Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

udoc review

Free#33 of 60 in PDF Data Extraction Software

A free, self-hosted toolkit for extracting native PDF content into structured output.

6.1/10Editor score
udoc6.1 Visit udoc

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

udoc is a free, open-source document extraction toolkit for developers who want to process PDFs and other document formats through a command-line interface, Python bindings, or a Rust API. It is designed for local, self-hosted use, with document data available as JSON or streaming JSONL. Its focus is extraction and structured output rather than a managed interface, so it fits technical workflows better than teams seeking a ready-made visual application.

For PDFs, udoc extracts text, metadata, and images, reconstructs reading order, and detects tables using heuristics. It can render pages to PNG and process a document page by page, which gives developers options for handling long documents or consuming results incrementally. Encrypted PDFs are supported when supplied with a password. The project is dual-licensed under MIT and Apache-2.0. These capabilities make it useful where native PDF content needs to feed downstream code; table detection is heuristic, so documents with irregular layouts may require review or additional processing.

OCR is available only through optional external hooks, not as a built-in capability. Scanned PDFs without a configured OCR hook yield no extracted text, making that an important constraint for archives dominated by scans. The free, self-hosted approach suits developers who can integrate extraction into their own workflows and configure external components when needed. Teams looking for built-in OCR or a polished, integrated extraction service should consider another tool; udoc is a better fit when control over local processing and developer-facing APIs matter more.

udoc pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Extracts PDF text, metadata, images, and reading order
    • Detects tables with heuristics and renders pages to PNG
    • Offers CLI, Python bindings, Rust API, and JSON or JSONL output
  • Where it doesn't
    • OCR depends on an external hook rather than built-in support
    • Scanned PDFs yield no extracted text without OCR
    • Heuristic table detection may not suit every document layout

udoc fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update