Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsiTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Short answer: the “Stanford–Elsevier top 2% scientist list” is a Scopus-based database of citation indicators, not an award or an audit of research quality. Its composite c-score combines citation impact with co-authorship and author-position information. Being included means that a researcher met the selection rule for a particular release; it does not certify that every part of the researcher’s work is excellent. Being absent does not show that the researcher does poor work.
The current release identified here is version 9, published by Elsevier on October 7, 2026. It uses an August 1, 2026 snapshot of Scopus, reports career-long data through the end of 2025, and has a separate file for citations received during calendar year 2025. Those dates and the chosen file are essential when you interpret an entry.
What the list actually is
The formal name is Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators. It is a public data release associated with Stanford researchers and Elsevier’s Scopus database. Calling it a “Stanford list” can make it sound like Stanford University grants a distinction. It does not. The release is a statistical database built from author profiles and citation records in Scopus.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Version 9 is an archived release. Elsevier says that it will not be changed after publication. If a Scopus author profile has a wrong affiliation, a missing paper, a duplicate identity, or a paper assigned to the wrong person, the correction route is Scopus’s Author Feedback Wizard. A successful correction can be considered in a future annual update; it does not retroactively rewrite version 9.
#1 Best Overall
- Powerful Turbo Fan:CAGIWIRU Electric Air Duster have reached speed up to 130000RPM,Can efficient remove dust and debris.With LED light and Three Adjustable Speed to meet with different cleaning tasks.
- With Attached USB C Fasting Charging cable.Charing 3 hours,Enjoy up to 240 minutes of use on the lowest setting, For third speed can use for 25mins.with four charging options to meet with your needs.
- Wide Application: attached 5 different nozzles,making it suitable for a variety of scenes, such as car,pet, pc, keyboards, and other electronic devices. It also serves for office and home clean duster.
- Handy Design & Portable:Cordless air duster electric nozzle is Light weight and small size, design and comfortable to hold and space saving, convenient to carry around. You can put it in your room or inside the car without taking up space.
- Economical &Reusable: Built durable materials with a long-lasting battery,our CAGIWIRU air duster it's a sustainable alternative to disposable air cans.
Version 9 at a glance
| Item | What version 9 specifies |
|---|---|
| Publisher and release date | Elsevier Data Repository, October 7, 2026 |
| Underlying data | Scopus author profiles and citation records |
| Scopus snapshot | August 1, 2026 |
| Career-long citation cutoff | End of 2025 |
| Single-year citation period | Calendar year 2025 |
| Classification | 20 scientific fields and 174 subfields under the Science-Metrix classification |
| Main selection rule | Top 100,000 by c-score, calculated with and without self-citations, or a subfield percentile rank of 2% or above |
A number copied from an older edition, university page, or news article is not automatically a version 9 number. Always name the release before comparing entries.
What the c-score measures
Elsevier describes the c-score as an impact measure rather than a productivity measure. In practical terms, it rewards citation influence and adjusts the picture for collaboration and the researcher’s position in the author list. A person does not move up merely by publishing a larger number of papers.
The foundational method is the 2019 peer-reviewed PLOS Biology paper by John P. A. Ioannidis, Jeroen Baas, Richard Klavans, and Kevin W. Boyack. That paper lists six components. The version 9 repository description retains the same broad idea while adding current data categories and reporting options. The components should therefore be read as the method’s foundation, not as a guarantee that every implementation detail is identical in every release.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
| Component | What it captures |
|---|---|
| Total citations | The number of citations received by the author’s indexed work. |
| Hirsch h-index | A combined measure of output and citation concentration: an h-index of h means at least h papers have at least h citations each. |
| Co-authorship-adjusted hm-index | A Schreiber hm-index that adjusts the effective paper count for the number of co-authors. |
| Citations to single-author papers | Impact where the researcher is the sole author. |
| Citations to single- or first-author papers | Impact where the researcher is sole author or listed first. |
| Citations to single-, first-, or last-author papers | Impact where the researcher is sole, first, or last author. |
Version 9 also supplies citation measures with and without self-citations, the ratio of citations to citing papers, and information about retracted papers and citations to or from retracted papers. These are additional indicators for interpretation; they do not turn the c-score into a peer review.
