Instagram conversations between her and an advocate. The reports say the High Court concluded that the messages did not, without corroboration, establish the conduct required for that maintenance disqualification.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsWhy the reported ruling treated the chats as insufficient
The decision, as described in India Today, turned on two distinct questions: whether the material proved the alleged conduct, and whether the electronic records met the applicable evidentiary requirement.
#1 Best Overall
| Issue | What the reports say |
|---|---|
| What the chats showed | Printouts of alleged social-media conversations. The court reportedly said messages without corroborative evidence of physical intimacy or cohabitation were insufficient to establish continuous adultery. |
| What corroboration was missing | Evidence of physical intimacy or cohabitation, according to India Today’s account of the court’s reasoning. |
| Electronic-record certification | Hindustan Times and India Today report that the court noted the electronic material lacked certification under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act. |
These are separate points: a record may raise a question about what happened, while certification concerns whether the electronic material satisfies the stated evidentiary requirement. The reports do not support a broad rule that social-media messages can never be evidence of adultery.
What “living in adultery” means in this maintenance dispute
The coverage describes the relevant standard as a continuing and habitual course of conduct, rather than a single incident or an inference drawn from conversation alone. India Today quotes the court as saying: “It does not encompass a single, fleeting lapse, nor can it be inferred from mere conversational interactions, professional associations or unsubstantiated suspicions. For a husband to successfully non-suit a wife’s claim for maintenance at the threshold, he must present clear and cogent evidence.”
In other words, the reported reasoning distinguishes proof of ongoing conduct from proof that two people communicated or had a professional association. The court’s reported conclusion was about whether the husband’s evidence met the standard for this maintenance challenge.
Which maintenance laws did the reports identify?
India Today frames the dispute under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with the corresponding current provision identified as Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. That statutory context describes this reported maintenance dispute; it does not establish how a court would assess different evidence or a different proceeding.
Rank #3
What the ruling does—and does not—establish
- It does establish, as reported: the High Court dismissed this husband’s challenge, and the alleged Instagram chat printouts did not suffice without corroboration and the required electronic-record certification.
- It does not establish: that chats are categorically inadmissible or irrelevant in every adultery, matrimonial, maintenance, or criminal case.
- It does not resolve: how a different record, properly certified electronic evidence, or additional corroboration would be treated.
The accounts available are news reports rather than the underlying judgment text. The case number, full cause title, maintenance amount, and any later appeal or clarification are not established in those reports. The quotations above are attributed to the Allahabad High Court as reproduced by India Today.
Quick Recap
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
