Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
For most PCs, choose a well-reviewed TLC SSD. TLC normally gives the best balance of responsiveness, sustained-write behavior, endurance and price. QLC is the better value when you need a lot of capacity for mostly-read data and your writes are occasional or bursty. Samsung Z-NAND is not a consumer alternative to either: it is an enterprise technology for latency-critical databases, analytics, caching and high-write environments.
The NAND label is only a starting point. Controller design, firmware, cache, interface, cooling, warranty and the drive’s TBW or DWPD rating can make two SSDs with the same flash type behave very differently.
What TLC, QLC and Z-NAND mean
TLC stores three bits per cell
Triple-level cell (TLC) NAND stores three bits in each flash cell. That gives it a middle position between older, lower-density flash and higher-bit-per-cell designs: manufacturers can offer useful capacity without making the voltage states as tightly spaced as QLC does. Micron describes TLC as a solution with a good cost-versus-performance balance.
In a finished SSD, TLC does not determine performance by itself. The controller, firmware, DRAM or host-memory-buffer design, SLC write cache, interface and thermal limits determine how that NAND behaves in a particular model.
#1 Best Overall
- MEET THE NEXT GEN: Consider this a cheat code; Our Samsung 990 PRO Gen4 SSD helps you reach near max performance with lightning-fast speeds; Whether you’re a hardcore gamer or a tech guru, you’ll get power efficiency built for the final boss
- REACH THE NEXT LEVEL: Gen4 steps up with faster transfer speeds and high-performance bandwidth; With a more than 55% improvement in random performance compared to 980 PRO, it’s here for heavy computing and faster loading
- THE FASTEST SSD FROM THE WORLD'S FLASH MEMORY BRAND: The speed you need for any occasion; With read and write speeds up to 7450/6900 MB/s you’ll reach near max performance of PCIe 4.0 powering through for any use
- PLAY WITHOUT LIMITS: Give yourself some space with storage capacities from 1TB to 4TB; Sync all your saves and reign supreme in gaming, video editing, data analysis and more
- IT’S A POWER MOVE: Save the power for your performance; Get power efficiency all while experiencing up to 50% improved performance per watt over the 980 PRO; It makes every move more effective with less consumption
QLC stores four bits per cell
Quad-level cell (QLC) NAND stores four bits in each cell. The extra bit raises density and lowers the cost per bit, which is why QLC is attractive for high-capacity client drives and read-intensive storage.
Four-bit cells have narrower voltage margins than comparable TLC cells. Samsung notes that this can make sustained programming and data retention more challenging. A QLC SSD can still be an excellent fit, but its model-specific cache behavior, endurance rating and retention requirements deserve closer inspection than the label alone.
Z-NAND is a specialized enterprise technology
Samsung Z-NAND is a proprietary low-latency NAND technology used in enterprise Z-SSDs. It targets I/O-intensive systems where predictable microsecond latency and high write endurance matter more than consumer capacity pricing.
Samsung describes the SZ985 as a “new type of performance SSD” for database management, data analysis and cache. Its technology brief also lists high-capacity caching, NoSQL databases, data stores and business analytics. Those are enterprise deployment scenarios, not a reason to seek a Z-NAND drive for a home gaming PC.
Why the flash label cannot predict the whole SSD
NAND type is one component in a storage design. Before comparing TLC and QLC, check the complete specification for the exact model:
- Interface and generation: PCIe or SATA, the PCIe generation, and the available link width set an upper limit on transfer rates.
- Controller and firmware: These affect queue handling, garbage collection, error correction, latency consistency and how aggressively the drive uses its cache.
- DRAM or host-memory buffer: The design can influence mapping-table access and behavior under mixed workloads.
- SLC cache: Many client SSDs temporarily write to a faster pseudo-SLC area. The cache size and the speed after it fills are more important for large transfers than the headline burst number.
- Random performance: Random IOPS and latency matter for operating-system responsiveness, application launches and databases; sequential MB/s alone does not describe those tasks.
- Endurance and warranty: TBW (terabytes written) or DWPD (drive writes per day) is specific to the model, capacity and warranty period.
- Thermals: A drive that reaches its thermal limit may throttle, reducing sustained performance regardless of its NAND type.
