Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Wikiwand review

Freemium#23 of 32 in Online Encyclopedias

A feature-rich Wikipedia reading layer, not a standalone encyclopedia.

7.0/10Editor score
Wikiwand7.0 Visit Wikiwand

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Wikiwand presents Wikipedia articles in a redesigned reader for people who want more control over browsing and presentation. Its browser extension redirects Wikipedia article links to corresponding Wikiwand pages while retaining a link back to Wikipedia. The service supports text and images, and its customization options make it suited to readers who prefer adjustable colors, fonts, and layouts over Wikipedia’s standard interface.

Navigation is the product’s clearest focus. Article timelines, a fixed table of contents, keyboard navigation, maps, hover previews, and article quality scores add context and help readers move through long entries. Multi-language search with thumbnails broadens discovery, while fact-checking compares language versions and sources. Article questions and AI chat add another way to explore topics, although the core experience remains centered on reading Wikipedia material. Wikiwand is available on the web and through a Chrome extension, placing it naturally in a desktop browsing workflow.

The main trade-off is its dependence on Wikipedia: Wikiwand changes how articles are viewed but does not supply a separate encyclopedia. Readers seeking a new editorial corpus, rather than a customized layer over Wikipedia, should look elsewhere. Its browser-centered platform scope may also be less suitable for people seeking a broader device ecosystem. Support is provided by email. Choose Wikiwand if enhanced navigation, previews, multilingual comparison, and visual customization matter; choose an alternative if independent content ownership or a standalone reference service is the priority.

Wikiwand pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Timelines, maps, previews, and a fixed table of contents aid navigation.
    • Compares language versions and sources for article fact-checking.
    • Customizes colors, fonts, layout, and keyboard navigation.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Redirects Wikipedia content instead of providing an independent encyclopedia.
    • Its platform footprint centers on the web and a Chrome extension.
    • Email is the listed support channel for assistance.

Wikiwand fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update