iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The reported cut of STV Group’s average analyst price target by 18.90% to 120.36p cannot be independently verified from the accessible company materials: they do not identify the target’s provider, measurement date, analysts covered or previous consensus figure. STV’s latest results offer context for the company’s performance, but they do not establish that this target changed or explain why.
Is the 120.36p average price target verified?
No. The exact 120.36p figure, the claimed 18.90% reduction, the earlier average and the date of the change are not substantiated by the available sources. The figure should therefore be treated as an unverified market-data claim, not as a confirmed consensus target.
STV’s investor site and research page provide routes to analyst research, but the accessible material does not show the figures or methodology needed to validate the claim. Without a named data provider and dated coverage set, it is also unclear whether “average” means a mean or another consensus measure.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
To assess a target change reliably, readers need its as-of date, the analysts included, the target range and central measure, and the prior value from the same provider. The available evidence does not support calculating or presenting a previous target from the claimed percentage.
#1 Best Overall
What STV’s latest results show
STV Group’s interim results, published 8 September 2026, cover the six months ended 30 June 2026. They describe a mixed period: group revenue fell, advertising revenue rose, and adjusted operating profit declined. The results provide company context, not proof of a particular analyst action.
| Measure | H1 2026 result | Comparison or context |
|---|---|---|
| Group revenue | £66.1m | Down 27% from £90.0m in H1 2025 |
| Total advertising revenue | £48.1m | Up 5% from £45.6m; STV attributed the increase to the positive impact of the FIFA World Cup |
| Adjusted operating profit | £5.9m | Down from £6.7m; Audience contributed £11.1m adjusted operating profit, while Studios recorded a £3.2m adjusted operating loss |
| Statutory operating result | £20.5m loss | Included a £25.4m non-cash impairment of Studios assets |
| Net debt | £42.9m at 30 June 2026 | £45.3m at 31 December 2025; reported leverage was 2.4x against a 3.75x covenant maximum |
These figures are from STV’s interim results announcement of 8 September 2026.
Rank #2
- Comes with secure packaging
- Easy to read text
- It can be a gift option
Was STV profitable?
It depends on the measure. For H1 2026, STV reported adjusted operating profit of £5.9m, but a statutory operating loss of £20.5m after the non-cash Studios impairment. Those results should not be reduced to an unqualified claim that the company was simply profitable or unprofitable.
For comparison, STV’s full-year results for the year ended 31 December 2025 reported revenue of £176.9m, adjusted operating profit of £11.6m, net debt of £45.3m and adjusted basic EPS of 13.1p. Total advertising revenue was £89.3m, down 10%, while STV Player viewing reached 75 million hours, up 9%. These are historical full-year figures, not a current run rate. The company proposed no final dividend for 2025. See the full-year results published 17 March 2026.
What management said about the outlook
In its interim announcement, STV said it remained on track to deliver £8m of annualised run-rate cost savings by the end of FY26 and expected Studios to break even in FY26. It said a Studios profit in FY27 depended on positive decisions on a small number of material commissions. These are management expectations, not guarantees.
Chief Executive Rufus Radcliffe said the first-half performance was “in line with our expectations and previous guidance.” He attributed the increase in advertising revenue and viewing to the FIFA World Cup and disciplined cost management, while saying reduced Studios profitability reflected the timing of scripted-programming delivery and continued weakness in the commissioning market. That is management’s explanation of the period; it does not establish why an analyst target might have changed.
STV proposed no interim dividend and said it would continue reviewing the position. The interim announcement is the source for these statements and figures: STV Group interim results, 8 September 2026.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallWhy the alleged target cut cannot be explained from these results
A company’s financial results can help investors evaluate its prospects, but they do not reveal which analyst changed a target, when that change occurred, or what assumptions drove it. No analyst estimates, valuation methods or broker commentary supporting the reported cut are established in the available material. It would therefore be speculative to say that the interim results caused the claimed reduction.
Best Value
Anyone checking the claim should seek a dated report or data-provider page that names the coverage set and states both the old and new consensus values. A useful comparison would also show the target range and central measure, analysts’ earnings assumptions, treatment of debt and pension obligations, and valuation method.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
