iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Statistics Canada estimated that employment fell by 68,000 in September 2026 and the unemployment rate rose to 6.5%. Economists saw a warning about labour-market weakness—not proof of a recession or an automatic reason for the Bank of Canada to change rates. Their October 28 decision was still ahead as of October 11, and they expected the Bank to weigh volatile monthly data against inflation risks.
What happened in September’s jobs report?
Statistics Canada’s Labour Force Survey, released October 9, estimated a seasonally adjusted employment decline of 68,000, or 0.3%, from August. The unemployment rate rose 0.1 percentage points to 6.5%. The survey’s reference week was September 13–19; this is a household survey estimate, not a tally of announced layoffs. Statistics Canada’s Labour Force Survey is the source for the official estimates.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Principles of Economics | $256.55 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Basic Economics: A Common Sense Guide to the Economy | $25.49 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Economics For Dummies: Book + Chapter Quizzes Online | $17.49 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Principles of Economics | $177.90 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Understanding Economics, Student Edition (ECONOMICS PRINCIPLES & PRACTIC) | $46.47 | Buy on Amazon |
September was the second consecutive month of decline: employment fell by 42,000 in August. That weakness followed 181,000 jobs added from April through July, and employment remained 95,000 higher than a year earlier. A Reuters consensus forecast carried by Investing.com had expected a gain of 9,200 jobs, making the reported decline a substantial miss against that forecast.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Why did economists call it a warning, but not a verdict?
The report contains evidence of softer labour demand, but it does not describe a broad, sudden wave of layoffs. The layoff rate was 0.7%, close to 0.6% a year earlier and the 2017–2019 average. At the same time, the job-finding rate was 30.6%, down from 32.8% a year earlier and below the 2017–2019 average of 36.5%. Those indicators point in different directions: layoffs were not unusually high, while finding work had become harder.
#1 Best Overall
Monthly estimates are volatile, and September often brings seasonal pressure on youth employment as students return to school. The decline also followed a period of gains rather than an uninterrupted fall. These qualifications argue against treating one release as a definitive recession signal; they do not erase the two-month decline or weaker job-finding rate.
Which workers and sectors accounted for the decline?
The losses were uneven. All figures below are seasonally adjusted; Canada-level Labour Force Survey estimates exclude the territories.
| Group or sector | September change | Additional context |
|---|---|---|
| Youth aged 15–24 | Employment fell 48,000, or 1.8% | Down 67,000 over two months; the youth labour force also shrank by 50,000, while unemployment was little changed at 13.0%. |
| Women aged 25–54 | Employment fell 28,000 | Their unemployment rate rose 0.3 percentage points to 5.3%. |
| Public sector | Employment fell 70,000 | Fourth consecutive monthly decline. |
| Private sector | Little changed | Employment remained 163,000 higher year over year. |
| Education | Employment fell 35,000 | Down 67,000, or 4.2%, year over year; Statistics Canada linked much of that annual decline to Quebec, Ontario, and Alberta. |
| Health care and social assistance | Employment fell 23,000 | Still up 93,000, or 3.2%, year over year, the largest contribution to annual employment growth. |
| Manufacturing | Employment fell 13,000 | After an August increase, it was little changed year over year. |
| Quebec | Employment fell 49,000 | Statistics Canada said employment had been trending downward since the start of the year. |
| British Columbia | Employment fell 20,000 | |
| Alberta | Employment rose 23,000 |
The youth decline was a major part of September’s movement, but the youth labour force also contracted, so the drop in employment does not translate one-for-one into a higher youth unemployment rate. Statistics Canada attributed most of the year-over-year decline in participation to population aging: the participation rate was 64.8%, its lowest level since December 1997 excluding the pandemic.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Rank #2
Did U.S. tariffs cause the jobs shock?
The release does not establish that tariffs caused the aggregate employment decline. September was described in market reporting as the first full month covered after a new round of U.S. tariffs took effect, but the largest losses were in public-sector-related industries. Economists differed on how much trade exposure explained the result.
Andrew Grantham, an economist at CIBC, told Canadian Mortgage Professional on October 9 that the weakness was “likely more a reflection of data volatility than the impact of new US tariffs.” He nevertheless noted that hours worked suggested a weak end to third-quarter GDP and a weak handoff to the fourth quarter, with possible further unemployment increases in tariff-impacted sectors.
What did the economists say about the Bank of Canada?
The October 9 roundup by Canadian Mortgage Professional reported broadly similar expectations of an October hold, but not identical reasoning. These were reported written comments and notes, not necessarily direct interviews.
Rank #3
Charles St-Arnaud: patience amid conflicting risks
The chief economist at Servus Credit Union said the report “adds to the BoC’s dilemma.” He cited an uncertain outlook, a weak labour market, and a likely growth slowdown amid intensifying trade tensions, balanced against high fuel prices that could feed broader inflation. He expected the Bank to keep its policy rate unchanged for the rest of the year unless CPI data showed inflation broadening.
Claire Fan: avoid overreading one month
RBC senior economist Claire Fan wrote that monthly employment counts are “notoriously volatile” and there were reasons not to read too much into the softer result too quickly. She pointed to seasonal headwinds for youth after school resumes and expected earlier labour-market gains to be largely sustained.
Andrew Hencic: a two-month pause, not a clean bill of health
TD Economics director and senior economist Andrew Hencic said the labour market had “taken a breather for two consecutive months.” He emphasized the unemployment rate and said the report would “pour some more cold water on near-term rate hike expectations.” His October hold forecast remained data-dependent.
Rank #4
Andrew Grantham: volatility and weak hours
Grantham said the softness supported CIBC’s call for the Bank to remain patient and hold rates for now. He also flagged hours worked as a sign of a weak end to the third quarter and a weak start-point for fourth-quarter growth.
Sherry Cooper: inflation could change the calculation
Dominion Lending Centres chief economist Dr. Sherry Cooper wrote that the Bank would likely hold off on a hike, especially if inflation data due October 19 brought no “nasty surprises.” She also noted that Canadian bond yields were more than 100 basis points below U.S. yields, while typically moving in the same direction.
What does the report mean for interest rates and borrowers?
As of October 11, the Bank of Canada’s October 28 decision had not been announced. The economists’ expected hold was a forecast, not a promise. Weak employment and hours could weigh against rate increases, while wage growth and fuel-price inflation could make the Bank cautious about easing.
Average hourly wages rose 2.3% year over year in September, up from 2.0% in August. That is a counterweight to the employment weakness when policymakers consider inflation. The release alone does not settle whether the Bank will cut, hold, or raise rates; the inflation data and subsequent economic evidence also matter.
For households, the policy rate directly affects variable-rate mortgages and lines of credit. Fixed mortgage rates are driven mainly by bond yields, so a weak jobs report does not guarantee cheaper fixed borrowing. A forecast about the Bank’s next move is not individualized financial advice.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
