Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
As of October 12, 2026, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman are the clearest documented examples of AI leaders publicly using “superintelligence.” Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and xAI CEO Elon Musk were reported using “super intelligence” or “SI” at a White House event, but that is evidence of what they said there—not proof of a lasting change in their preferred terminology. The available reporting does not establish a definitive list of CEOs who reject or avoid the term.
Which AI CEOs are documented saying “superintelligence”?
The evidence differs by person: it includes a company announcement describing Zuckerberg’s vision, Altman’s own interview comments, and event-specific remarks reported by Axios. Those forms of evidence should not be treated as interchangeable.
| CEO | Documented wording or behavior | Source and date | What the evidence supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Zuckerberg, Meta | Meta said he shared a vision to bring “personal superintelligence” to everyone. | Meta newsroom, July 30, 2025 | Clear company-published evidence that Zuckerberg publicly uses the term; the sentence is Meta’s description, not a direct quotation from him. |
| Sam Altman, OpenAI | “We are here to build AGI and superintelligence and all the things that come beyond that.” | Bloomberg interview, 2025 | Clear attributable use by Altman in an interview. |
| Jensen Huang, Nvidia | Axios reported that he used “super intelligence” and “SI,” correcting himself after saying “AI.” | Axios, October 1, 2026 | Reported use at a particular White House event, not proof that this is his usual or preferred term. |
| Elon Musk, xAI | Axios reported that he caught himself saying “AI” and pivoted to “SI.” | Axios, October 1, 2026 | Reported event-specific behavior; it does not establish a durable vocabulary change. |
Zuckerberg: “personal superintelligence”
Meta’s July 2025 announcement identifies Zuckerberg as the company’s founder and CEO and describes his vision as bringing personal superintelligence to everyone. A Meta essay published in August 2026 continued that framing, emphasizing access and human control while raising risks such as job displacement, misuse, and surveillance. Those are Meta’s arguments, not independent findings about the technology. Meta, “The Future is for Everyone” (2026).
Altman: superintelligence and scientific discovery
In a 2025 Bloomberg interview, Altman said OpenAI was there to build “AGI and superintelligence and all the things that come beyond that.” Asked what superintelligence means to him, he framed the key question as whether a system could rapidly increase the rate of scientific discovery on Earth. That is Altman’s own practical framing, not a settled definition shared by every company.
#1 Best Overall
Huang and Musk: “SI” at a White House event
Axios’s October 1, 2026 report described Huang and Musk using “SI” during a White House event associated with a terminology shift from “AI.” The report supports describing what they did at that event. It does not establish that either leader has adopted “SI” in ordinary public statements or company communications.
Which CEOs don’t say “superintelligence”?
The available reporting does not name a definitive group of CEOs who reject or avoid the word. Axios reported that some executives at the White House event continued to say “AI,” but the relevant passage did not identify them. It also reported mixed expectations from company representatives about whether “SI” would spread beyond dealings with the president and federal government.
Rank #2
Signing an accord titled “White House Accord on Super Intelligence,” or attending the event, does not prove that a CEO personally prefers the term. Nor does the absence of a located quote prove that someone rejects it. The accurate answer is that named non-users or rejectors are not established by this evidence.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
What do these leaders mean by “superintelligence”?
The term does not have one definition across these sources. Altman’s interview emphasizes a system’s potential to accelerate scientific discovery. An OpenAI governance post by Altman, Greg Brockman, and Ilya Sutskever treats future superintelligence as a capability level requiring special treatment and coordination, alongside public oversight. OpenAI, “Governance of superintelligence” (2023).
Zuckerberg and Meta use “personal superintelligence” in an access-and-empowerment framing. OpenAI’s April 2026 principles statement also uses the term while discussing risks of concentrated control and the goal of broad access. OpenAI, “Our principles” (2026). By contrast, the October 2026 White House coverage describes “super intelligence” or “SI” as a proposed label for AI in a political and public-relations context. These uses share a phrase, but not necessarily the same meaning or purpose.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Does the public prefer “AI” or “super intelligence”?
Axios reported that a YouGov poll conducted during the week of its October 1, 2026 article found 53% preferred “artificial intelligence” and 9% preferred “super intelligence.” This is a poll result as reported by Axios; it should not be read as a measure of CEO vocabulary or as an independently verified industry-wide preference.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
