Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

ValidateThat review

Freemium#6 of 39 in Card Sorting Software

Affordable card-sort research with AI analysis, broad study types, and a useful free plan.

7.6/10Editor score
ValidateThat7.6 Visit ValidateThat

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

ValidateThat is a web-based UX research platform for UX researchers, product teams, agencies, and educators. It supports open, closed, and hybrid card sorts alongside tree tests, first-click or prototype tests, surveys, participant recruitment, and website embedding. Researchers can share studies through links without participant accounts, monitor responses in real time, and analyze findings with automatic clustering, dendrograms, similarity matrices, AI insights, and CSV exports.

The published plans make the product accessible to small teams. Free includes three studies, unlimited responses from an own link, basic analytics for the first three respondents, and three free recruited responses. Starter costs $19 per month or $160 per year and adds unlimited card sorts, tree tests, first-click tests, full analytics, AI insights, and CSV exports. Pro costs $49 per month or $399 per year, adding 10 recruited responses monthly, website embeds, surveys, published reports, and priority support. Team plans cost $149 monthly for three seats or $199 monthly for five seats, with multi-seat workspaces, custom branding, SSO-lite, and a dedicated account manager.

Its main strength is breadth within a focused research workflow: all three card-sort modes, real-time results, advanced visual analysis, AI synthesis, and Prolific recruitment sit in one cloud platform, with web and API access plus Claude and Figma integrations. GDPR compliance and 24/7 email support are listed. The trade-off is that the free tier’s analytics are intentionally narrow, while recruited responses are capped by plan. Teams needing larger recruitment programs, deeper enterprise governance, or extensive collaboration should evaluate alternatives; affordable solo researchers and small product teams should find the Starter or Pro tiers a closer fit.

ValidateThat pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports open, closed, and hybrid card sorts plus tree tests
    • AI insights, clustering, dendrograms, and similarity matrices
    • Free plan and Prolific recruitment support flexible participant sourcing
  • Where it doesn't
    • Free analytics cover only the first 3 respondents
    • Recruitment allowances are limited on paid plans
    • Advanced collaboration and branding require Team plans

ValidateThat fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update