Rank #2
- Screen Cleaner is Your Screen’s New Bestfriend! - EVEO is proud to present a screen cleaner that’s perfectly suited for your TV. Meet your new screen cleaner, computer screen cleaner, laptop cleaner, iPad cleaner, Macbook,tv cleaner or any other electronic device. Our screen cleaner spray and wipe along with the included plush microfiber cloth, easily removes dust, fingerprints & other smudges on the screen’s surface. Clean effectively for a streak-free screen
- Gentle on your Screens - Our screen cleaner spray and wipes is compatible to be used even for the most sensitive LCD, LED, CRT, and OLED screens in proper use. Be at ease knowing that this product is compatible with all the major brands: LG, SONY, Samsung, Sharp, iPad, iPhone, Android screens, Kindle, PC monitors - we’ve got you covered! Can be used as LCD screen cleaner, tv cleaner, smart tv screen cleaner, and more
- Premium Super Soft Plush Microfiber Cloth - Included in this efficient screen cleaning kit. This screen cleaner spray and wipe has our signature plush microfiber cloth specially designed to comply with screens and monitors and leave them streak-free. Has been shown to effectively absorbs stubborn stains, zero streaks, and no fiber shedding. Always use this together with our screen cleaner for the best results
- Easy-to-Use Screen Cleaner Kit + microfiber cleaning cloth - The EVEO Screen Cleaning Kit will easily be your new favorite tool when it comes to taking care of the things you love most, quick and easy solution for a streak-free screen. Simply screw on the sprayer gun on the screen cleaner bottle. Spray the cleaning liquid onto the microfiber cloth, then wipe the screen until desired cleanliness & shine is achieved.
- Quality Screen Care Kit Worth Purchasing - Enjoy a convenient Screen Cleaner anytime, anywhere you need it. Your satisfaction is our top priority. We stand behind the quality of our products and that’s why, you shouldn’t be worrying at all. We manufacture the Best Screen Cleaner. and can be used for laptop cleaning kit, laptop screen cleaner, tv screen cleaner for smart tv. MacBook screen cleaner, monitor cleaner or screen cleaner spray for electronic devices with microfiber cleaning cloth
How scientists are selected
The release applies its rule to the values calculated from the specified Scopus snapshot. A scientist can qualify through either of two routes: ranking among the top 100,000 scientists by the composite c-score (the release presents versions with and without self-citations), or reaching a subfield percentile rank of 2% or above under the database’s selection convention.
The percentile route is intended to provide a field-sensitive comparison. Version 9 assigns authors to 20 broad fields and 174 subfields using Science-Metrix categories. For scientists with at least five papers, it provides field and subfield percentiles that show how the indicator compares with other authors in that classification. “Top 2%” therefore refers to a citation-indicator threshold within the release’s population and categories, not to a universal examination of all scientists or all forms of scholarly contribution.
Why two c-score versions appear
Self-citations can be legitimate: a research group may build a coherent line of work and cite its earlier methods. They can also inflate an indicator when used excessively. Version 9 reports metrics both including and excluding self-citations so that readers can see whether the selection outcome is sensitive to that choice. The presence of an exclusion calculation is not a finding of misconduct, and the inclusion calculation is not proof that self-citations are harmless.
Recommended Free Tools
Career-long and single-year files answer different questions
The database separates a long-horizon view from a recent-year view. They should never be described as two names for the same ranking.
Rank #3
- 【Large size】：Measuring 800 x 300 mm/ 31. 5×12 inches, which is wider and taller than others. Large mouse pad can perfectly fit your keyboard and mouse of any size, and there is also ample space for peripherals such as phones, tablets, etc.
- 【LED backlight mouse pad】：Blade Hawks RGB mouse pad provides 7 static modes and 7 dynamic modes will give you the options you are looking for. Power-off memory function remembers the last lighting mode you selected. The super glow fiber Chroma will give you a colorful gaming setup that you want.
