Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The moto g86 power 5G has no single definitive benchmark score: published results differ by benchmark version, test conditions, and source. 91mobiles reports an AnTuTu score of 677,110, while NanoReview lists 867,154 for AnTuTu 11—a different version, so the figures are not direct contradictions. Geekbench, 3DMark, and PCMark results likewise need to be read with their test names and sources attached.
Moto G86 Power benchmark scores at a glance
| Benchmark | Published result | Source and qualification |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 677,110 | 91mobiles reports this score and its CPU, GPU, memory, and UX breakdown. Its page does not provide enough test-condition detail to reconcile it with other sources. |
| AnTuTu 11 | 867,154 | NanoReview displays this version-specific score. Do not compare it as though it were the same test version as 91mobiles’ AnTuTu result. |
| Geekbench | 1,084 single-core; 3,015 multi-core | 91mobiles reports these results. |
| Geekbench 6.7.1 | 1,081 single-core; 3,033 multi-core | A single Geekbench Browser submission, uploaded September 6, 2026, reports these scores on Android 15. It is one user-submitted run. |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 959 | 91mobiles reports this result. |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 992 median | UL Benchmarks lists a median of user-submitted results; its page updates daily. |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 406 | 91mobiles reports this result. |
| PCMark battery test | 11 h 6 m | 91mobiles reports this battery result. |
| PCMark Work 3.0 | 16,174 median | UL Benchmarks lists a median of user-submitted results. |
| PCMark battery test | 14 h 37 m | UL Benchmarks reports a submitted-result battery figure; battery-test results vary with brightness and other conditions. |
What the AnTuTu results mean
91mobiles reports an overall AnTuTu score of 677,110, broken down as 205,631 for CPU, 168,878 for GPU, 129,254 for memory, and 173,347 for UX. These component scores show how that source divides its reported result, but the page does not document enough test conditions to treat the figures as a controlled baseline for every phone or region.
NanoReview separately displays 867,154 for AnTuTu 11. Benchmark versions can use different tests and scoring, so this number should not be averaged with or substituted for the 91mobiles figure. For a useful comparison, confirm that both phones were tested using the same AnTuTu version and comparable configurations.
Geekbench: single-core and multi-core results
Geekbench separates single-core performance from multi-core performance. The single-core score represents work handled by one CPU core; the multi-core score reflects a workload spread across cores. In the reported results, 91mobiles lists 1,084 and 3,015, respectively. A Geekbench Browser run on Android 15 using Geekbench 6.7.1 lists 1,081 and 3,033. NanoReview displays Geekbench 6 figures of 1,049 single-core and 2,939 multi-core.
#1 Best Overall
- For USA Buyers: This Smartphone is not compatible/will not work with any CDMA Networks including: VERIZON, SPRINT, US CELLULAR. Please check with your network provider for 3G, 4G/LTE, 5G compatibility check before you purchase. OUTSIDE THE USA WORKS ANY CARRIER WORLDWIDE
- 256GB Storage, 8GB RAM, microSDXC (dedicated slot), SIM Configuration: 1 physical Nano-SIM + 1 eSIM. This phone does NOT support two physical SIM cards. eSIM activation depends on carrier compatibility and availability.
- 6.67 inches, P-OLED, 1B colors, 1220 x 2712 pixels
- Android 15, Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm), Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
- Rear: 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 8 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF, Front: 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm
These are source-specific observations, not a guaranteed score range for every moto g86 power 5G. Geekbench labels version 6 as a legacy version and says to compare it only with other Geekbench 6 results; the dated 6.7.1 submission is one user run, not a device-wide average. Match the Geekbench version before comparing phones, and keep single-core and multi-core values distinct.
3DMark results are different graphics tests
91mobiles lists 959 in Wild Life Extreme and 406 in Steel Nomad. UL Benchmarks’ submitted-result medians include 3,616 for Wild Life, 3,579 for Wild Life Unlimited, 992 for Wild Life Extreme, 5,090 for Sling Shot Extreme, and 6,588 for Sling Shot. The scores are not interchangeable: each test has its own workload, so a larger number in one test does not by itself mean better performance than a smaller number in another.