- Power-loss protection: Enterprise drives often include capacitors and firmware designed to protect in-flight data and metadata; many consumer drives do not.
- Capacity and usable space: Leaving adequate free space can help a drive maintain performance, while a nearly full drive has less room for housekeeping.
A well-designed QLC drive can outperform a poorly designed TLC drive in a client workload. Use the flash label to narrow the field, then compare the drive-level specifications.
Rank #2
- THE SSD ALL-STAR: The latest 870 EVO has indisputable performance, reliability and compatibility built upon Samsung's pioneering technology.Computer Platform:PC.Encryption : Class 0 (AES 256) TCG/Opal v2.0, MS eDrive (IEEE1667), Environmental Specs - Shock : 1,500 G & 0.5 ms (Half sine).
- EXCELLENCE IN PERFORMANCE: Enjoy professional level SSD performance with 870 EVO, which maximizes the SATA interface limit to 560/530 MB/s sequential speeds, Accelerates write speeds and maintains long term high performance with a larger variable buffer
- INDUSTRY DEFINING RELIABILITY: Meet the demands of every task from everyday computing to 8K video processing, with up to 2,400 TBW
- MORE COMPATIBLE THAN EVER: 870 EVO has been compatibility tested for major host systems and applications, including chipsets, motherboards, NAS, and video recording devices. Interface- SATA 6GB/s, compatible with SATA 3GB/s and SATA 1.5GB/s interfaces
Workload-to-flash comparison
| Workload | Preferred starting point | Reason | Checks before buying |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating system, applications and mixed desktop use | TLC | Balanced responsiveness and endurance | TBW, controller, DRAM or HMB, warranty and thermal limits |
| Gaming library or media library with mostly reads | QLC or TLC | QLC provides capacity efficiently; TLC leaves more write headroom | Speed after SLC-cache exhaustion, free-space guidance and TBW |
| Photo/video editing, scratch space, software compilation and virtual machines | TLC | Frequent writes benefit from endurance and steadier sustained performance | TBW or DWPD, sustained-write graphs, thermal throttling and power-loss behavior |
| Large archive or read-mostly dataset | QLC | Density and cost are the primary advantages | Backup plan, retention requirements and expected write rate |
| Latency-critical database, analytics, cache or HPC | Z-NAND/Z-SSD class | Designed for very low latency, high endurance and I/O-intensive service | Enterprise interface, support lifecycle, power-loss protection and fleet economics |
When TLC is the safer choice
TLC is the default for a general-purpose desktop or notebook because it leaves more margin for mixed activity: operating-system updates, browser caches, application installs, game patches and background synchronization can all create writes that are difficult to predict. Its balance does not mean every TLC model is fast or durable; a low-end design can have a small cache, weak sustained performance or a modest TBW rating.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Choose TLC when the drive will regularly receive large transfers or repeated updates. Video editing scratch files, source-code builds, virtual-machine images and local databases can exhaust a temporary write cache. Once that happens, the drive’s post-cache rate and thermal behavior become visible, so a TLC model with published sustained-write data is usually easier to select confidently.
TLC is also the more comfortable choice when you cannot precisely measure future writes. Compare the manufacturer’s TBW or DWPD figure for the capacity you plan to buy, and confirm that the warranty covers the intended duration and usage. There is no universal TLC-to-QLC endurance ratio that can be applied across products.
When QLC makes sense
QLC is most compelling when capacity per dollar is the main constraint and the data is read far more often than it is rewritten. A game library, downloaded media collection, photo archive, installer repository or other large dataset can spend most of its life serving reads. In those cases, QLC’s density can reduce the purchase cost without changing everyday read access in a noticeable way.
The trade-off appears during writes. A QLC SSD may accept a burst at its advertised peak while data fits in the SLC cache, then slow substantially when the cache is full. Manufacturers may publish both a short burst rate and a lower sustained rate; use the latter for planning large copies, exports or backups. Check whether the specification describes performance with a mostly empty drive, a particular capacity, or a defined test queue depth.