- 【Anti-slip rubber base】：Made from Natural rubber, this gaming mousepad will firmly grip your desktop, allowing you to enjoy the ultimate precision in the games you are most passionate about. It also comes with a texture that enhances this ability even further.
- 【Smooth and waterproof surface】: Micro-textured cloth surface, for extremely precise mouse control and a smooth movement. When liquid splashes on the gaming mouse pad, it forms water droplets and slides down. Will not delay your work or gameplay.
- 【Plug and play】: This mouse and keyboard pad is powered by USB, plug and play, no driver required. One button control light modes. Press one time to change the lighting mode, press twice to change the brightness, press and hold about 3 seconds turn ON/OFF.
| Dimension | Career-long listing | Single-year listing |
|---|---|---|
| Citation window in version 9 | Career data through December 31, 2025 | Citations received during calendar year 2025 |
| Question answered | Who has accumulated substantial citation impact across the release’s career window? | Who received unusually strong citation attention in one recent year? |
| Effect of career length | Older researchers generally have more time for papers to accumulate citations. | The one-year view reduces the simple advantage of having many years of accumulation, although established authors may still have larger visible portfolios. |
| Best use | Studying sustained influence, with the release date and career cutoff stated. | Studying recent momentum or a particular year, without treating it as a lifetime judgment. |
The original method paper presented the one-year view partly as a way to reduce the advantage created by additional years of citation accumulation. It also warned that early-career researchers have fewer papers and less time for those papers to be cited, so a single-year or career-long absence is not a verdict on potential.
What information an entry can contain
A version 9 record can include the raw and derived indicators needed to inspect the score rather than relying on a badge. Look for:
- citation counts and h-index values;
- the co-authorship-adjusted hm-index;
- citation counts for single-author, first-author, and last-author positions;
- values calculated with self-citations and with self-citations removed;
- the ratio of citations to citing papers, which helps distinguish many citations concentrated in a small number of citing documents from a broader citing base;
- the assigned field and subfield and the associated percentiles, where the author has at least five papers;
- information on retracted papers and citations involving retracted papers.
These fields make the database more transparent than a simple list of names, but they still describe indexed citation activity. They do not supply a reading of the papers, an assessment of methods, or an account of contributions outside the Scopus record.
What inclusion means—and what it does not
What inclusion does indicate
Inclusion indicates that the author’s profile and citation indicators met the version’s threshold under the selected time window, self-citation treatment, and field or subfield classification. It is evidence of high measured citation impact in that dataset. For a hiring, funding, or collaboration decision, it can be one screening signal among several.
Rank #4
- 【Softer and More Comfortable】Vaydeer wrist rest has unique diamond pattern, which is the combination of softness and aesthetics. The materials of wrist rest are improved into higher quality memory foam and covered with silky smooth lycra. The computer wrist rest makes you as comfortable and cushiony as like rest your wrists on clouds.
- 【Ergonomic Wrist Saver】The wrist rests for keyboard and mouse comes with a 17.32×3.15×0.83 inch keyboard wrist pad and a 5.94×3.15×0.83 inch mouse wrist support. Based on ergonomic design, the unique concave shape is the perfect fit for your wrist joints. The wrist rest pad fits most computer keyboards and laptops, improve hand and wrist posture, release your wrist and arm stress.
- 【Non-Slip Rubber Bottom】Featuring an anti-skid silicone base on the bottom, this wrist keyboard support stays firmly in place on your desk, preventing the padding from sliding around, ensuring stable and consistent wrist support during extended computer sessions.
- 【Better Experience & Pain Relief】Our keyboard arm rest is beneficial to alleviate the soreness caused by direct contact and friction between your arm and a hard desk surface, reducing the risk of wrist fatigue or carpal tunnel. The soft texture of memory foam can evenly distribute the pressure around your wrists and provide good support with just enough give.
- 【Helpful in Multiple Scenarios】Whether you're working, studying, writing, typing, gaming, this keyboard and mouse rest combo is an essential accessory to add comfort and support to your hands and wrists. It’s also a great gift for men, women, family, friend, coworker, gamer, teacher, etc.
