Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Stark review

Freemium#28 of 129 in Website Accessibility ToolsFigma PluginsAccessibility Testing SoftwareColor Contrast Checker Software

Broad accessibility coverage across design, code, mobile, CI/CD, and compliance workflows.

6.4/10Editor score
Stark6.4 Visit Stark

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Stark brings accessibility work into design, development, QA, product, and compliance workflows. It combines WCAG audits, browser-based testing, manual testing and annotations, automated scans, remediation guidance, reporting, and governance tools. Coverage extends from Figma and code repositories to public and private URLs, CI/CD pipelines, and native iOS and Android testing. A free plan makes it a practical starting point for teams that want broad accessibility coverage without beginning with a paid commitment.

Pricing expands by plan and organizational scope. Premium Pack costs $198 per user per year, billed annually, with a minimum of three seats; it adds automated detection and remediation for Figma, browser WCAG scans and reports, and live code highlighting. Launch costs $2,500 per year and includes three editors, 25 viewers, weekly scans, and connections to Figma, code repositories, and public URLs. Grow costs $8,000 per year, adds 10 editors and 50 viewers, daily scans, CI/CD, mobile testing, ticketing integration, and Compliance Center. Scale costs $21,000 per year, includes 20 editors and unlimited viewers, real-time scans, monitoring for up to 4,000 pages, SSO, JIT provisioning, and dedicated account management.

The platform’s breadth is its main differentiator. Integrations include Sketch, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Storybook, Cypress, Puppeteer, Playwright, iOS, Android, and ticketing and project-management tools. Reports cover violations, potential issues, passed checks, and downloadable results, while annotations support alt text, focus order, landmarks, headings, and ARIA notes. Stark suits teams coordinating accessibility across multiple product stages; organizations seeking only a narrow browser checker may find this scope and tier structure more than they need.

Stark pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Free plan with WCAG 2.2 coverage and automated scanning
    • Tests design files, code, URLs, CI/CD pipelines, iOS, and Android
    • Integrations span Figma, repositories, browsers, testing, and ticketing tools
  • Where it doesn't
    • Premium Pack starts at $198 per user per year with a three-seat minimum
    • Higher tiers require annual commitments of $2,500, $8,000, or $21,000
    • WCAG Audit coverage is 62% of WCAG AA criteria

Stark fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update