TestAccessibility review
A focused free scanner for page-level accessibility checks and regression comparisons.
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
TestAccessibility is a browser-based website accessibility checker for developers, QA teams, content editors, agencies, and site owners. Users submit a public URL and receive an automated axe-core report covering issues such as missing alternative text, low contrast, missing form labels, empty buttons, heading problems, ARIA errors, and keyboard traps. Its free model makes it a practical choice for one-off page reviews and targeted checks during content or development work.
The strongest part of the product is its reporting workflow. Results include severity counts, rule-level findings, accessibility issue guidance, and shareable public report links that can be sent to teammates or attached to tickets. Rescanning supports regression comparison, which is useful when a page has been updated and the team wants to compare follow-up results. The checks are oriented toward WCAG 2.1 and include contrast, labels, ARIA, headings, and alternative text, giving teams a focused automated review of common page-level concerns.
TestAccessibility is best suited to teams that need a straightforward public-page scanner without a paid plan. Its scope stays centered on individual pages, so organizations seeking a broader accessibility platform should look for a product with wider workflow coverage. Automated findings also do not replace manual accessibility testing, as the documentation advises combining both approaches. Choose TestAccessibility for free scans, shareable findings, and regression comparisons; choose an alternative when accessibility work requires broader operational coverage than page-oriented checks.
TestAccessibility pros and cons
- Where it wins
- Free public URL scans with automated axe-core checks
- Shareable reports include severity counts and rule-level findings
- Rescans support regression comparison across page checks
- Where it doesn't
- Focused on single-page checks rather than broader platform workflows
- Checks are oriented to WCAG 2.1 rather than later WCAG versions
- Automated results still need manual accessibility testing
TestAccessibility fact sheet, pricing and score →
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Last updated · How we research and update