The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Fingerprints preserved on unbaked clay ornaments have allowed archaeologists to identify the probable age groups of their makers for the first time in Paleolithic archaeology. A Science Advances study led by Laurent Davin of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem examined 142 Natufian beads, pendants and a child-sized ring from four sites in present-day Israel and documented 50 readable fingerprints. The prints belong to children, adolescents and adults, showing that ornament production was a multigenerational activity before pottery and farming existed.
What the study discovered
The artifacts are approximately 15,000 years old and come from el-Wad, Nahal Oren, Hayonim and Eynan-Mallaha. They were made by Natufian hunter-gatherers during a period when communities were beginning to live more permanently in one place but still relied on hunting and gathering.
The Hebrew University describes the collection as the first archaeological assemblage in which researchers could directly identify the makers of Paleolithic ornaments, and as the largest known group of fingerprints from this period. Fingerprint ridge measurements indicate age groups rather than individual identities: archaeologists cannot recover names, match the prints to living people or make a modern forensic identification.
Recommended Free Tools
A child’s print on a butterfly bead
One butterfly-shaped bead from Eynan-Mallaha preserves the print of a child estimated to have been about 10 years old. Other prints indicate participation by adolescents and adults. The evidence therefore supports shared production across generations, although it does not show that every ornament was made by a child or that all objects served one identical purpose.
#1 Best Overall
How archaeologists inferred who made the beads
Because the ornaments were formed from clay that was never fired, impressions left while the material was soft could remain on their surfaces. Researchers examined the preserved ridge patterns and used ridge dimensions to estimate whether a maker was a child, adolescent or adult. This is a probabilistic age assessment, not a personal identification.
- Locate preserved impressions: Researchers document fingerprints that remain legible on the clay surface.
- Measure ridge characteristics: The spacing and scale of fingerprint ridges provide clues about the maker’s developmental age.
- Assign an age group: Prints are classified broadly as child, adolescent or adult, with uncertainty inherent in the method.
- Interpret the production context: The mix of age groups is evaluated alongside bead forms, fibers and coloring to reconstruct how ornaments were made and used.
What the ornaments looked like and how they were used
The team identified 19 bead types, including cylinders, disks and ellipses. Several forms resemble plants important to Natufian communities, such as wild barley, einkorn wheat, lentils and peas. The resemblance does not establish that every bead represented a particular plant, but it shows that familiar living resources may have influenced ornament design.
Some beads retain plant fibers, evidence that they were strung and worn rather than made solely as loose objects. Many were covered with red-ochre engobe, a thin coating of liquid clay. The Hebrew University calls this the earliest known use of that coloring technique anywhere in the world; that “earliest known” claim belongs to the university’s account of the study and should not be generalized beyond the evidence examined.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
The collection at a glance
| Evidence | What was documented | What it helps establish |
|---|---|---|
| Artifacts | 142 unbaked-clay ornaments | The scale of the examined Natufian collection |
| Fingerprints | 50 preserved impressions | Direct evidence of the probable age groups of makers |
| Forms | 19 bead types, including cylinders, disks and ellipses | Variation in design and production choices |
| Stringing evidence | Preserved plant fibers on some beads | Use as strung, wearable ornaments |
| Coloring | Red-ochre engobe on many objects | An early documented clay-coloring technique |
Why this changes the story of clay and symbolism
Older accounts often associated symbolic clay objects with the Neolithic transition to farming and pottery. These ornaments push symbolic clay use earlier, into the Epipaleolithic period, when Natufian groups were settling more permanently without yet adopting agriculture or fired pottery.
That distinction matters. The objects show that clay could carry social meaning before people used it to make durable cooking vessels. Making a bead required selecting material, shaping it, adding color or fibers and deciding how it would be worn. Such work created opportunities for learning, imitation and the transmission of values between generations.
The ornaments may have communicated identity, affiliation or social relationships. Their forms, colors and use as personal items are consistent with those possibilities, but the evidence cannot assign one universal meaning to the entire collection. Different beads, sites or wearers may have used them differently.
How these ornaments differ from pottery
| Feature | Natufian ornaments in this study | Pottery comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Date and context | Approximately 15,000 years ago, among Epipaleolithic Natufian hunter-gatherers | Pottery is later than these objects; this study concerns a pre-pottery context |
| Material treatment | Clay remained unbaked, preserving fingerprints and plant fibers | Firing transforms clay into a harder ceramic and can remove or alter such surface evidence |
| Shape and use | Beads, pendants and a tiny ring intended for personal display or wear | Not established for the ornaments; pottery is a separate technology and use category |
| Maker evidence | Fifty prints allow probabilistic child, adolescent and adult classifications | No pottery-maker comparison is established by this study |
| Social function | Likely connected to identity, affiliation and relationships, with meanings varying by object or context | Not inferred from this ornament assemblage |
What fingerprints reveal about Natufian life
The strongest conclusion is social rather than forensic. Children were not merely present at Natufian settlements; at least some participated in making objects that carried symbolic or personal value. Adults and adolescents also contributed, indicating that craft knowledge could move through families or other close-knit groups.
This finding adds a human dimension to the transition toward settled life. Permanent or semi-permanent residence did not begin with farming alone. It also supported repeated teaching, imitation and collaborative production. Clay ornaments provide a record of those relationships because the makers’ accidental impressions survived in the soft material.
Limits of the evidence
- Fingerprint analysis identifies broad age groups probabilistically, not named individuals.
- Only 50 fingerprints were preserved clearly enough to analyze, so they do not represent every person who made or wore an ornament.
- The presence of child, adolescent and adult prints demonstrates participation, not the exact division of labor or supervision.
- Plant-like shapes and red coloring suggest possible symbolic choices, but they do not prove a single meaning for all 142 objects.
- The “earliest known” description for red-ochre engobe is a claim attributed to the Hebrew University’s study announcement and may change as additional finds are documented.
The broader archaeological significance
Laurent Davin, the study’s lead archaeologist, said: “This discovery completely changes how we understand the relationship between clay, symbolism, and the emergence of settled life.” The evidence supports that statement in a specific way: symbolic clay production and multigenerational craft learning were already present among hunter-gatherers moving toward settled communities, well before pottery or agriculture.
These small ornaments therefore preserve more than decoration. Their fingerprints, fibers, forms and coatings record who took part, how objects were made and how social knowledge could be passed on in a community 15,000 years ago.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