What inclusion does not establish
- It does not certify that the researcher’s findings are correct, important, reproducible, or ethically produced.
- It does not measure teaching, supervision, mentoring, public communication, software, data stewardship, clinical service, policy work, or societal impact.
- It does not prove that the researcher made the largest intellectual contribution to every highly cited paper.
- It does not establish that a paper’s citations are positive; citations can be critical, perfunctory, or connected to disputed findings.
- It does not constitute a prize granted by Stanford University.
Elsevier explicitly cautions against presenting the database as “absolute evidence of excellence.” The same warning applies in reverse: a scientist who is missing did not reach the release’s composite-indicator threshold, but that absence does not mean the person does poor work.
Six caveats that change how you should read a ranking
1. Release date and snapshot matter
Citation databases are moving snapshots. Version 9 uses Scopus data available on August 1, 2026, while its career-long indicators run through the end of 2025 and its single-year indicators cover 2025. A later correction, newly indexed paper, changed author profile, or additional citation is outside that archived calculation. When quoting a result, state “version 9” and the relevant cutoff instead of writing simply “the scientist is in the top 2%.”
2. Self-citation is a diagnostic, not a verdict
Compare the with-self-citations and without-self-citations columns. A large difference merits inspection of the publication and citation patterns, but it is not by itself evidence of manipulation. The 2019 method paper notes that self-citation levels vary by field and career and that extreme patterns require case-by-case scrutiny. Removing self-citations also cannot answer every concern: coordinated citation practices, reciprocal citations, and citation of a shared method can require reading the underlying papers.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
3. Author profiles can be split or merged
Scopus author identifiers are assembled from publication metadata. A researcher can have two profiles, or a profile can contain another person’s papers, especially when names, affiliations, or transliterations overlap. The 2019 paper documented this profile-matching problem and reported historical performance figures, not a permanent guarantee. Check the author’s publication list and use the Author Feedback Wizard when a profile needs correction.
Best Value
- 【No Drill Mounted】Cable management tray can be assembled in as little as 3 minutes or less-simply. Side clips easily clampe the edge of desk, pass through the holes on the sides, and secure excess cables with baskets. Desk cable management supports inward or outward installation to meet your needs in different scenarios, and provides you with great convenience when collecting and organizing wires.
- 【Rubber Pad Protects Desk】Wire organizer under desk built-in soft rubber pads on the clamp protect your desk from scratches, so you will not damage your furniture or office.
- 【Sturdy and Beautiful】Cord management under desk is made of high-quality carbon steel and holds about 15 lbs. The wire basket has 2 holes on each side of the tray to enable your cables to pass freely. Cable baskets are suitable for desk thickness use from 0.4" to 2.4".
- 【Space Saving & Keep Organized】Desk cable management tray holds all your power cords, outlet strips, USB hubs and computer transformers hidden from your feet, and the data cables will not enter the vacuum cleaner to keep your desk clean and tidy. Desk wire organizer is also suitable for use in the kitchen and outdoors.
- 【Reduce Safety Risks】Cable tray under desk keeps all plugs away from your kids, no more worry about tripping. Using 2 holes wire tray saves extra space, helps you easily cabling and wire protection. The mesh design is not easy to accumulate dust, but avoids safety accidents caused by messy wires.
4. Field comparisons are not automatically fair
Different disciplines cite at different rates. A paper in a citation-dense field can accumulate references faster than an equally influential paper in a field where citations are less common. Science-Metrix subfields and percentiles reduce some of that mismatch, but they do not eliminate it. The original authors cautioned that comparisons between fields with different citation densities are tenuous and that very small subfields can behave differently from broad categories. Treat a percentile as conditional on its assigned category, not as a universal scientific value.
5. Retraction information flags questions, not conclusions
Version 9 reports retracted papers and citations to or from retracted papers. Use those fields to identify records that need inspection: determine which paper was retracted, when, why, and whether later citations relied on the retracted result. A flag is not a complete research-integrity adjudication, and no flag should be interpreted without the relevant journal notice and paper context.
