iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
A new commodity bull market is plausible, but the case is not that every raw material is already rising together. Investor Adam Rozencwajg argued in a Funds Europe interview published on July 24, 2026, that oil, uranium and platinum-group metals (PGMs) may be in an early phase of a cycle. He was more cautious on gold and copper. That is a sector-specific investment thesis—not proof of a synchronized bull market or a reliable forecast.
What would make this an early-cycle bull market?
Commodity prices tend to strengthen when demand grows faster than producers can bring new supply to market. The gap can widen when projects take years to develop, existing fields or mines decline, investment has been limited, or disruption removes supply. If prices rise enough, they can eventually attract new production; that response may take time.
This framework helps explain the appeal of the early-cycle argument, but it also shows why “commodities” should not be treated as a single trade. Oil, uranium, PGMs, copper and gold have different buyers, supply chains, inventories and sensitivities to economic growth. Evidence of tightness in one market does not establish a bull market in the others.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteWhere the bullish case is concentrated
| Commodity | Rozencwajg’s argument | What could challenge it |
|---|---|---|
| Oil | He expects slower growth in non-OPEC supply; if demand continues, that could improve OPEC’s market share and pricing power. | Demand weakness, faster-than-expected non-OPEC production or a change in OPEC supply policy could undermine the setup. |
| Uranium | Reactor construction and rising electricity needs, including from data centers, could increase fuel demand faster than new supply arrives. | Delayed reactor projects, lower-than-expected electricity or fuel demand, new production, or changes to utility purchasing could ease the balance. |
| PGMs | Mine-supply constraints, automotive catalyst demand and slower-than-expected electric-vehicle adoption could support platinum-group metals. | Weaker vehicle production, faster EV adoption, substitution or additional mine supply could reduce demand or tighten neither metal’s balance. |
| Copper | Rozencwajg sees copper as more exposed to short- and medium-term economic conditions than the other favored sectors. | Economic weakness and rising visible inventories can weigh on prices even when longer-term electrification demand remains a consideration. |
| Gold | He described gold as less compelling in the environment discussed in the interview. | Gold has distinct drivers from industrial commodities, so the other sectors’ supply arguments do not by themselves explain its outlook. |
These are attributed views, not independently verified forecasts. The interview also interpreted the Gulf conflict as exposing conditions that were already developing in oil, rather than creating the entire oil thesis.
#1 Best Overall
- Fresh Woody Skin Scent
What the reported figures do—and do not—show
Historical prices are not a valuation test
Funds Europe reported that, among 42 commodities tracked in its analysis, seven were at nominal record highs as of February 2026 and the others were 46% below their historical peaks. On an inflation-adjusted basis, the article said only gold had reached a real all-time high, while the other commodities were roughly 73% below their real peaks. These comparisons were relayed by the publication; its underlying dataset and method were not independently checked here. A price below an old peak does not by itself mean an asset is cheap or that it will rise: costs, demand, supply and the value of money change over time.
Uranium contracting is a clue, not a verified shortage forecast
The Funds Europe article relayed figures from Rozencwajg of roughly 175 million pounds of annual reactor uranium requirements versus utility purchases of approximately 115 million pounds in both 2024 and 2025. It also reported his claim that reactor fuel requirements had exceeded utility long-term contracting by more than 50 million pounds a year for 13 years. The figures were not independently validated against primary uranium-market data here. Requirements, purchases and long-term contract coverage are different measures; the comparison alone does not establish when or at what price utilities will buy more.
PGM demand depends on more than EV adoption
The same article attributed to Rozencwajg the estimate that automotive catalysts account for nearly 65% of total PGM consumption. His argument is that continued catalyst demand, combined with mine-supply constraints and lower-than-expected EV penetration, could support the metals. The estimate and outlook were not independently verified here. Vehicle production, the mix of vehicle types, catalyst use and substitution can all affect the demand picture.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Copper inventories complicate the longer-term story
A Q2 2026 Goehring & Rozencwajg commentary reproduced by Seeking Alpha reported that combined Shanghai, London Metal Exchange and COMEX copper inventories had increased almost sevenfold from 2024, reaching a peak of 1.3 million tonnes, or about 18 days of consumption. This is the investment manager’s reported analysis, not independently checked exchange data. The commentary also cautioned that comparing absolute inventory tonnage across decades requires accounting for changes in consumption. The figure is a reason to examine near-term conditions, not a complete verdict on copper’s long-term supply outlook.
Why price history and producer shares can tell different stories
A commodity’s market price and a producer’s share price are different exposures. A producer’s costs, debt, operating performance, project decisions and valuation can all affect its shares; a move in the underlying commodity does not translate one-for-one into an equity return. Conversely, commodity prices influence whether a producer can profitably invest in future supply. A January 22, 2021 Sprott Money interview discussed the relationship between production economics and investment in supply, but that commentary should not be treated as a universal price floor or guarantee.
For readers assessing an investment, it matters whether the question is about a raw material, a futures-linked product, a fund or a company that produces it. The risks and performance drivers are not interchangeable.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to test whether the thesis is developing
Rather than relying on a broad label such as “commodity bull market,” follow the evidence for each market separately:
- Supply response: Is production growing, and how soon can announced projects or capacity increases deliver material?
- Demand durability: Is consumption rising for structural reasons, or is it mainly benefiting from a temporary economic upswing?
- Available supply: Are inventories, utility contracting or other relevant measures tightening or loosening?
- Disruptions and policy: Could geopolitical events, regulation or changes in government policy alter supply or demand?
- Price and investment exposure: Are you tracking the commodity itself or a producer whose returns also depend on company-specific factors?
A case for an early cycle would become less persuasive if supply expands faster than demand, inventories build, or expected demand fails to appear. It would be strengthened—not proven—by persistent demand alongside constrained supply and evidence that buyers are competing for available material. No comparable set of primary market balances is established by the figures cited above, so they do not support a quantitative ranking of these sectors.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
