What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The IRS found that some organizations claiming tax-exempt charitable status had shifted from education and individualized counseling to selling debt-management plans. In examinations completed by May 15, 2006, it found organizations that provided little or no education, operated commercially, or served the private interests of directors, officers, and related entities. Those findings concerned selected organizations—not the entire credit counseling industry.
Why the IRS investigated credit counseling organizations
The IRS began a broader compliance effort after credit counseling exemption applications rose rapidly in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Its May 15, 2006 report also cited allegations of improper activity, changes in federal and state law, and the introduction of bankruptcy counseling certification requirements as context for the initiative.
The agency was concerned that some organizations had moved away from a nonprofit model centered on advice, counseling, and limited debt-management plans. The report described entities that were primarily selling debt-reduction plans while providing little or no education, as well as cases in which related for-profit businesses or organizational insiders benefited. The report did not conclude that every credit counseling organization behaved this way.
How broad was the 2006 examination project?
The IRS selected 63 organizations for examination. They represented 56% of the identified industry’s revenue, based on the latest IRS filing data available at the time. That figure describes the selected organizations’ share of historical industry revenue; it is not a current market estimate.
The IRS used information from exemption applications, referrals from federal and state agencies, and indicators involving organizational structure, relationships, and compensation. It also reviewed large organizations’ Form 990 filings. Separately, the agency reported compliance checks involving more than 700 organizations.
Examination results reported in May 2006
By the May 15 report cutoff, 41 of the 63 examinations were complete. Nine organizations had their exempt status revoked or were terminated. The IRS had proposed revocation in the remaining completed cases; those proposals should not be described as final revocations. The report also said the IRS Criminal Investigation Division had accepted a number of referrals.
Exemption applications reviewed
The project’s application review identified 110 applications that appeared to warrant in-depth development. The IRS reported that 30 had become final denials following proposed denials, 48 failed to establish exempt status after not fully responding, 10 were withdrawn, and three met section 501(c)(3) requirements. These are counts from the 2006 project, not current application statistics.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →What the IRS considered meaningful counseling
The IRS looked beyond whether an organization used the word “counseling.” It considered whether the service helped clients understand their financial problems and build skills to address them, and whether recommendations reflected each client’s circumstances. A key distinction was whether counseling genuinely explored options or mainly served as a route into a debt-management plan (DMP), regardless of the client’s interests.
In assessing an organization’s actual purpose and practices, the IRS considered factors including:
- Whether counseling and recommendations were tailored to clients’ individual financial circumstances.
- Whether the organization’s marketing and client interviews matched its stated educational purpose.
- Whether counselors had appropriate training and whether the service developed clients’ ability to manage their finances.
- Whether clients were steered into DMPs without regard to their interests.
- Whether founders, officers, directors, or related for-profit companies received private benefits.
How current section 501(q) criteria add to the picture
Current section 501(q) criteria supplement the general requirements for exemption under section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4). The IRS’s current summaries address how services are delivered, fees, referrals, credit-repair activity, and governance. They are not a restatement of the 2006 project’s findings.
- Tailored services: Counseling must take consumers’ circumstances into account.
- Fees and access: Fees must be reasonable, with waivers when a consumer cannot pay. An organization may not refuse service because a consumer cannot pay or is unwilling to enroll in a DMP.
- Credit repair and referrals: Credit-repair services are limited to incidental services without a separate charge, and referral payments are restricted.
- Governance and ownership: The criteria include limits on board composition and ownership.
These statutory criteria address whether an organization qualifies for tax exemption. They do not, by themselves, establish that a particular provider is appropriate for an individual consumer.
Which agency handles tax exemption, consumer protection, and bankruptcy approval?
Different federal agencies make different decisions. Tax-exempt status is not the same as permission to provide bankruptcy-related services, and neither status is a blanket endorsement of a provider.
| Agency | Role described in the federal guidance |
|---|---|
| Internal Revenue Service (IRS) | Determines whether an organization claiming tax-exempt status meets federal tax requirements. |
| Federal Trade Commission (FTC) | Brings actions involving violations of federal consumer-protection law. |
| U.S. Trustee Program | Approves organizations to provide pre-bankruptcy counseling and pre-discharge debtor education. |
For current information, consult the IRS summary of section 501(q) criteria and its joint federal agency resources. The IRS also directs the public to its charity-status search. An organization’s tax-exempt status should not be described as “IRS approval” of its services in the broader consumer or bankruptcy sense.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the findings do—and do not—show
The 2006 report documents the results of a targeted, ongoing compliance project. It shows that the IRS found serious problems among some of the organizations it examined, including failures to provide education, commercial-style operations, and private benefits. The project’s historical counts do not establish how prevalent those practices are today, and they do not describe every credit counseling organization.
For the original findings, see the IRS’s Credit Counseling Report: Credit Counseling Compliance Project (May 15, 2006) and its Credit Counseling Compliance Project Frequently Asked Questions (September 30, 2006).
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
