iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Archaeologists excavating Chan Chan in northern Peru descended a staircase about eight feet (2.5 meters) into a central burial chamber at the Utzh An complex. The chamber held one person, but the wider funerary platform contained remains of 38 people in total. Reports describe the burials as about 600 years old; that does not establish that every burial context remained untouched or prove who the central individual was.
What archaeologists found at the bottom of the staircase
The Ministry of Culture excavation at Utzh An, a walled complex formerly called the Gran Chimú Palace, revealed a funerary platform with a central chamber and two side chambers. Andina reports that the staircase leading down to the central chamber was about 1.2 meters wide and 5 meters deep, descending approximately 2.5 meters. Andina’s account of the discovery describes shell and metal objects, beads, vessels, ear ornaments, textiles or surviving threads, and long objects that archaeologist Jorge Meneses tentatively interpreted as staffs.
The number 38 refers to the whole platform, not the central room: one individual was in the central chamber, while reports describe 20 people in a side chamber and 18 more elsewhere in the platform. A follow-up report from Andina provides the additional burial count.
What “no one had entered in 600 years” does—and does not—mean
Coverage has described the main chamber as sealed for roughly 600 years. That phrase should not be taken to mean archaeologists proved every burial remained in its original arrangement. Meneses said the principal individual’s remains were in a secondary funerary context: they had not remained unaltered since deposition. He also cautioned that this alone did not show that looters had disturbed them. Andina quoted Meneses on the context and its limits.
The reported age is approximate and places the burials in the Late Chimú period; the cited coverage does not provide a precise radiocarbon date for this platform. It is therefore more accurate to call the find about 600 years old than to give it an exact year.
Who was buried in the central chamber?
The central individual’s identity and precise rank have not been established. Meneses suggested the person may have been an important member of Chimú society rather than a ruler, while allowing that the burial could belong to a ruler from a nearby valley. These are interpretations, not a confirmed identification. Andina’s report attributes that assessment to the lead archaeologist.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why the find matters for understanding the Chimú
Chan Chan was the capital of the Chimú Kingdom. UNESCO says the city reached its apogee in the 15th century before the Incas conquered it; its monumental remains include palaces and funerary platforms. UNESCO’s Chan Chan World Heritage listing provides the site context.
Intact associations between human remains and objects can help researchers examine funerary practices and social distinctions. That evidence is especially useful because previous examples of elite Chimú burials were often looted, leaving less context for study, as discussed in Smithsonian coverage of Chimú burials and National Geographic’s account of the discovery. The platform’s objects and burial arrangement offer evidence, but they do not by themselves settle the central figure’s identity or status.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