Rank #2
- 6.8" HD+ 1604x720, 263ppi, Gorilla Glass 5 LCD, 120Hz refresh rate, 20:9 Aspect Ratio, 5000mAh Battery, Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades
- 128GB, 8GB RAM, microSDXC (dedicated slot), Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), Mali-G57 MC2 GPU
- Rear Camera: 50MP, f/1.8 (wide) + 8MP, f/2.2 (Ultrawide), Front Camera: 16MP, f/2.4 (wide), Fingerprint side-mounted, 15W Wireless Charging Capable.
- 5G: NR band n2/5/7/12/14/25/26/29/30/41/48/66/70/71/77/78, Global 4G LTE bands - Nano-SIM + eSIM
- Carrier Unlocked US model – Global Connectivity – Plug & Play with an ACTIVE SIM on AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and most U.S. carriers. Carrier unlocked device may retain original carrier logo on start up, while being fully unlocked. New Activation compatible with all Major Carriers in the US and Globally. (Not Compatibe with Certain MVNOs like Xfinty and Spectrum).
The two Wild Life Extreme figures are closer in test identity, but they still come from different sources and sample methods. UL’s 992 is a median across user submissions, while 91mobiles publishes its own reported result; the available details do not establish matching device conditions. Use the same 3DMark test and comparable settings when evaluating a graphics comparison.
PCMark productivity and battery results
PCMark Work 3.0 is a productivity score; PCMark’s battery test reports elapsed time. UL lists a Work 3.0 median of 16,174 and a battery result of 14 hours 37 minutes. 91mobiles reports a battery result of 11 hours 6 minutes. These battery figures are not guaranteed real-world runtimes: UL notes that brightness and other test conditions affect the result. The two sources’ battery values should not be collapsed into a single expected duration.
Rank #3
- Unlocked: Compatible with all major U.S. carriers, including Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and other major carriers.
- Super-bright 6.8" display + Bass Boost. Enjoy boundless entertainment on a massive, 120Hz display and stereo speakers with 1.7x more powerful bass***.
- Long-lasting battery + TurboPower charging. Go over a day on a single charge with a 5000mAh battery and blazing-fast charging—even charge wirelessly.*
- 50MP** camera system with OIS. Capture sharper low-light photos and smoother videos with an unshakable camera system featuring Optical Image Stabilization.
- Stylish yet durable design. Enjoy the premium look and feel of vegan leather with Corning Gorilla Glass 5 and underwater protection.
Why published scores differ
The moto g86 power 5G uses MediaTek’s Dimensity 7300 according to Motorola’s US specification page. That page lists Android 15, 8 GB physical RAM, up to 16 GB with RAM Boost, 512 GB storage, a 6,720 mAh battery, and 30 W TurboPower charging; Motorola cautions that specifications may vary by market. These US-listed specifications should not be assumed to describe every regional version or benchmark sample.
UL says its figures are medians of user-submitted results, that non-ideal conditions can lower scores, and that its page updates daily. Its results provide a broad sample rather than a controlled single-device review. The Geekbench Browser result identifies its version and Android 15, but remains one submission. 91mobiles groups several tests on one page, but does not provide enough test-condition information to reconcile its results precisely with UL’s medians.
Quick Recap
- Benchmark version: AnTuTu 11 and other AnTuTu versions are not the same test label; Geekbench comparisons should use matching versions.
- Test identity: Separate 3DMark workloads and PCMark productivity versus battery tests measure different things.
- Sample and conditions: A single submission, a publisher’s reported result, and a user-submission median are different kinds of evidence.
- Configuration and region: OS, memory setup, and regional model specifications can affect whether two results are comparable.
How to compare the phone with another model
- Match the benchmark and version. Compare AnTuTu with the same AnTuTu version, Geekbench 6 with Geekbench 6, or the exact same 3DMark test.
- Keep score types separate. Compare Geekbench single-core to single-core and multi-core to multi-core; do not treat PCMark Work 3.0 as a battery-duration score.
- Check the sample details. Note whether the result is one run, a publisher-reported figure, or a median of user submissions, and compare operating system and memory configuration where stated.
- Use benchmarks as one input. Synthetic scores measure selected workloads; they do not alone establish sustained gaming frame rates, thermal behavior, battery life in your use, or overall value.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