Recommended Free Tools
QLC also warrants a realistic retention plan. Narrower voltage margins can weaken retention compared with TLC in comparable designs, as Samsung explains. Keep important archives backed up, follow the maker’s recommended operating conditions, and do not treat an SSD as the sole copy of irreplaceable data. Retention depends on the exact NAND, controller, temperature and use history, so a generic number of years should not be inferred from the QLC label.
Rank #3
- HUGE SPEED BOOST: Get random read/write speeds that are 40%/55% faster than 980 PRO; Experience up to 1400K/1550K IOPS, while sequential read/write speeds up to 7,450/6,900 MB/s reach near the max performance of PCIe 4.0*
- BREAKTHROUGH POWER EFFICIENCY: Use less power and get more performance; Enjoy up to 50% improved performance per watt over 980 PRO, plus optimal power efficiency with max PCIe 4.0 performance**
- SMART THERMAL CONTROL: Samsung's own nickel-coated controller delivers effective thermal control; With its slim size, 990 PRO is a perfect fit for desktops and laptops that meet the PCI-SIG D8 standard***
- THE CHAMPION MAKER: Up to 65% improvement in random performance enables faster loads for an ultimate gaming experience on PS5 and DirectStorage PC games****
- SAMSUNG MAGICIAN SOFTWARE: Get the most out of your SSD with Samsung Magician's advanced yet intuitive optimization tools; Monitor drive health, protect valuable data, and receive important updates for your 990 PRO
QLC is a poor match for a scratch disk that is rewritten continuously, a heavy compilation workspace, a write-intensive virtual-machine host or a database log volume unless the exact model has an endurance and sustained-write specification that fits those loads.
What Z-NAND adds—and what it does not
Z-NAND addresses a different optimization target. Instead of maximizing consumer capacity per dollar, Samsung designed it for very low and consistent latency and high write endurance in enterprise systems. The surrounding Z-SSD platform, controller, firmware, interface and power-loss design are part of the benefit; swapping flash types in a consumer drive does not reproduce those results.
For the SZ985, Samsung reports up to 3.2 TB capacity, up to 30 drive writes per day for five years, sequential read/write rates of up to 3,200/3,000 MB/s, and typical read/write latency of 20/16 microseconds. These are product figures for that enterprise family, not universal Z-NAND specifications and not a promise for every capacity or workload.
Samsung’s launch announcement reported 750,000 random-read IOPS and 16-microsecond write latency for the 800 GB SZ985 in a comparison with its PM963 3-bit V-NAND NVMe SSD. That comparison describes the stated test and products; it does not establish a cross-vendor result for all Z-NAND and TLC drives.
Consider Z-NAND only when the business value of lower tail latency and high write endurance justifies enterprise acquisition, qualification, support and power requirements. A consumer system normally gains more from selecting the right capacity, interface, cooling and TLC or QLC model.
How to compare two specific SSDs
1. Estimate the write pattern
Separate reads from writes and bursts from sustained activity. Installing games is a bursty write followed by long periods of reading. Video capture, scratch files, build artifacts and VM images can create repeated writes. If you cannot estimate the volume, select a TLC model with a comfortable endurance rating rather than assuming a flash-level average.
Rank #4
- Upgrade your laptop or desktop computer and feel the difference with super-fast OS boot times and application loads
- Exceptional performance offering up to 535MB/s seq. Read and 500MB/s seq. Write speeds
- Superior performance as compared to traditional hard drives (HDD)
- Ultra-low power consumption
- Backwards compatible with SATA II 3GB/sec
2. Find post-cache performance
Look for a sustained-write graph or an explicit speed after the SLC cache is exhausted. Note the test conditions, fill state and capacity. A headline sequential-write figure measured only while the cache is available is not a substitute for post-cache behavior.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →3. Compare TBW or DWPD correctly
TBW is a total warranty-period writing allowance; DWPD expresses how many full drive capacities may be written each day for a stated period. Both are model-specific. Compare equal capacities and the same warranty term, and do not transfer the rating of one TLC or QLC product to another.
4. Check random latency and IOPS
For an operating-system drive, application storage or database, random read/write latency and IOPS are often more relevant than sequential throughput. Look for figures at realistic queue depths and determine whether the vendor reports typical, maximum or test-specific values.
