Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Scoop review

Free#12 of 22 in Web Archiving Software

Configurable page capture to WARC or WACZ, for workflows that handle storage and replay elsewhere.

7.9/10Editor score
Scoop7.9 Visit Scoop

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Scoop is an open-source capture engine from Harvard Library Innovation Lab, delivered as a command-line tool and a JavaScript library for Node.js. It is aimed at developers and organizations building web-preservation workflows, rather than people seeking a hosted service to browse and search an archive. Capture runs through Chromium and can be initiated from the CLI or programmatically, including through a JavaScript library/API. It is available for Linux, macOS, and Windows, with self-hosted deployment.

Capture controls and output formats are the central strengths. Scoop saves individual pages and resources in WARC, compressed WARC, or WACZ, with configurable timeouts, page dimensions, and size limits; raw exchanges can also be optional capture material. Attachments can include screenshots, PDF and DOM snapshots, videos with subtitles and metadata, provenance summaries, and SSL certificates. WACZ signing and verification are supported, including integration with a compatible signing endpoint. This makes Scoop a fit when a preservation workflow needs control over what a capture contains and how it is packaged, not simply a page snapshot.

The trade-off is scope: Scoop creates archive files for storage and later replay with compatible web archive software, but does not provide archive search or a hosted archive service. Its ecosystem centers on Node.js, Playwright, Chromium, and the WACZ signing endpoint; support is community-based. There are no paid tiers to weigh: Scoop is open source and has a free plan. Choose it if you can build or maintain the surrounding capture, storage, and replay workflow. A team that needs a ready-to-use searchable archive should choose a different kind of product.

Scoop pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Exports captures in WARC, compressed WARC, or WACZ formats
    • Adds optional screenshots, PDFs, DOM snapshots, video, and provenance
    • Supports configurable capture limits plus WACZ signing and verification
  • Where it doesn't
    • Captures individual pages rather than providing a hosted archive
    • Does not include archive search
    • Requires a separate workflow for storing and replaying captures

Scoop fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update