Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteiTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Humans kiss for several possible reasons, but no single evolutionary origin has been demonstrated. The strongest current interpretation is cautious: kissing may perform functions such as mate assessment or social bonding, while the idea that it descended from ape grooming remains a historical hypothesis awaiting a close behavioral match in great apes.
That distinction matters. A behavior can be useful today without having originated for that purpose, and historical records can show how people practiced kissing without revealing when the behavior first evolved. Here is what each major explanation proposes, what evidence would support it, and where the evidence still stops.
The short answer: several hypotheses, no confirmed origin
Evolutionary explanations for kissing fall into two different categories. Functional hypotheses ask what kissing might do for people now—for example, help assess a potential mate or reinforce a relationship. Origin hypotheses ask what ancestral behavior could have produced human kissing in the first place.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Mate assessment and social affiliation are plausible functions discussed in current comparative work, but neither has been shown to explain the first human kiss. A grooming-related origin is more specifically about ancestry: it proposes that a lip-based behavior used by an ape ancestor could have been transformed into kissing. That proposal requires evidence from great apes, not just observations of humans who kiss.
#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
The available comparative evidence is limited. It does not justify saying that kissing reliably tests a partner’s health, proves genetic compatibility, evolved as a pathogen detector, or definitely came from grooming. Those are stronger claims than the evidence supports.
Origin and function are different evolutionary questions
What a functional explanation would show
If kissing helps people form bonds or evaluate partners, researchers would need direct evidence connecting the behavior with those outcomes. Studies could examine whether kissing changes relationship closeness, reduces interpersonal tension, or provides cues that people use consistently when choosing partners. Such findings would support a present-day function, but they would not by themselves prove that the function caused kissing to evolve.
What an origin explanation would show
An origin theory must connect human kissing to an ancestral behavior through comparative evidence. Researchers would look for a behavior in a closely related species that resembles human kissing in its physical form, social setting and effect. Similar-looking movements that serve a different purpose would be weak evidence. Likewise, a human benefit cannot establish what an ancestral population was doing before written records existed.
Recommended Free Tools
Why the distinction prevents overstatement
Natural selection can preserve, modify or repurpose behaviors. A behavior that began in one context could later acquire additional social or sexual uses. Therefore, evidence that kissing strengthens bonds is not proof that bonding was its original cause; evidence that people notice odors during close contact is not proof that mate assessment created the behavior.
How the main theories compare
| Account | Question it addresses | Evidence it would need | Evidence type | What is established |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mate assessment | Could kissing provide information about a potential partner? | Direct, repeatable links between kissing and judgments or choices involving a partner | Human behavioral and sensory evidence | A proposed function; health, immune, genetic and oral-microbiome signals are hypotheses, not reliable tests |
| Social affiliation and bonding | Could kissing maintain relationships or reduce tension? | Direct links between kissing and bonding, reconciliation or emotional regulation | Human social evidence, with comparative context | A plausible affiliative function whose evolutionary history remains insufficiently explored |
| Grooming-related origin | Could an ape grooming act have preceded human kissing? | A great-ape behavior matching kissing in form, context and function | Comparative-primate observation | A hypothesis; the required match has not been established |
| Pathogen or health screening | Did kissing evolve to detect infection or avoid disease? | Evidence that kissing itself detects pathogens or shaped mate choice through that route | Human disease and mate-preference research | Not demonstrated; general disease-avoidance research is adjacent, not proof about kissing’s origin |
| Historical-record approach | How was kissing understood and practiced in documented societies? | Texts or artifacts describing the behavior and its consequences | Historical evidence | Useful for cultural history and transmission risks, not for dating evolutionary origins |
Mate assessment: could a kiss reveal something about a potential partner?
One proposal is that close contact gives people access to olfactory or other sensory cues that influence judgments about a potential mate. The 2025 comparative article describing this account lists possible signals involving health, genetic compatibility, immune-system differences and characteristics of the oral microbiome.
Rank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
These possibilities are best treated as proposed channels of information, not as a biological diagnostic system. A kiss brings faces and mouths into unusually close proximity, so smell and taste could be available along with visual and tactile information. But the existence of a cue does not show that people perceive it accurately, that it affects mate choice, or that natural selection created kissing for that purpose.
What would count as stronger support?
Support would require experiments or observations showing a consistent relationship between kissing and partner evaluation. For example, researchers would need to establish that people receive a specific cue during kissing, that they can use it in judgments, and that those judgments predict a meaningful relationship or reproductive outcome. Results would also need to separate kissing from other forms of close contact, conversation, appearance and prior knowledge.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Why “health test” is the wrong shorthand
It is tempting to summarize the theory by saying a kiss checks whether someone is healthy or genetically suitable. That wording implies a reliable test, which has not been demonstrated. The literature instead identifies possible signals and asks whether they could matter. A person may notice an odor or taste without knowing its cause, and a cue associated with illness in one setting may not be specific enough to identify a pathogen or overall compatibility.
Social affiliation: kissing as relationship maintenance
A second account treats kissing as an affiliative behavior. On this view, kissing can help people navigate relationships, reduce tension after conflict, or strengthen an existing bond. The behavior’s value would come from the interaction itself: coordinated touch, attention and emotional signaling could reinforce a connection between individuals.
