iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Donald Trump’s 2026 campaign to replace “artificial intelligence” with “super intelligence” is a political naming effort, not evidence that a new technical class of machine intelligence has appeared. Axios reported that Trump instructed U.S. government documents in September to use “super intelligence,” then wrote on October 8 that people who continued to say “Artificial Intelligence” were “THE ENEMY.” The available Google Trends material does not verify the headline’s claimed threefold U.S. increase or a worldwide collapse in searches for “Enemy” AI.
What Trump said and when
Axios reported two related developments in 2026:
- In September, Trump announced that U.S. government documents should refer to AI as “super intelligence.”
- On October 8, he escalated the terminology dispute in a post stating:
The White House considers anyone that uses the term, “Artificial Intelligence,” as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, “Super Intelligence,” THE ENEMY!
Those statements describe an administrative and political branding campaign. They do not announce a verified technical breakthrough, a new product category, or a scientific consensus that “super intelligence” has replaced “artificial intelligence.”
“Super intelligence” in politics versus “superintelligence” in science
The wording matters because the two expressions are being used in different ways. Trump’s preferred label is generally written as two words, “super intelligence,” and is being applied broadly to existing AI work. In AI-safety and philosophy literature, superintelligence is an established concept associated especially with philosopher Nick Bostrom’s 2014 book Superintelligence.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteNature describes Bostrom’s technical idea as an intellect that “greatly exceeds the cognitive performance of humans in virtually all domains of interest.” That definition describes a hypothetical or future capability benchmark: performance substantially beyond humans across nearly every relevant area, rather than any ordinary chatbot, image model, search assistant or government software now carrying a new name.
#1 Best Overall
| Term | How it is being used | What it does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence (AI) | The longstanding umbrella term for machine systems that perform tasks associated with perception, prediction, language, reasoning or decision-making. | It does not imply that a system is conscious or superior to humans. |
| “Super intelligence” | Trump’s preferred political and administrative label for AI in 2026. | It is not, by itself, proof of a new capability level or scientific category. |
| Superintelligence | Bostrom’s technical concept: an intellect that greatly surpasses humans across virtually all domains. | The term does not mean every current AI system meets that threshold. |
Are Americans switching terms?
Not according to the public-preference figures reported by Axios. A 2026 YouGov poll found that 53% of respondents preferred “artificial intelligence,” while 9% preferred “super intelligence.” The figures indicate a substantial gap in favor of the familiar term, although a poll preference is not the same as a search-volume measurement or a binding language rule.
Axios also described technology executives repeating or adopting the new label while institutions continued to use “AI.” That split is predictable: agencies may follow a government style instruction, while researchers, companies, standards bodies and the public retain terminology that already has technical and commercial meaning.
Rank #2
- Used Book in Good Condition
What Google Trends can—and cannot—prove
Google’s official Artificial Intelligence Search Trends page displays normalized search interest on a 0–100 scale. A value is relative to the highest point in the selected query, date range, geography and category; it is not a count of searches and cannot be compared across two charts unless the settings and terms are identical.
Recommended Free Tools
The retrieved Trends material does not include a reproducible query, date range, geography, category or value series for “Trump’s super intelligence,” a threefold rise, or “enemy AI.” Consequently, the following claims remain unverified:
- That searches for “super intelligence” increased exactly threefold in the United States.
- That a particular U.S. baseline and endpoint produce a 3X result.
- That people elsewhere in the world are “ignoring” the terminology.
- That searches for “Enemy” AI are declining globally.
A defensible Trends claim would need the exact terms (including capitalization and spelling), a stated U.S. geography, a defined start and end date, a category choice, and the exported or otherwise reproducible series. Without those details, a chart can show that interest changed relative to its own peak, but not establish the headline’s multiplier or a worldwide comparison.
Why the wording dispute matters
Government communication
If federal offices adopt “super intelligence” in documents, readers may encounter both labels in official material. That can create search and records problems: a person looking for guidance under “artificial intelligence” may miss a document indexed under the newer phrase, while existing statutes, procurement language and standards may continue to use AI.
Rank #4
Technical precision
Using “super intelligence” for all AI collapses an important distinction between present-day systems and the much stronger capability described by Bostrom. A model can be highly capable in a narrow task without exceeding human performance across virtually every domain.
Public understanding
The YouGov figures show that the proposed replacement is not the public’s preferred wording in the cited poll. Changing a label can influence perceptions of capability and risk, but it does not change how a model works, what data it uses, how it is evaluated, or what safeguards apply.
Best Value
- Rick's Travel-Inspired Perspectives: Essays on how travel has shaped his world view
- Cultural Insights: Lessons we can learn from other countries and cultures
- 2021 Updated Print Edition: New chapter added based on Rick's pre-pandemic travels in Ethiopia and Guatemala
How to read the 2026 story accurately
- Separate the announcement from the measurement. Trump’s statements document a naming preference; they do not measure adoption.
- Separate search interest from public opinion. YouGov’s 53%-to-9% result concerns preferred terminology, while Google Trends reports relative search interest.
- Check the technical definition. “Superintelligence” has a pre-existing meaning that is far narrower and more demanding than a rename of ordinary AI.
- Demand reproducible settings for multiplier claims. A “3X” statement is incomplete without terms, geography, dates, category and the underlying series.
The evidence therefore supports a story about a U.S. political language campaign and the resistance of established terminology—not a confirmed threefold search surge or proof that the rest of the world has abandoned interest in “Enemy” AI.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