5. Confirm thermal and power requirements
Check whether the SSD needs a heatsink, what temperature range the specification uses, and whether the system can provide adequate airflow. For servers and workstations, verify power-loss protection and the platform’s power-delivery requirements; a consumer drive without those features may not be an acceptable substitute.
6. Read the warranty and support terms
Confirm the warranty length, TBW or DWPD limit, permitted workload, firmware-update process and support lifecycle. Enterprise procurement should also account for qualification, monitoring and replacement logistics rather than comparing retail price alone.
Recommendations by common use case
Operating-system and application drive
Start with TLC. Prioritize random latency, a suitable controller, DRAM or HMB implementation, thermal stability and a warranty whose TBW rating fits several years of updates and application installs. Capacity should leave working room instead of forcing the drive to operate nearly full.
Best Value
- THE SSD ALL-STAR: The latest 870 EVO has indisputable performance, reliability and compatibility built upon Samsung's pioneering technology. S.M.A.R.T. Support: Yes
- EXCELLENCE IN PERFORMANCE: Enjoy professional level SSD performance which maximizes the SATA interface limit to 560 530 MB/s sequential speeds,* accelerates write speeds and maintains long term high performance with a larger variable buffer, Designed for gamers and professionals to handle heavy workloads of high-end PCs, workstations and NAS
- INDUSTRY-DEFINING RELIABILITY: Meet the demands of every task — from everyday computing to 8K video processing, with up to 600 TBW** under a 5-year limited warranty***
- MORE COMPATIBLE THAN EVER: The 870 EVO has been compatibility tested**** for major host systems and applications, including chipsets, motherboards, NAS, and video recording devices
- UPGRADE WITH EASE: Using the 870 EVO SSD is as simple as plugging it into the standard 2.5 inch SATA form factor on your desktop PC or laptop; The renewed migration software takes care of the rest
Gaming PC
Choose QLC when the drive is primarily a large game library and the price or capacity advantage is meaningful. Game installation, updates and recording can produce large writes, so inspect the post-cache rate and TBW. Choose TLC if you frequently move games, capture video to the same drive, or want more sustained-write headroom.
Media library and home archive
QLC is a reasonable starting point for read-mostly media and archives when a separate backup exists. Check the expected write rate, retention conditions and the manufacturer’s free-space guidance. TLC is preferable if the archive is repeatedly reorganized, transcoded or rewritten.
Photo and video production
Use TLC for scratch, ingest, project and cache volumes that receive frequent writes. Compare sustained-write behavior, TBW or DWPD, cooling and power-loss behavior. A high sequential burst number is not enough for long exports or repeated cache flushes.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Software development and virtual machines
TLC is generally the safer starting point because builds, package caches, logs and VM images create mixed random and sequential writes. If a QLC model is considered for secondary storage, verify its sustained rate and endurance against measured project activity.
Databases, analytics and high-performance computing
Evaluate enterprise Z-NAND/Z-SSD-class products when microsecond latency, high write endurance and predictable service behavior have measurable business value. Confirm interface compatibility, power-loss protection, support lifecycle and fleet economics before deployment. Do not select a Z-NAND product solely because its sequential MB/s figure is higher.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Assuming every TLC SSD is faster or more durable than every QLC SSD.
- Using a burst sequential speed as the expected rate for a full-drive copy.
- Comparing TBW figures from different capacities or warranty periods as if they were equivalent.
- Ignoring random latency when selecting an operating-system or database drive.
- Filling a drive so completely that it has little room for background management.
- Treating an SSD as the only backup of irreplaceable files.
- Buying enterprise flash for a consumer workload without accounting for interface, support and total system cost.
- Assuming Samsung’s SZ985 figures apply to every Z-NAND generation, capacity or implementation.
Bottom line
TLC is the sound default for mixed, write-heavy or uncertain workloads. QLC is the capacity-focused option for read-mostly libraries and archives, provided you accept lower sustained-write headroom and plan backups around the drive’s retention and endurance specifications. Z-NAND belongs to enterprise systems that can justify very low latency and high write endurance. In every case, choose by the complete model specification—not by the three-letter flash label alone.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