6. Early-career researchers are structurally disadvantaged
Citations need time to accumulate, and an author with only a few papers has less opportunity to reach a high h-index or a large total. The original method paper therefore cautioned that citation indicators have limited use when a researcher is early in a career or has few indexed publications. Compare people at similar career stages and use qualitative evidence for promising work that has not yet had time to attract citations.
Historical numbers that are often misquoted
The following figures come from the 2019 PLOS Biology paper and describe its historical datasets. They are not measurements of version 9.
| Figure | What it described |
|---|---|
| 12.7% | Median self-citation percentage among the top 100,000 authors in the paper’s 1996–2017 career-long dataset. |
| 9.2% | Median self-citation percentage among the top 100,000 authors in the paper’s 2017 single-year dataset. |
| 6,880,389 | Scientists with at least five papers in the Scopus population table described by that paper. |
| 98% precision | Historical 2017 Scopus author-profile performance reported by the paper. |
| 93.5% average recall | Another historical 2017 profile-performance measure reported by the paper. |
The authors also reported later improved profile figures from April 2019. None of these historical evaluations guarantees the accuracy of every profile in a 2026 release, and none should be substituted for checking the current record.
A practical way to evaluate a listing
- Identify the exact release. Record the version number, publication date, Scopus snapshot, and citation cutoff. For the current release, those are version 9, October 7, 2026, August 1, 2026, and the end of 2025 for career data.
- Choose the correct time horizon. Decide whether the claim concerns the career-long file or citations received in calendar year 2025. Do not use a single-year result as a lifetime ranking.
- Check the selection route. Determine whether the author qualified through the top-100,000 c-score route or the subfield-percentile route. The route affects what “top 2%” means in context.
- Read the field assignment. Note the Science-Metrix field and subfield, and confirm that a percentile is being compared within that category. Be especially cautious with very small subfields.
- Compare self-citation treatments. Inspect the indicators with and without self-citations. Investigate a large gap rather than treating it as automatic misconduct or ignoring it entirely.
- Validate the author profile. Check whether the listed papers belong to the person, whether duplicate profiles exist, and whether major publications are missing. Submit corrections through Scopus’s Author Feedback Wizard when needed.
- Inspect the composition of impact. Use the single-, first-, and last-author citation columns to understand how collaboration and author position contribute. A high total dominated by large team papers answers a different question from a high count on single-author work.
- Review retraction indicators. Open the relevant journal notices and determine whether a retracted paper or citation materially affects the interpretation.
- Add evidence the database cannot measure. Read representative papers, examine methods and replication, and consider mentoring, openness, data or software contributions, teaching, and real-world effects.
- State the conclusion narrowly. A defensible sentence names the release and says that the author met its citation-indicator rule. It avoids converting that result into a claim about total scientific excellence.
Common misreadings to avoid
- “Stanford awarded this scientist a top-2% honor.” No: it is a database associated with Stanford researchers and Elsevier’s Scopus data.
- “Top 2% means the top 2% of all scientists in every sense.” No: it is a release-specific citation-indicator selection using defined fields, subfields, profiles, and time windows.
- “The career and single-year lists are interchangeable.” No: one accumulates career-window citations and the other counts citations in one calendar year.
- “Excluding self-citations makes the result unbiased.” No: it provides another view, but field practices, reciprocal citation, profile errors, and paper context still matter.
- “Not listed means low quality.” No: early career, field citation density, indexing, profile errors, and the threshold can all affect inclusion.
- “A retraction flag proves misconduct.” No: it identifies a record for investigation and does not replace an integrity finding.
Bottom line
The Stanford–Elsevier top 2% database is best understood as a dated, Scopus-based measurement of citation impact. Its c-score adds information about co-authorship and author position, and its career-long and single-year files let you ask different questions. Use the release metadata, field assignment, self-citation views, profile quality, and retraction information before drawing a conclusion. The result can be useful evidence of measured citation influence; it is not a certificate of a scientist’s overall quality, contribution, or integrity.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
