Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

UserQ review

Freemium#35 of 52 in Usability Testing SoftwareUser Testing

Affordable unmoderated prototype research with participant recruitment and a free workspace.

5.9/10Editor score
UserQ5.9 Visit UserQ

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

UserQ is a web-based remote user research platform for UX researchers, designers, product teams, and marketers. Its focus is unmoderated research, with tools for Figma prototype testing, card sorting, tree testing, surveys, preference testing, five-second testing, and first-click testing. Teams can recruit from the UserQ participant panel or share studies with their own participants. The product is particularly suited to MENA-focused research, with surveys available in English or Arabic and participant filtering by demographics and custom screening questions.

Pricing is structured around individual and team use. The Pay-As-You-Go plan provides a free individual workspace and charges $29 per published test. After publishing, it includes unlimited tests and responses, with recruitment available through the UserQ panel or a researcher's own participants. The monthly Team plan costs $95 per month and includes a team workspace, test publishing, unlimited tests and responses, and access to all functionalities. The annual Team plan costs $960 per year with the same inclusions and annual billing. For occasional studies, pay-as-you-go keeps the entry point focused on individual tests; teams running repeated research have publishing included in either Team plan.

The strongest fit is for teams that need a broad set of unmoderated prototype and information-architecture methods in one web platform. Online results reports and spreadsheet export support analysis and sharing, while custom recruitment can support external and moderated research sessions. UserQ is less suitable for teams that need built-in moderated sessions, native mobile-app research, AI features, or a wider integration ecosystem. Choose it for focused, affordable prototype research with MENA participant considerations; consider an alternative when moderated or mobile research is central to the workflow.

UserQ pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports Figma prototype, card sorting, tree, survey, and preference studies
    • Recruit from the UserQ panel or bring your own participants
    • English and Arabic surveys with filtering and spreadsheet export
  • Where it doesn't
    • Does not provide built-in moderated sessions
    • Native mobile-app testing is not included
    • Figma is the only listed integration

UserQ fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update