This explanation fits the idea that kissing is not limited to mate choice. People may use intimate contact in different relationship contexts, and a behavior can be retained because it helps manage social ties even if it also appears in courtship. However, the 2025 comparative article emphasizes that the evolutionary history of this function and its potential correlates have not been explored sufficiently.
Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
What a bonding account predicts
- Kissing should be associated with measurable changes in relationship closeness, trust, reconciliation or tension.
- Its effects should depend on the relationship and context, rather than appearing only during mate selection.
- Comparable affiliative behaviors in other primates could help explain how such a function evolved, but only if their form and social use are genuinely comparable.
These predictions concern what kissing may do now. Even if future studies confirm a bonding effect, that result would not identify the first evolutionary step that produced human kissing.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Grooming origin: the “groomer’s final kiss” hypothesis
Adriano R. Lameira’s 2024 review surveys proposed origins and focuses on a demanding comparative test. To qualify as a likely precursor, a great-ape behavior would need to resemble human kissing in three dimensions:
- Form: lip protrusion and suction comparable to the movements used in a human kiss.
- Context: interaction between individuals of different ages and sexes, rather than an unrelated feeding or threat display.
- Function: bonding among close or kin individuals, consistent with a social grooming role.
The “groomer’s final kiss” idea imagines that lip-based grooming at the end of a grooming session could have been elaborated into a separate affiliative act. It is an appealing scenario because grooming already involves close contact and social investment. Yet an appealing sequence is not evidence of ancestry.
The missing comparative observation
The crucial unresolved question is whether post-conflict or post-grooming behavior in great apes includes the same lip protrusion or suction seen in human kissing. The available material does not establish that match. Better descriptions of ape behavior—including who performs it, when it occurs, the exact mouth movements and its social outcome—would be needed before the grooming account could move beyond hypothesis.
Why a visual resemblance is insufficient
Animals can bring their mouths together for feeding, aggression, infant care or exploration. Those actions may look superficially similar while having different causes. The three-part test is designed to prevent that confusion: a candidate precursor must match the physical action, the social circumstances and the affiliative function.
Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
Pathogen avoidance and health screening: an adjacent idea, not an established origin
Disease avoidance is relevant to human mate preferences in general. A review of mate preferences and infectious disease discusses how people may respond to cues associated with illness. That evidence is adjacent to the kissing question, but it does not demonstrate that kissing evolved to detect pathogens or screen a partner’s health.
For a pathogen-screening theory to explain kissing, researchers would need evidence that the act itself provides information about infection, that people use that information in mate choice, and that this advantage influenced the behavior’s evolution. General caution around disease, or a preference for apparently healthy partners, cannot substitute for those links.
Kissing can also transmit microbes, which creates a separate issue from evolutionary function. A behavior’s health cost or transmission risk in historical populations does not reveal why it first appeared. Avoidance and transmission are consequences to study, not automatic explanations of origin.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What historical records can—and cannot—tell us
Arbøll and Rasmussen’s 2023 Science article uses Mesopotamian sources to place kissing in historical context, including its role in disease transmission. Written records can show that people practiced, described or interpreted kissing in particular societies. They can also reveal how the behavior was connected with social rules and illness at those times.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Historical documentation begins long after human evolution had already been occurring. A text that records kissing does not mark the moment it evolved, and the absence of an earlier record does not show that people did not kiss. Historical evidence therefore complements, rather than replaces, comparative-primate and human behavioral evidence.
Best Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
How scientists could evaluate the theories
For mate assessment
- Measure sensory cues available during kissing while controlling for other close-contact information.
- Test whether participants make consistent judgments from those cues.
- Determine whether the judgments predict partner choice or relationship outcomes.
- Check whether effects replicate across populations and relationship contexts.
For social bonding
- Compare kissing with other forms of affectionate contact in controlled social situations.
- Measure changes in tension, perceived closeness or reconciliation after the interaction.
- Identify whether effects differ between partners, relatives and other close social ties.
- Look for comparable affiliative acts in closely related primates without assuming that every mouth-to-mouth contact is a kiss.
For a grooming precursor
- Record ape behavior in detail before, during and after grooming or conflict.
- Describe lip position, protrusion, suction, duration and sequence rather than relying on a visual label.
- Document the ages, sexes and relationships of the participants.
- Establish whether the behavior functions as bonding among close or kin individuals.
Each program tests a different claim. Human experiments can address current effects; primate observation can address ancestry; historical texts can address documented practice. None should be treated as interchangeable.
Why a single universal explanation is unlikely to be established soon
Human kissing may combine several layers of history. A behavior that began in one setting could acquire courtship, bonding and symbolic meanings later. Different populations may also use kissing differently, making it difficult to identify one function that applies in every context.
The evidence is uneven across the theories. Mate assessment and bonding can be investigated through direct human outcomes, but those outcomes do not automatically reveal an origin. Grooming offers a concrete ancestral pathway, but it depends on a comparative match that has not yet been demonstrated. Pathogen screening has a plausible connection to broader mate preferences, yet the specific link to kissing remains unproven. Historical sources add context but cannot date the evolutionary event.
The most defensible conclusion is therefore plural and provisional: kissing may serve more than one function, while its original evolutionary pathway remains unresolved.
Further reading
Readers who want a longer treatment of proposed origins can consult The Science of Kissing: What Our Lips Are Telling Us, listed in Lameira’s 2024 review references. The book is optional background; its appearance in a reference list does not turn any of the hypotheses above into established fact.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
