Recommended Free Tools
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
AAA studios bring in external development partners when a project needs more capacity, specialist skills, or shared production effort than the internal team can efficiently provide. The work may be a bounded task—such as bug fixes or a set of art assets—or close collaboration on a larger part of a game. Examples show how studios use these arrangements, but they do not establish that every AAA game uses outside developers or that outsourcing is always cheaper or faster.
What external development partners do
External work covers a range of disciplines. A provider overview from Keywords Studios lists art, engineering, quality assurance (QA), porting, audio, localization, live operations, player support, and marketing. That is a service-provider overview, not a measure of which services are most common across the industry.
“Outsourcing,” “co-development,” and full external development are not interchangeable labels with fixed boundaries. A useful way to understand an arrangement is to ask what work is assigned, how closely the teams collaborate, who sets creative direction and approves deliverables, and whether the partner is adding temporary capacity or specialized expertise.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Why studios bring in partners
To add capacity when schedules or scope outgrow the internal team
A production deadline can arrive before a studio has enough people available to finish the required work. In a 2006 session description, the Game Developers Conference presents the Forza Motorsport case as an example of using external outsourcing to meet tight deadlines while maintaining a high quality bar. The session also flags pitfalls and the need to manage collaboration effectively; its public description does not provide enough detail to support specific process claims. GDC Vault’s session page identifies the case as involving Microsoft Game Studios and Dhruva Interactive.
#1 Best Overall
External teams can also let a studio take on more work without expanding its permanent staff as quickly. In a GamesRadar+ interview about Obsidian’s partnerships, CEO Feargus Urquhart said, “We could not do what we’re doing right now if we didn’t have great development partners and co-dev partners.” He was discussing the studio’s broader work and its collaboration with Eidos Montréal on Grounded 2—not claiming that external development alone explains any studio’s release pace.
To respond to late creative changes
Changes in visual direction can create a burst of production work. A Keywords Studios case study about Borderlands says Gearbox changed the game’s visual direction late in production and brought in Liquid Development to help convert existing assets and create new ones under schedule and budget constraints. The provider-authored retrospective says the work later expanded to additional assets and coordination across partner studios. This illustrates one project’s response to a late change, not a guarantee that adding a partner will resolve schedule or budget pressure.
To access particular technical or production skills
A partner may be brought in for a defined capability rather than to take over a whole project. Bandai Namco Studios’ announcement about ARIKA shows how specific responsibilities can be divided: for Tekken 7, ARIKA handled software improvements, bug fixes, and online-battle operability improvements, while Bandai Namco retained game-balance items. For Tekken 8, Bandai Namco described contracting ARIKA for consultation on network competition algorithms and game response, alongside production work intended to improve user experience. The announcement is a concrete example of a lead studio retaining some decisions while assigning defined work to a partner; it is not a standard contract template for other projects.
How outside work can fit into production
The practical difference between arrangements is the boundary between the teams. A finished asset handed off for review requires a different level of day-to-day integration than a partner team contributing to features alongside the lead studio. The cited projects show both bounded assignments and close collaboration, but they do not establish a universal taxonomy or standard division of responsibilities.
For a close co-development example, GamesRadar+ reports that Obsidian and Eidos Montréal joined forces on Grounded 2, with Obsidian’s internal leadership group working closely with a significant Eidos team. Urquhart described external teams as allowing Obsidian to broaden what it could produce without growing the studio too quickly. That account explains the studio’s approach in this case; it should not be read as a universal formula for scaling game production.
What makes external collaboration difficult
Adding people across company boundaries does not eliminate production work; it changes what must be coordinated. Teams need compatible workflows, clear permissions, secure handling of game data, and reliable ways to share large files and keep work synchronized. Remote collaboration and version control become especially important when multiple groups contribute to the same project.
Rank #4
Perforce’s Mi’pu’mi Games case study describes requirements around access controls, secure data handling, large game assets, shared workflows, and remote collaboration. Mi’pu’mi’s COO and Managing Director, Martin Filipp, said, “The level of security is critical in this line of business.” The case study says the studio used P4 as a central source of truth and P4 Streams templates; Perforce reports that the templates reduced project startup time by over 90%. That is a vendor-reported result for Mi’pu’mi’s project-startup workflow, not a general measure of the time or cost saved by outsourcing.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →- Workflow fit: Partners need a clear way to create, submit, review, and revise work within the project’s pipeline.
- Access and security: Teams must control who can reach sensitive project material and how data is handled.
- Ownership and approvals: The lead studio and partner need clear boundaries for creative direction, technical decisions, and acceptance of deliverables.
- Coordination: Distributed teams need to manage dependencies, communication, and handoffs rather than assuming that added capacity will integrate itself.
What these examples do—and do not—show
External development is a way to allocate production work and expertise across teams. The examples span deadline-driven outsourcing, additional art capacity after a creative change, defined technical work, and close co-development. They do not establish how many AAA games use partners, how much studios save, or whether external work is inherently less expensive or higher quality. “AAA” itself is not formally defined by these sources, so it should not be treated here as a precise budget or team-size category.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
