Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Shed review

A broad open-source live production stack for operators comfortable managing hosting.

4.7/10Editor score
Shed4.7 Visit Muxshed

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Shed, branded by its vendor as Muxshed, is an open-source, self-hosted live production studio for solo creators, small teams, mid-market organizations, and enterprises. It accepts RTMP, SRT, and WebRTC inputs, then lets operators switch scenes and mix sources in a browser. Its output options include YouTube, Twitch, Kick, Facebook, and custom RTMP/RTMPS endpoints, making it suited to teams that want control over both production and distribution. Guest links, scheduling, playlists, overlays, recording, and a public watch page extend it beyond a basic stream relay.

The strongest case for Shed is the breadth of its production stack. A browser-based switcher handles scenes, overlays, and stinger transitions, while multistream fan-out sends one program to multiple destinations. Local recording and scheduled broadcasts support repeatable programming, and playlists add structure for planned streams. Operators can connect OBS, Elgato Stream Deck, or Bitfocus Companion, while API and WebSocket control provide a path for custom workflows. These features make Shed a fit for self-hosters who value an open-source foundation and want production, distribution, and viewing handled in one deployment.

The main tradeoff is operational ownership. Shed is deployed self-hosted, so the organization running it is responsible for the hosting environment and the surrounding administration. That model suits technically capable operators who want control, custom RTMP/RTMPS destinations, and API access, but it is less suitable for teams seeking a hosted service with minimal infrastructure responsibility. Choose Shed when open-source deployment, flexible ingest, multistreaming, and browser-based control are priorities; consider another option when a simpler managed workflow matters more than control and breadth.

Shed pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Accepts RTMP, SRT, and WebRTC inputs
    • Combines switching, overlays, recording, and scheduling
    • Fans out streams to major and custom destinations
  • Where it doesn't
    • Self-hosted deployment puts infrastructure responsibility on the operator
    • API and WebSocket control may be more than simple broadcasts need
    • Browser-based production may not suit desktop-first workflows

Shed fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update