Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Transcribe.so review

Freemium#6 of 25 in Podcast Transcription Software

A flexible transcription tool with low-cost usage pricing, Q&A, and developer access.

8.8/10Editor score
Transcribe.so8.8 Visit Transcribe.so

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Transcribe.so converts uploaded or URL-based audio and video into searchable transcripts for podcasters, creators, students, professionals, and teams. Its feature set covers speaker labels, word-level timestamps, summaries, automatic chapters, transcript search, cited Q&A, and SRT or VTT caption exports. Transcription supports 52 languages and dialects, making the product suitable for podcasts, interviews, lectures, meetings, videos, and voice notes.

Pricing is structured for both occasional and recurring use. The Free plan includes pay-as-you-go transcription at $1 per hour, three AI Q&A requests per transcript, and API and MCP access. The Pay as you go plan adds standard transcription, summaries, chapters, speaker labels, search, and wallet credits that never expire. Starter costs $9 per month and adds unlimited standard transcription with AI Q&A. Pro costs $19 per month and adds unlimited AI Q&A with longer answers plus email support. Business costs $49 per month and adds 15 parallel API jobs and priority processing. Enterprise adds 50+ parallel API jobs, SSO, custom contracts, dedicated support, and a custom SLA. Paid transcription is subject to fair-use guidelines.

The product’s strongest distinction is its combination of transcript analysis and developer access. Cited Q&A can work across recordings and transcript libraries, while the HTTP API, MCP server, and CLI support workflows involving ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, n8n, and Zapier. That makes Transcribe.so a practical fit for buyers who want URL transcription, searchable archives, and automation without committing to an enterprise plan. Buyers needing higher API concurrency, SSO, or dedicated support should choose Enterprise; those seeking a simple transcription-only workflow may not need its broader Q&A and integration features.

Transcribe.so pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Transcribes uploads and URLs with speaker labels and word-level timestamps
    • Includes searchable transcripts, chapters, summaries, captions, and cited Q&A
    • Offers HTTP API, MCP server, CLI, and integrations with ChatGPT and Zapier
  • Where it doesn't
    • Paid transcription is unlimited under fair-use guidelines
    • Business provides 15 parallel API jobs; higher capacity requires Enterprise
    • Enterprise uses custom contracts rather than a published monthly price

Transcribe.so fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update