Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Squidex review

Freemium#4 of 34 in Headless CMS

A flexible headless CMS for teams that want open-source or hosted deployment.

9.0/10Editor score
Squidex9.0 Visit Squidex

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Squidex is an open-source headless CMS for teams managing structured content, assets, schemas, workflows, and localized entries. Developers can deliver content to websites, mobile applications, and other digital products through REST and GraphQL APIs. It supports both self-hosted deployment and a hosted cloud service, with Docker and Kubernetes options for teams that want control over their infrastructure.

Its freemium model includes a free plan and application tiers named Starter, Basic, Professional, and Business. The published plan limits scale from 20,000 to 1,500,000 API calls, from 2 GB to 100 GB of traffic, and from 500 MB to 100 GB of storage. Contributor allowances range from 2 to 50, while Contents CDN and Assets CDN appear across these application tiers. The Cloud SaaS option adds hosted cloud infrastructure, daily backups, automatic feature updates, replicated data storage, and failover cluster mode. This makes the plan structure relevant to teams comparing operational control with managed hosting.

Squidex also fits development stacks and search or messaging systems through integrations including .NET, TypeScript, Java, PHP, Algolia, Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Typesense, Kafka, RabbitMQ, Azure Queue, Discourse, Medium, Slack, and Fastly. Localization includes multiple languages and fallback languages, while custom roles, webhooks, previews, audit logs, version history, and image transformations support structured publishing workflows. Choose Squidex if open-source deployment, API flexibility, and content modeling are priorities. Teams wanting a narrower, simpler publishing tool may prefer an alternative with fewer deployment and configuration decisions.

Squidex pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Self-hosting with Docker or Kubernetes deployment options
    • REST and GraphQL APIs with structured schemas and localized content
    • Fine-grained permissions, previews, version history, and image processing
  • Where it doesn't
    • Self-hosted deployments require Docker or Kubernetes operations
    • Usage limits vary across API, traffic, storage, and contributor tiers
    • The platform may exceed the needs of teams seeking a simpler CMS

Squidex fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update